DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20163784

Role of multiparametric MRI in detection of prostatic lesions; of evaluation contrast enhanced MRI, diffusion weighted imaging and MR spectroscopy in malignant and benign prostatic lesions

Pratiksha Yadav, Rajul Bhargava

Abstract


Background: Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in males and one of the leading causes of cancer-related death in men. Pretreatment assessment of prostate cancer is divided into detection, localization, and staging; accurate assessment is a prerequisite for optimal clinical management and therapy selection. The purpose of the study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric MRI for prostatic cancer detection using T2 weighted MR imaging, diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and contrast enhanced MRI. To determine the use of MR spectroscopy in prostatic lesions.

Methods: It is a prospective single institutional study done on 29 patients with prostate lesions and elevated PSA level. Axial, coronal and sagittal images were obtained using T1WI, T2WI and STIR sequences. Advanced sequences like Diffusion weighted images, Spectroscopy and post gadolinium T1WI were taken after the basic MRI images.

Results: Study was done in 29 patients, age was ranging between 51years to 90 years, mean age is 70.7 years. On multiparametric MRI findings 45% were detected malignant lesions and 55% patients detected benign lesions. On biopsy correlation 42% of these cases turned out to be malignant and 58% as benign lesions. Detection of malignancy by T2WI imaging alone given sensitivity of 80.1% and specificity of 85.4%.By DWI alone sensitivity was 85.7% and specificity was 89.4%,on MRS sensitivity is 90.6% and specificity was 91.1%. Combined (MRI+DWI+MRS) gave sensitivity of 92.3% and specificity of 94.4% for detection of malignant prostatic lesion. Positive predictive value is 90% and negative predictive value was 88%.

Conclusions: The best characterization of prostatic cancer in individual patients will most likely result from a multiparametric exam. Recent advances include additional functional and physiologic MR imaging techniques (diffusion weighted imaging, MR spectroscopy, and perfusion imaging), which allow extension of the obtainable information beyond anatomic assessment. Multiparametric MR imaging provides the highest accuracy in diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer.


Keywords


Diffusion weighted, Magnetic resonance imaging, Multiparametric, Prostate cancer, Spectroscopy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Jemal A, Murray T, Ward E, Samuels A, Tiwari RC, Ghafoor A, et al. Cancer statistics, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55(1):10-30.

Physician Data Query (PDQ) of the National Cancer Institute: treatment options for health professionals—prostate cancer. Available at: http://www .cancer.gov. Accessed February 20, 2004.

Lu-Yao GL, Yao SL. Population-based study of long-term survival in patients with clinically localised prostate cancer. Lancet. 1997;349:906-10.

Holmberg L, Bill-Axelson A, Helgesen F, Salo JO, Folmerz P, Häggman M, Andersson S, et al. A randomized trial comparing radical prostatectomy with watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:781-9.

Coakley FV, Qayyum A, Kurhanewicz J. Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopic imaging of prostate cancer. J Urol. 2003;170:S69-75; discussion S75-S76.

Park BK, Park JW, Park SY, Kim CK, Lee HM, Jeon SS, et al. Prospective evaluation of 3-T MRI performed before initial transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in patients with high prostate-specific antigen and no previous biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197(5):W876-81.

Bonekamp D, Jacobs MA, El-Khouli R, Stoianovici D, Macura KJ. Advancements in MR imaging of the prostate: from diagnosis to interventions. RadioGraphics. 2011;31:677-703.

Hricak H, Dooms GC, McNeal JE, Mark AS, Marotti M, Avallone A, et al . MR imaging of the prostate gland: normal anatomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987;148(1):51-8.

Wang L, Mazaheri Y, Zhang J, Ishill NM, Kuroiwa K, Hricak H. Assessment of biologic aggressiveness of prostate cancer: correlation of MR signals intensity with Gleason grade after radical prostatectomy. Radiology. 2008;246 (1):168-76.

Langer DL, van der Kwast TH, Evans AJ, Sun L, Yaffe MJ, Trachtenberg J, et al . Intermixed normal tissue within prostate cancer: effect on MR imaging measurements of apparent diffusion coeffi cient and T2-sparse versus dense cancers. Radiology. 2008;249(3):900-8.

Kirkham AP, Emberton M, Allen C. How good is MRI at detecting and characterizing cancer within the prostate? Eur Urol. 2006;50(6):1163-74.

Cruz M, Tsuda K, Narumi Y, Kuroiwa Y, Nose T, Kojima Y, et al . Characterization of low-intensity lesions in the peripheral zone of prostate on pre-biopsy endorectal coil MR imaging. Eur Radiol. 2002;12(2):357-65 .

