DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20163142

Comparative evaluation of slide agglutination and Widal tube agglutination test in detecting enteric fever among patients attending a tertiary care hospital in North India

Noor Jahan, Razia Khatoon, Amrita A, Sudhir Mehrotra, Swatantra Kumar

Abstract


Background: Enteric fever is a major public health problem with significant morbidity and mortality in developing countries. Although, isolation of causative organism from blood is the standard laboratory method, but due to frequent use of self-medication by patients, and its long turnaround time, it is seldom used, and enteric fever is usually diagnosed by using serological methods. Widal tube agglutination test is the standard serological test used, which is now a days replaced by slide agglutination test due to its convenience and rapidity. The present study was done to comparatively evaluate the slide agglutination and Widal tube agglutination test in detecting enteric fever.

Methods: A hospital based cross-sectional study was done from January to June 2016. A total of 117 patients with clinical presentation suggestive of enteric fever were included in the study whose venous blood was collected and serum was tested by both slide agglutination and Widal tube agglutination test.

Results: Out of 117 patients, slide agglutination test showed positive results in 39 (33.3%) samples, whereas, Widal tube agglutination test showed positive results in 23 (19.7%) samples only. The slide test had a sensitivity of 91.3%, specificity of 80.9%, positive predictive value of 53.8% and negative predictive value of 97.4% as compared to Widal tube agglutination test.

Conclusions: Due to high false positivity shown by slide test, it is suggested that serological diagnosis should not be made solely on the basis of slide test rather its results should be confirmed by using Widal tube agglutination test.


Keywords


Enteric fever, Slide agglutination test, Widal tube agglutination test, Sensitivity, Specificity

Full Text:

PDF

References


Lavanya V, Solabannavar SS, Sonth SB. Comparison of results obtained by semi-quantitative slide agglutination and tube Widal tests in the diagnosis of suspected typhoid fever cases. Int J Biol Med Res. 2013;4:3001-3.

Wain J, Hosoglu S. The laboratory diagnosis of enteric fever. J Infect Dev Cries. 2008;2:421-5.

Olsen SJ, Pruckler J, Bibb W, Thanh NTM, Trinh TM, Minh NT, et al. Evaluation of rapid diagnostic tests for typhoid fever. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:1885-9.

Khan S, Miah MRA, Haque S, Naheen CR. Comparison of results obtained by Widal agglutination test & polymerase chain reaction among clinically suspected typhoid fever cases. Bangladesh J Physiol Pharmacol. 2014;30:46-50.

Crump JA, Mintz LS. The global burden of typhoid fever. Bull World Health Org. 2004;82:346-53.

Ismail A. New advances in the diagnosis of typhoid and detection of typhoid carriers. Malaysian J Med Sci. 2000;7:3-8.

Keddy KH, Sooka A, Letsoalo ME, Hoyland G, Chiagnat CL, Morrissey AB, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of typhoid fever rapid antibody tests for laboratory diagnosis at two sub-Saharan African sites. Bull World Health Organ. 2011;89:640-7.

Gaikwad UN, Rajurkar M. Diagnostic efficacy of Widal slide agglutination test against Widal tube agglutination test in enteric fever. Int J Med Public Health. 2014;4:227-30.

Wilke A, Ergonul O, Bayar B. Widal test in diagnosis of typhoid fever in turkey. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2002;9:938-41.

Bijapur GAM, Kakkeri SR, Raysa NP, Usman SM. A study to determine significant titre values of widal test in the diagnosis of enteric fever for a population of North Kerala, India. Al Ameen J Med Sci. 2014;7:72-7.

Welch H, Lee MF. A rapid slide test for the serological diagnosis of typhoid and paratyphoid fevers. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1936;26:248-55.

Olopoenia LA, King AL. Widal agglutination test-100 years later: Still plagued by controversy. Postgrad Med J. 2000;76:80-4.

Kok TW, Worswick D, Gowans E. Some serological techniques for microbial and viral infections. In: Mackie & McCartney Practical Medical Microbiology, Collee JG, Fraser AG, Marmion BP, Simmons A, eds. 14th edition, Churchill Livingstone. 2012;180-182.

Mohanty SK, Ramana KV. Single and unpaired sera tube widal agglutination test in enteric fever. The Saudi J Gasteroenterol. 2007;13:213.

Brooks WA, Hossain A, Goswami D, Sharmeen AT, Nahar K, Alam K, et al. Bacteremic typhoid fever in children in an urban slum, Bangladesh. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:326-9.

Tupasi TE, Lucas-Aquino R, Mendoza MT, Tuazon CU, Lolekha S. Clinical application of the Widal test. Phil J Microbiol Infect Dis. 1991;20:23-6.

Altman DG, Bland JM. Diagnostic tests 2: predictive values. BMJ. 1994;309:102.