Prospective study of comparison between the ultrasonography with the plain radiography in the diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum of hollow viscus perforation

Ashwin K. Hebbar, Shashidhara T.M., Harish Iyanna, Sudhir B.V., Sushil Kumar B.V.

Abstract


Background: This study was conducted to compare the plain radiography with the abdominal ultrasonography in the detection of pneumoperitoneum in suspected cases of hollow viscus perforation.

Methods: A total number of 60 patients with suspected hollow viscus perforation were studied. All the patients had undergone plain radiography (Erect x-ray abdomen and left lateral decubitus views), ultrasonography and exploratory laparotomy. The investigational findings were compared with that of laparotomy findings. They were compared in terms of their sensitivity, specificity, predictive value of a positive and negative results and their percentage of false positive and false negative results.

Results: Of the 60 patients, who underwent laparotomy, 57 had hollow viscus perforation. Out of 3 non-hollow viscus perforated cases 2 had appendicular perforation and 1 had mesenteric lymphadenitis. In the diagnosis, ultrasonography vs. radiography, their respective parameters were sensitivity (73.7% vs. 80.7%), specificity (66.7% each), predictive value of a positive test (97.7% vs. 97.9%), predictive value of a negative test (11.8% vs. 15.4%), percentage of false negative (26.3% vs. 19.3%) and percentage of false positive (33.3% each).

Conclusion: In detection of pneumoperitoneum plain radiography appears to be more sensitive than ultrasonography with comparable specificity. Ultrasonographic finding of pneumoperitoneum is considered as an added finding.

 


Keywords


Plain radiography, Ultrasonography, Hollow viscus perforation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Miller RE, Nelson SW. The Roentgenologic Demonstration of Tiny Amounts of Free Intraperitoneal Gas; Experimental and Clinical Studies. AJR 1971;112:574-85.

John H. Woodring, Michael J Heiser. Detection of pneumoperitoneum on chest radiographs; Comparison of upright lateral and posteroanterior projections. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Jul;165(1):45-7.

R. Grassi, R. Di Mizio, A. Pinto, A. Cioffi, L. Romano and A. Rotondo, Comparative adequacy of conventional radiography, ultrasonography and computed tomography in sixty-one consecutive patients with gastrointestinal perforations. Radiol. Med.1996; 91:747-755.

Earls JP, Dachman AH, Colon. E, Garrett. M.G. Molloy M. Prevalence and duration of post operative pneumoperitoneum; sensitivity of CT vs. left lateral decubitus radiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993 Oct; 161(4):781-5.

Chen SC, Lin FY, Hsieh YS, Chen WJ. Accuracy of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of peritonitis compared with the clinical impression of the surgeon. Arch. Surg.2000; 135: 170-173.

Puylaert JBCM, Van der Zant FM. Rijke AM. Sonography And The Acute Abdomen; Practical Considerations. Am. J. Roentgenol.1997; 168:179-86.

Edgar D. Staren, Guest Editor, Surgical clinics of North America 2004;84:IX-X.

Braccini.Get al. USG versus Plain film in the detection of pneumoperitoneum, Abdominal Imaging 1996 Sept-Oct: 21(15):404-412.

Chen CH, YangCC, Yeh YH. Role of upright chest radiography and ultrasonography in demonstrating free air of perforated peptic ulcers. Hepatogastroenterology 2001 July-Aug; 48 (40):1082-1084.

SC Chen, ZS Ye, IP Wang, FY Lin, CY Hsu and WJ Chen, Ultrasonography is superior to plain radiography in the diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum. British Journal of Surgery 2002; 89: 351-354.

Chadha D, Kedar RP, Malde HM. Sonographic detection of pneumoperitoneum; an experimental and clinical study. Australas. Radiol. 1993 May; 37(2):182-5.

Roberto Grassi, et al. Gastro-Duodenal Perforations; Conventional Plain Film, US and CT Findings in 166 Consecutive Patients. European Journal of Radiology 2004; 50:30-36.

SC Chen et al. Selective ucse of ultrasonography for the detection of pneumoperitoneum. Academic Emergency Medicine 2002: 9. No.6: 643-645.

Seitz K, Reising KD. Ultrasound Detection Of Free Air In The Abdominal Cavity. Ultraschall Med. 1982 Mar; 3 (1): 4-6.

Karaha OI, Kurt A, Yikilmaz, Kahriman G. New method for the detection of intraperitoneal free air by sonography: scissors maneuver. J Clin Ultrasound 2004 Oct; 32 (8): 381-5.

Chang-Chien CS, Lin HH, Yen CL, Lee CM, Lin SM. Sonographic demonstration of free air in perforated peptic ulcer: comparison of sonography with radiography. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound 1989 Feb; 17 (2): 95-100.

Kainberger P, Zukriegel M, Sattlegger P, Forstner R, Schmoller HJ. Ultrasound detection of pneumoperitoneum based on typical ultrasound morphology. Ultraschall. Med. 1994 Jun; 15(3): 122-5.

Lee DH, Lim JH, Ko YT, Yoon Y. Sonographic Detection of Pneumoperitoneum in Patients with Acute Abdomen. AJR 1990 Jan; 154(1):107-9.

Marija Frkovic, Tajana Klapan, Ines Moscatellco, Marijan Frkovic. Diagnostic Value of Pneumoperitoneum on Plain Abdominal Film. Radiol. Oncol 2001; 35(4): 237-42.