Qayyum A, Coakley FV, Lu Y, Olpin JD, Wu L, Yeh BM, et al. Organ confined prostate cancer: effect of prior transrectal biopsy on endorectal MRI and MR spectroscopic imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183(4):1079-83.

Akin O, Sala E, Moskowitz CS, Kuroiwa K, Ishill NM, Pucar D, et al. Transition zone prostate cancers: features, detection, localization, and staging at endorectal MR imaging. Radiology. 2006;239(3):784-92.

Bonekamp D, Macura KJ. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the prostate. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;19(6):273-84 .

Huisman HJ, Engelbrecht MR, Barentsz JO. Accurate estimation of pharmacokinetic contrast-enhanced dynamic MRI parameters of the prostate. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;13(4):607-14.

Alonzi R, Padhani AR, Allen C. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in prostate cancer. Eur J Radiol. 2007;63(3):335-50.

Barentsz JO, Engelbrecht M, Jager GJ, Witjes JA, de LaRosette J, van Der Sanden BP, et al. Fast dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of urinary bladder and prostate cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;10(3):295-304 .

Engelbrecht MR, Huisman HJ, Laheij RJ, Jager GJ, van Leenders GJ, Hulsbergen-Van De Kaa CA, et al. Discrimination of prostate cancer from normal peripheral zone and central gland tissue by using dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 2003;229(1):248-54 .

Padhani AR, Harvey CJ, Cosgrove DO. Angiogenesis imaging in the management of prostate cancer. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2005;2(12):596-607.

Franiel T, Lüdemann L, Rudolph B, Rehbein H, Staack A, Taupitz M, et al. Evaluation of normal prostate tissue, chronic prostatitis, and prostate cancer by quantitative perfusion analysis using a dynamic contrast-enhanced inversion-prepared dual contrast gradient echo sequence . Invest Radiol. 2008;43(7):481-7.

Jager GJ, Ruijter ET, van de Kaa CA, de la Rosette JJ, Oosterhof GO, Thornbury JR, et al. Local staging of prostate cancer with endorectal MR imaging: correlation with histopathology. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166(4):845-52 .

Stejskal EO, Tanner JE. Spin diffusion measurements: spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient. J Chem Phys. 1965;42(1):288-92 .

Jacobs MA, Ouwerkerk R, Petrowski K, Macura KJ. Diffusion-weighted imaging with apparent diffusion coeffi cient mapping and spectroscopy in prostate cancer. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;19(6):261-72 .

Somford DM, Fütterer JJ, Hambrock T, Barentsz JO. Diffusion and perfusion MR imaging of the prostate. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2008;16(4):685-95.

Kim CK, Park BK, Kim B. High-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging at 3 T to detect prostate cancer: comparisons between b values of 1,000 and 2,000 s/mm2. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(1):W33-7 .

Katahira K, Takahara T, Kwee TC, Oda S, Suzuki Y, Morishita S, et al . Ultra-high-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging for the detection of prostate cancer: evaluation in 201 cases with histopathological correlation. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(1):188-96.

Gibbs P, Tozer DJ, Liney GP, Turnbull LW. Comparison of quantitative T2 mapping and diffusion-weighted imaging in the normal and pathologic prostate. Magn Reson Med. 2001;46(6):1054-8 .

Hosseinzadeh K, Schwarz SD. Endorectal diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer to differentiate malignant and benign peripheral zone tissue. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;20(4):654-61.

Bammer R. Basic principles of diffusion weighted imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2003;45(3):169-84.

Cornel EB, Smits GA, Oosterhof GO, Karthaus HF, Deburyne FM, Schalken JA, et al. Characterization of human prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia and normal prostate by in vitro 1H and 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Urol. 1993;150(6):2019-24.

Mueller-Lisse UG, Scherr MK. Proton MR spectroscopy of the prostate. Eur J Radiol. 2007;63(3):351-60.

Scheenen TW, Klomp DW, Röll SA, Fütterer JJ, Barentsz JO, Heerschap A. Fast acquisition-weighted three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopic imaging of the human prostate. Magn Reson Med. 2004;52(1):80-8.

Heerschap A, Jager GJ, van der Graaf M, Barentsz JO, Ruijs SH. Proton MR spectroscopy of the normal human prostate with an endorectal coil and a double spin echo pulse sequence. Magn Reson Med. 1997;37(2):204-13 .

Scheenen TW, Gambarota G, Weiland E, Klomp DW, Fütterer JJ, Barentsz JO, et al . Optimal timing for in vivo 1H-MR spectroscopic imaging of the human prostate at 3T. Magn Reson Med. 2005;53(6):1268-74.