Haemodynamic response to endotrachial intubation: direct versus video laryngoscopy


  • Amit Kumar Kamewad Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, India
  • Vipul Krishen Sharma Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, India
  • Surekha Mudi Kamewad Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, India
  • Vitesh Popli Department of Surgery, Command Hospital (EC), Kolkata, India




Conventional laryngoscopy, Endotracheal intubation, Haemodynamic changes, Video laryngoscopy


Background: Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation is an integral part of general anesthesia. Endotracheal intubation involving conventional laryngoscopy produces a haemodynamic changes associated with increased heart and blood pressure. The aim of the present study was to compare the hemodynamic changes that occur during and after endotracheal intubation with either a conventional (Macintosh) laryngoscope or a video laryngoscope in patients who are ASA grade I and II.

Methods: After getting approval from ethics committee and consent form from each patients 120 patients with age between 18-65 years of ASA-I, II grade were included in the study. They were divided into two groups. Group A was underwent with tracheal intubation with the Macintosh blade (size 3 blade and size 4) and group B with AWS (Pentax) video laryngoscope. The time taken to perform endotracheal intubation and haemodynamic changes associated with intubation were noted in both the groups at different time points.

Results: The duration of laryngoscopy and intubation was significantly longer in group B (video laryngoscopy) when compared to group A patients. However, haemodynamic changes did not showed any significant differences between the groups.

Conclusions: Video laryngoscopy did not offer any advantages in terms of haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation in patients when compared with conventional ones.


Henderson J. Airway management in the adult. In: Miller RD, editor. Miller's Anaesthesia. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone. 2010;1573-610.

Rose DK, Cohen MM. The airway, problems and predictions in 18,500 patients. Can J Anaesth. 1994;41:372-83.

Helfman SM, Gold MI, DeLisser EA, Herrington CA. Which drug prevents tachycardia and hypertension associated with tracheal intubation: Lidocaine, fentanyl, or esmolol? Anesth Analg. 1991;72:482-6.

Thompson JP, Hall AP, Russell J, Cagney B, Rowbotham DJ. Effect of remifentanil on the haemodynamic response to orotracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth. 1998;80:467-9.

McCoy EP, Mirakhur RK, McCloskey BV. A comparison of the stress response to laryngoscopy: The Macintosh versus the McCoy blade. Anaesthesia. 1995;50:943-6.

Kanchi M, Nair HC, Banakal S, Murthy K, Murugesan C. Haemodynamic response to endotracheal intubation in coronary artery disease: Direct versus video laryngoscopy. Indian J Anaesth. 2011;55(3):260-5.

Kitamura T, Yamada Y, Chinzei M, Du HL, Hanaoka K. Attenuation of haemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation by the Stylet Scope. Br J Anaesth. 2001;86:275-7.

Fox EJ, Sklar GS, Hill CH, Villanoeva R, King BD. Complications related to the pressor response to endotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology. 1977;47:524-5.

Prys-Roberts C, Greene LT, Meloche R, Foex P. Studies of anaesthesia in relation to hypertension II: Hemodynamic consequences of induction and endotracheal intubation. Br J Anesth. 1971;43:531-47.

Ovassapian A, Yelich J, Dykes MH, Brunner EE. Blood pressure and heart rate changes during awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation. Anesth Analg. 1983;62:951-4.

Bennett SR, Grace D, Griffin SC. Cardiovascular changes with the laryngeal mask airway in cardiac anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2004;92:885-7.

Malik MA, Maharaj CH, Harte1 BH, Laffey JG. Comparison of Macintosh, Truview EVO2, Glidescope, and Airwayscope laryngoscope use in patients with cervical spine immobilization. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101:723-30.

Asai T, Enomoto Y, Shimizu K, Shingu K, Okuda Y. The Pentax-AWS Video-Laryngoscope: The First Experience in One Hundred Patients. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:257-9.




How to Cite

Kamewad, A. K., Sharma, V. K., Kamewad, S. M., & Popli, V. (2016). Haemodynamic response to endotrachial intubation: direct versus video laryngoscopy. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 4(12), 5196–5200. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20164040



Original Research Articles