DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20172434

Pethidine and bupivacaine spinal anaesthesia: a comparative evaluation of postoperative complications and recovery profile

Mbuotidem M. Udonquak, Queeneth N. Kalu, Atim I. Eshiet

Abstract


Background: Bupivacaine is commonly used as a sole agent for spinal anaesthesia unlike Pethidine. This study compares the immediate postoperative complications and recovery profile following spinal anaesthesia with pethidine and bupivacaine.

Methods: Fifty-two patients who required short duration surgical procedures below the umbilicus were randomized to receive spinal anaesthesia with pethidine 1mg/Kg and 2.5 mL 0.5% bupivacaine. Time to recovery of pin prick sensation at S2, plantar flexion, proprioception of the big toe, and full motor recovery were compared for the two agents. Complications of pain, sedation, nausea and vomiting, pruritus and urinary retention in the immediate postoperative period were also compared.

Results: Comparing Pethidine and Bupivacaine, time to return of pinprick sensation at S2 was 94.62±20.25 and 205.96±31.05 minutes respectively; return of plantar flexion was 92.88±12.01 and 193.85±39.56 minutes respectively; recovery of proprioception of the big toe was 31.15±9.41 and 172.50±42.70 minutes respectively; complete motor recovery was 47.89±14.08 and 221.73±44.72 minutes respectively. All the differences in recovery times were statistically significant (p<0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of pain and sedation. Only 4 (15.38%) patients in the Bupivacaine group experienced mild pain. There was no incident of nausea and vomiting. However, pethidine group experienced pruritus (19.22%) and bupivacaine group none. Bupivacaine group also had urinary retention (11.54%), while pethidine group had none. These differences were statistically significant (p=0.01).

Conclusions: Pethidine exhibited a shorter recovery profile than Bupivacaine and also caused no significant complication in the immediate postoperative period.


Keywords


Bupivacaine, Pethidine, Postoperative complications, Recovery, Spinal anaesthesia

Full Text:

PDF

References


Wagner LE, Eaton M, Salas S, Gingrich KJ. Meperidine and Lidocaine Block Recombinant Voltage-dependent Na+ Channels: Evidence that Meperidine is a Local Anesthetic. Anesthesiology. 1999;91:1481.

Wolff M, Olschewski A, Vogel W, Hempelmann G. Meperidine suppresses the excitability of spinal dorsal horn neurons. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:947-55.

Marshall SI, Chung F. Discharge criteria and complications after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg. 1999;88:508.

Shephard DAE. Harvey Cushing and anaesthesia. Can J Anaesth. 1965;12:431-42.

Tarkilla P, Huhtahla J, Tuominen M. Transient radicular irritation after spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric 5% lignocaine. Br J Anaesth. 1995;74:328-9.

Morgan GE Jr, Mikhail MS, Murray MJ, Larson CP Jr. Clinical Anesthesiology. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2002:164.

Ehikhametalor KO, Nelson M, Intrathecal Pethidine as a Sole anaesthetic agent for operative procedures of the lower limb, inguinal area and perineum. West Indian Med J. 2001;50:313-6.

Grace D, Fee JPH. Anaesthesia and adverse effects after intrathecal pethidine hydrochloride for urological surgery. Anaesthesia. 1995;50:1036-40.

Chaudhari LS, Kane DG, Shivkumar B, Kamath SK. Comparative study of intrathecal pethidine versus lignocaine as an anaesthetic and a postoperative analgesic for perineal surgery. J Postgrad Med. 1996;42:43-5.

Patel D, Janardhan Y, Merai B, Robalino J, Shevde K. Comparison of intrathecal mepridine and lidocaine in endoscopic urological procedures. Can J Anaesth. 1990;37:567-70.

Fukuda K, Intravenous Opioid Anesthetics. In: Miller RD, Fleisher LA, Johns RA, Savarese JJ, Wiener-Kronish JP, Young WL, eds. Miller’s Anesthesia. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2005:379-435.

Sasada MP, Smith SP. Drugs. In: Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. Kent: Castle House Publications Ltd; 1990:32-33.

Famewo CE, Naguib M. Spinal anaesthesia with meperidine as the sole agent. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1985;32:533-7.

Hansen D, Hansen S. The effects of three graded doses meperidine for spinal anesthesia in African Men. Anesth Analg. 1999;88:827-30.

Hocking G, Wildsmit JA. Intrathecal Drug Spread. Br J Anaesth. 2004;93:568-78.

Li S, Coloma M, White PF, Watcha MF, Chiu JW, L, Huber PJ Jr. Comparison of the costs and recovery profiles of three anesthetic techniques for ambulatory anorectal surgery. Anesthesiology. 2000;93:1225-30.

Shrestha BR, Maharjan SK, Thapa C. Comparative study between bupivacaine heavy vs pethidine intrathecally to study early haemodynamic changes and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing caesarean section. Kathmandu Univ Med J. 2007;5:166-72.

Acalovschi I, Ene V, Lorinczi E, Nicolaus F. Saddle block with Pethidine for perineal operations. Br J Anaesth. 1986;58(9):1012-6.

Raeder JC. Regional Anesthesia in Ambulatory Surgery. Can J Anaesth. 2001;48(1):51-4.

Pollock JE, Neal JM, Spencer S, Burkhead D, Polissar N. Sedation during Spinal Anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2000;93:728-34.

Eappen S, Kissin I. Effect of Subarachnoid Bupivacaine block on anesthetic requirements for thiopental in rats. Anesthesiology. 1998;88:1036-42.

Kalu QN, Eshiet AI, Akpan SG, Monjok E. Postoperative nausea and vomiting following general anaesthesia: a prospective study on surgical patients in the university of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria. Br J Med Med Res. 2015;9(12):1-12.

Koivuranta M, Laara E, Snare L. A survey of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anaesthesia. 1997;52:443-9.

Parmar M, Patel H, Kantharia B. Intrathecal pethidine as a sole agent for spinal anaesthesia and analgesia- A comparison with 5% lignocaine. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2017;6:291-4.

Roy J, Girard M, Drolet P. Intrathecal meperidine decreases shivering during caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia. Anaesth Analg. 2004:98:230-4.