Published: 2017-02-20

The effect of general anaesthesia versus conscious sedation in dosimetric distribution of intracavitary radiotherapy in cervical cancer patients

Narendra Rathore, Arvind Kumar Shukla, Poonam Chand Bana, Abhay Kumar Jain, Vikram Singh Rajpurohit, Kiran Intodia


Background: Majority of Indian patients presents in locally advanced stage and most of them treated by combination of external teletherapy and intracavitary brachytherapy (ICRT). Because of deficient infrastructure, the waiting period is generally long at existing caner canters. Hence ICRT may be done in conscious sedation to treat more patients by avoiding time consuming general anaesthesia. The aim of this study is to know the effect of general anaesthesia vs. conscious sedation in dosimetric distribution in brachytherapy and its feasibility.

Methods: Total 80 ICRT applications were randomized to general anaesthesia (GA) and conscious sedation (CS) groups. Fletcher suit type of applicators was used and dose delivery equipment was cobalt 60 high dose rate remote after loading brachytherapy unit. In CS group, injection midazolam 0.5-8mg (median 2.5mg) in the form of slow i.v. infusion was used along with antiemetic support.

Results: Total 6 parameters were analyzed. e.g., Dose to point A1, Dose to point A2, Bladder max dose, Bladder mean dose, Rectal max dose and Rectal mean dose. The dose distribution was found similar both   groups and it did not depend on type of anaesthesia.

Conclusions: The high volume centers of developing countries are most suitable candidate to opt conscious sedation to perform ICRT to treat more cancer cervix patients in same time frame.


Cancer cervix, Conscious sedation, Intracavitary brachytherapy

Full Text:



Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136:E359-86

Landoni F, Maneo A, Colombo A, Placa F, Milani R, Perego P. Randomised study of radical surgery v/s radiotherapy for IB- IIA crvicel cancer. Lancet 1997;350(9077):535-40.

Vale C, Tierney JF, Stewart LA. Chemotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-Analysis Collaboration. Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 18 randomized trials. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:5802-12.

Au-Yeung G, Mileshkin L, Bernshaw DM. Radiation with cisplatin for locally advanced cervix cancer: The experience of a tertiary cancer centre. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2013; 57: 97-104.

Viswanathan AN, Thomadsen B. American brachytherapy society consensus guidelines for carcinoma cervix. Brachytherapy. 2012;11:33-46.

Benrath J, Langenecker SK, Hupfl M. Anaesthesia for brachytherapy-51/2 yrs of experience in 1622 procedures. Br J Anaeth. 2006;96(2):195-200.

Banerjee S, Mahantshetty U, Shrivastava SK. Brachytherapy in India- a long road ahead. J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2014;6(3):331-5.

Nikam DS, Jagtap AS, Vinothraj R. Resolving the brachytherapy challenges with government funded hospital. Indian J Cancer. 2016;53(1):132-4.

Bhanabhai H, Samant REC. Pain assessment during conscious sedation for cervical cancer HDR brachytherapy. Curr oncol. 2013;20(4):e307-10.

Dose and Volume Specification for Reporting Intracavitary Therapy in Gynecology. ICRU Report No 38.1985.

Gandhi AK, Kumar P, Bhandari M. Burden of preventable cancers in India: Time to strike the cancer epidemic. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2016;30:S1110.

Sharma DN, Chaudhari P, Sharma S. Comparison of high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy dosimetry with and without anesthesia in patients with cervical carcinoma. J Applied Clin Med Phys. 2014;5(2):110-2.