Single shot versus multiple shot antibiotic therapy in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery: our experience

Yogendra D. Shah, Pukur I. Thekdi, Soham Raut, K. G. Patel

Abstract


The aim of our study was to see the effect of single dose regime versus multi dose regime of antibiotic in laparoscopic surgery; in terms of type of laparoscopic surgery done, type and dose of intravenous antibiotic given and the occurrence of post operative complications like wound gape, stitch abscess, local pain and discharge from the wound in both the groups. The present study was prospective, observational and longitudinal. Protocol of the procedure was formed along with Performa, Patient Information Sheet and Informed Consent Form. The present study was carried out in surgery department of C.U Shah medical college, Surendranagar; Gujarat state. The study was carried out from 1st October 2010 till 31st August 2012. A total of one hundred and twenty patients undergoing emergency and elective laparoscopic surgery were included in our study. Case records of patients was recorded in the Performa containing demographic details, chief complaints, provisional diagnosis, details of operative procedures and drug details during the hospital stay. Follow up of the patients was done after one and three weeks and any change of regime of antibiotics was noted in respect to the symptoms or clinical findings like pain, fever, discharge, stitch abscess, wound gape. Out of 120 patients enrolled mean age was 38.88±14.19. Out of 120 patients in the study; 63 (52.5%) were Male and 57 (47.5%) were Female. Intravenous antibiotics were used in single dose or multiple dose in the patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures. Single dose of antibiotic was given to 65 patients and multiple dosage of antibiotics was given to 48 patients while 7 patients were converted from single to multiple dosage regime of antibiotics. Choice of a dosage of an appropriate antibiotic is of utmost importance in the treatment of the patients and the post operative outcomes. The adverse effects of the used antibiotics must also be kept into consideration while choosing the antibiotics and its dosage. Thus based on our study we conclude that single and multiple dosages of antibiotic regimes can be used for laparoscopic surgeries. However, single dose of antibiotics are more patient compliant, cost effective, less adverse effects and prevents emergence of antibiotic resistance.


Keywords


Single shot antibiotic, Multiple shot antibiotic, Laparoscopic surgery

Full Text:

PDF

References


Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control. 1999; 27:97-132.

Howe CW. Postoperative wound infections due to Staphylococcus aureus. N Engl J Med 1954; 251: 411-7.

Pulaski E. Discriminate antibiotic prophylaxis in elective surgery. Surg Gynec. Obst. 1959; 108: 385-8.

McKittrick LS, Wheelock FC Jr. The routine use of antibiotics in elective abdominal surgery. Surg Gynec Obst 1954; 99:376-7.

Andersen BR, Kallehave FL, Andersen HK. Antibiotics versus placebo for prevention of postoperative infection after appendicetomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(3): CD001439.

Shaukat Ali Shaikh, Mohmmad Iqbal, Ihtasham Muhmmad Ch. Comparison of Single Dose with Multiple Dose Antibiotic Prophylaxis with Cefuroxime in Open Cholecystectomy. Journal of Islamabad Medical and Dental College (JIMDC). 2012; 1211(1):2-5.

National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004. Am J Infect Control 2004; 32:470-85.

Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomized trial. Lancet. 2002; 359(9325): 2224-2229.

Leaper DJ, van Goor H, Reilly J, Petrosillo N, Geiss HK, Torres AJ, et al. Surgical site infection - a European perspective of incidence and economical burden. Int Wound Journal 2004; 1(4): 247-27.

DiPiro JT, Martindale RG, Bakst A, Vacani PF, and Watson P, Miller MT. Infection in surgical patients: effects on mortality, hospitalization, and post discharge care. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1998; 55(8): 777-81.

Frequency and risk factors of surgical site infections in general surgery ward of a tertiary care hospital of Karachi, Pakistan: Int J Infect Control 2011; 45(7): 234-36.

Kow L, Toouli J, Brookman J, McDonald PJ. Comparison of cefotaxime plus Metronidazole versus cefoxitin for prevention of wound infection after abdominal surgery. World J Surg. 1995; 19(5):680-686.

Juul P, Klaaborg K, Kronborg O. Single or multiple doses of metronidazole and ampicillin in elective colorectal surgery: a randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 1987; 30(7):526-528.

Rowe-Jones DC, Peel A, Kingston R, Shaw J, Teasdale C, Cole D. Single dose cefotaxime plus metronidazole versus three dose Cefuroxime plus Metronidazole as prophylaxis against wound infection in colorectal surgery: multicentre prospective randomized study. BMJ. 1990; 300 (6716):18-22.

Hakansson T, Raahave D, Hansen OH, Pedersen T. Effectiveness of single dose prophylaxis with cefotaxime and metronidazole compared with three doses of cefotaxime alone in elective colorectal surgery. Euro J Surg. 1993; 159(3):177-180.

Culver DH, Horan TC, Gayness RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, et al. Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Am J Med 1991; 91(3B): 152S-157S.

Byrne DJ, Phillips G, Napier A, Cuschieri A. The effect of whole body disinfection on intraoperative wound contamination. J Hosp Infect 1991; 18(2): 145-8.

Dietrich ES, Bieser U, and Frank U, et al. Ceftriaxone versus other cephalosporin for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis: a meta- analysis of 43 randomized controlled trials. Chemotherapy 2002; 48:49-56.