Detection and comparison of fetal malnutrition by CANSCORE and other methods

Abhaykumar Balajirao Dhanorkar, Prashant Bagdey, Arun Humne, Suresh Ughade, Seema Prakash Yadav, Amol Dadarao Khadse

Abstract


Background: Objective of current study was clinical assessment of nutritional status of neonate using CANSCORE and comparison with other methods of determining fetal malnutrition. Design: Cross sectional study. Setting: Tertiary care hospital. Study subjects: 384 live born singleton neonates with known gestational age and no major congenital malformation.

Methods: Birth weight, length, midarm circumference and head circumference recorded in new-borns. Ponderal index and mid arm to head circumference ratio was calculated. Clinical assessment of nutritional status was done on the basis of CANSCORE and compared with other methods.

Results: CANSCORE <25 separated 67.71% of the babies as well-nourished and 32.29% as malnourished. Weight for age and MAC/HC classified nearly 70% of babies as well-nourished and 30% as malnourished. Also Ponderal index classified 75.52% the babies as well-nourished and 24.48% as malnourished.

Conclusion: CANSCORE may be a simple clinical index for identifying fetal malnutrition and for prediction of neonatal morbidity associated with it, without the aid of any sophisticated equipments.

 


Keywords


CANSCORE, Fetal malnutrition

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bhargava SK. Perspectives in child health in India. Indian Pediatr. 1991;28:1403-10.

Villar J, Alobelli L, Kestler E, Belizan J. Health priority for developing countries. The prevention of chronic fetal malnutrition. Bull World Health Organ. 1986;64:847-51.

Metcoff J. Association of fetal growth with maternal nutrition. In: Falkner F, Tanner JM, eds. Human Growth. 2nd ed. New York: Plenum Publishing Corporation; 1986: 333-388.

Altman DZ, Hyten F. Intrauterine growth retardation, let's clear about it. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;96:1127-8.

Georgieff MK, Sasanow SR, Chockalingam UM, Pereira GR. A comparison of mid arm/head circumference ratio and Ponderal index for evaluation of mentally retarded infants after abnormal intrauterine growth. Acta Pediatr Scand. 1988;77:214-9.

Kumari S, Jain S, Sethi GR, Yadav M, Saili A, Lai UB. A simple method of screening for intrauterine growth retardation. Indian Pediatr. 1988;55:283-6.

Metcoff J. Clinical assessment of nutritional status at birth: Fetal malnutrition and SGA are not synonymous. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1994;41:875-91.

Miller HC, Hassanein K. Diagnosis of impaired fetal growth in new-born infants. Pediatr. 1971;48:511-22.

Bhargava SK, Ghosh S, Lall UB, Kumar A, Kumari S. Morbidity pattern in new-borns by gestation and intrauterine growth. Indian Pediatr. 1974;11:481-5.

Battaglia FC, Lubchenco LO. A practical classification of new-born infants by weight and gestational age. J Pediatr. 1967;71:159-63.

Gruenwald P. Growth of the human fetus: Normal growth and its variation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1966;94:1112-6.

Deter RL, Hadlock FP, Harrist RB. Evaluation of fetal growth and the detection of intrauterine growth retardation. In: Callen PW, eds. Ultrasonography in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1st ed. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co; 1983: 113-140.

Scott KE, Usher R. Fetal malnutrition: Its incidence, causes and effects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1966;94:951-63.

Meadow NJ, Till J, Leaf A. Screening for intrauterine growth retardation using ratio of mid arm circumference to occipitofrontal circumference. Br Med J. 1986;292:1039-40.