DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20164187

A prospective randomized study for comparison of haemodynamic changes and recovery characteristics with propofol and sevoflurane anaesthesia during laparoscopic cholecystectomies

Arvind Khare, Veena Mathur, Kavita Jain, Surendra K. Sethi, Deepak Garg, Raghunath Vishnoi

Abstract


Background: Day care laparoscopic surgical procedures are rapidly increasing nowadays. Rapid emergence and early recovery from anaesthesia with minimal complications are desired. Both propofol and sevoflurane meet above criteria and established as agents of choice in laparoscopic surgeries for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia. So this study aimed to compare sevoflurane with propofol for intraoperative haemodynamic changes with postoperative recovery profile in patient’s undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomies under general anaesthesia.

Methods: In this prospective randomized study, sixty patients of either sex, 18-60 years with ASA grade 1 and 2 scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomies under general anaesthesia were randomly allocated into two groups. In Group S, patients were maintained on sevoflurane anaesthesia (0.5-2.5%) while in Group P, patients were maintained with propofol infusion (75-125 µg/kg/min) along with O2 (50%) and N2O (50%).The intraoperative haemodynamic parameters, recovery characteristics and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were observed in both groups.

Results: The mean baseline haemodynamic parameters (HR, SBP, DBP, MBP, SpO2 and EtCO2) were comparable in both groups, (P>0.05). No significant difference in HR was at observed any time interval, P>0.05, however, SBP, DBP and MBP were significantly lower in propofol group at different time intervals, P<0.05, but clinically not significant and patients remained haemodynamically stable in both groups. The mean time for all recovery characteristics were significantly shorter in sevoflurane group as compared to propofol group, (P<0.01). However the incidence of PONV was significantly more in sevoflurane group.

Conclusions: Sevoflurane can be used as an effective alternative to propofol for maintenance of anaesthesia in day care laparoscopic procedures as it has better recovery profile with stable haemodynamic parameters.


Keywords


Cholecystectomy, Haemodynamics, Laparoscopic, Propofol, Recovery characteristics, Sevoflurane

Full Text:

PDF

References


Shah A, Adaroja RN. Comparison of haemodynamic changes with propofol and sevoflurane anaesthesia during laparoscopic surgery. Nati J Med Res. 2011;1(2):76-9.

Singh SK, Kumar A, Mahajan R, Katyal S, Mann S. Comparison of recovery profile for propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia in cases of open cholecystectomy. Anesth Essays Res. 2013;7:386-9.

Erk G, Erdogan G, Sahin F, Taspinar V, Dikmen B. Anesthesia for laparoscopic surgery a comparative evaluation-desflurane/sevoflurane vs propofol. Middle East J Anesthesiol. 2007;19(3):553-62.

Gupta A, Stieres T, Zuckerman R, Sakima N, Parker SD. Comparison of recovery profile after ambulatory anesthesia with propofol, isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane. A systemic review. Anesth Analg. 2004;98(3):632-41.

Joo HS, Perks WJ. Sevoflurane versus propofol for anesthetic induction: a meta-analysis.Anesth Analg. 2000;91:213-9.

Robinson BJ, Uhrich TD, Ebert TJ. A review of recovery from sevoflurane anaesthesia: comparisons with isoflurane and propofol including meta-analysis.Acta Anaesthesia Scandinavia 1999;43:185-90.

Song D, Joshi GP, White PF. Fast track eligibility after ambulatory anesthesia. A comparison of desflurane, sevoflurane and propofol. Anesth Analg. 1998;86:267-73.

Fredman B, Nathanson MH, Smith I, Wang J, Klein K, White PF. Sevoflurane for outpatient anesthesia: A comparison with propofol. Anesth Analg. 1995;81:823-8.

Smith I, Nathanson M, White PF. Sevoflurane – A long-awaited volatile anaesthetic. Br J Anaesth. 1996;76:435-45.

Thwaites A, Edmends S, Smith I. Inhalation induction with sevoflurane:A double-blind comparison with propofol. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78:356-61.

Reves JG, Glass P, Lubarsky DA, McEvoy MD.2010.Intravenous anesthesia. In: Miller RD, editor. Anesthesia. 7th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone. 719-58.

Doi M, Ikeda K. Airway irritation produced by volatile anaesthetics during brief inhalation: comparison of halothane, enflurane, isoflurane and sevoflurane. Canadian J Anesth.. 1993;40:122-6.

Lu CC ,Tsai CS, Ho ST, Chen WY, Wong CS, Wang JJ, et al. Pharmacokinetics of sevoflurane uptake into the brain and body. Anaesthesia. 2003;58:951-956

Juckenhöfel S, Feisel C, Schmitt HJ, Biedler A. TIVA with propofol remifentanil or balanced anesthesia with sevoflurane fentanyl in laporoscopic operations. Hemodynamics, awakening and adverse effects. Anaesthesist. 1999;48:807-12

Yao XH, Zhou P, Xiao ZK, Wang B, Chen CY, Qing ZH, et al. Comparison of target controlled propofol infusion and sevoflurane inhalational anaesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Bao. 2007;27(8):1280-1,1284.

Jellish WS, Lien CA, Fontenot HJ, Hall R. The comparative effects of sevoflurane versus propofol in the induction and maintenance of anesthesia in adult patients.Anesth Analg. 1996;82:479-85.

Orhon ZN, Devrim S, Celik M, Dogan Y, Yildirim A, Basok EK. Comparison of recovery profiles of propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia with bispectral index monitoring in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013;64:223-8.

Samantaray A, Rao MH. Comparative effects of propofol infusion versus sevoflurane for maintenance of anesthesia for spine surgery. Internet J Anesthesiol. 2007;11(2).

Husedzinović I, Tonković D, Barisin S, Bradić N, Gasparović S. Hemodynamic differences in sevoflurane versus propofol anesthesia. Coll Antropol. 2003;27:205-12.

Wandel C, Neff S, Böhrer H, Browne A, Motsch J, Martin E. Recovery characteristics following anaesthesia with sevoflurane or propofol in adults undergoing out-patient surgery. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1995;48:185-8.

Larsen B, Seitz A, Larsen R. Recovery of cognitive function after remifentanil-propofol anesthesia: A comparison with desflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2000;90:168-74.

Philip BK, Kallar SK, Bobetz MS, Scheller MS, Wetchler BV. A multicenter comparison of maintenance and recovery with sevoflurance or isoflurance for adult ambulatory anesthesia. The Sevoflurane Multicenter Ambulatory Group. Anesth Analg. 1996;83:314-9.

Shinn HK, Lee MH, Moon SY, Hwang SI, Lee CS, Lim HK, et al. Postoperative nausea and vomiting after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery: comparison between propofol and sevoflurane. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2011;60:36-40.

Apfel CC, Stoecklein K, Lipfert P. PONV: A problem of inhalational anaesthesia? Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2005;19:485-500.

Gupta A, Stierer T, Zuckerman R, Sakima N, Parker SD, Fleisher LA. Comparison of recovery profile after ambulatory anesthesia with Propofol, Isoflurane and Desflurane: A systematic review. Anesth Analg. 2004;98:632-41.