DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20171819

Effect of antihistaminics on amplitude of rabbit gut

Rashmi Prakash, Vinay Singh, Devesh Kumar, Jamal Haider, A. B. Asthana, Pooja Tripathi Pandey

Abstract


Background: The small intestine, like the rest of the gastrointestinal tract, is an intelligent organ. It generates a wide variety of motor patterns to meet motility requirements in different situations. Its basic motor function after a meal is to mix the chyme with exocrine and intestinal secretions, agitate its contents too.

Methods: In vitro study is done to explore the effect of 1st generation antihistaminic (chlorpheniramine maleate) and second generation antihistaminic (Fexofenadine) on amplitude of gut motility by isolated rabbit gut preparation on Dale’s Organ bath, part of terminal ileum is used for study. Eight rabbits weighing 2 to 4.5 kg were used for study. The effect of antihistaminic observed that both drugs reduce amplitude.

Results: The effect of Chlorpheniramine malete and Fexofenadine on amplitude observed and it found that both decrease the amplitude significantly.

Conclusions: This study establishes a correlation between amplitude of gut and effect of antihistaminic suggests that antihistaminic drug both first generation and second generation decreases the amplitude of gut motility with a significant response.

Keywords


Amplitude, Antihistaminic drug, Chlorpheniramine maleate, Fexofenadine, Gut motility

Full Text:

PDF

References


Otterson MF, Sarr MG. Normal Physiology of small intestinal motility. Surg Clin North Am. 1993;73(6):1173-92.

Sarna SK, Otterson MF. Gastrointestinal motility: some basic concepts. Pharmacology; 1988;36(Suppl 1):7-14.

Bowen DVM. Pathophysiology of the Digestive. System" Retrieved. 2008-3-19.

Silverthorne, Dee Unglaub. Human Physiology: An Integrated Approach. Benjamin Cummings. 2006. ISBN 0-8053-6851-5.

Dietrich C, Kilbinger H. Prejunctional MI and Post junctional M3 muscarinic receptors in circular muscle of guinea-pig ileum. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1995;351:237-43.

Giraldo E, Monferini E, Ladinsky H, Hammer R. Muscarinic receptor heterogeneity in guinea pig intestinal smooth muscle: binding studies with AF-DX 116. Eur J Pharmacol. 1987;144:475-7.

Kawashima K, Fujimoto K, Suzuki T, Oohata H. Pharmacological differentiation of presynaptic Mi muscarinic receptors modulating acetylcholine release from postsynaptic muscarinic receptors in guinea pig ileum. Gen Pharmacol. 1990;21:17-21.

Soejima O, Katsuragi T, Furukawa T. Opposite modulation by muscarinic M and M3 receptors of acetylcholine release from guinea pig ileum as measured directly. Eur J Pharmacol. 1993;249:1-6.

Barocelli E, Ballabeni V, Chiavarini M, Molina E, Lavezzo A, Impicciatore M. Muscarinic M1 and M3 receptor antagonist effects of a new pirenzepine analogue in isolated guinea-pig ileal longitudinal muscle-myenteric plexus. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1994;254:151-7.

De Vries P, Soret R, Suply E, Heloury Y, Neunlist M, Roberts RR et al. Postnatal development of myenteric neurochemical phenotype and impact on neuromuscular transmission in the rat colon. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2010;299:G539-47.