Published: 2017-06-24

Comparison of microwave decalcification with conventional decalcification method by using different decalcifying agents

Ahmad Danish Rehan, Sonal Saigal, Ankur Bhargava, Uddipan Kumar, Pragya Thakur, Tasnim Kausar


Background: In routine histopathology, decalcification of teeth is an essential and important step during tissue processing. The present study was attempted to decalcify teeth using microwave method and to compare it with conventional decalcification method. The aim of the study was to compare microwave decalcification with conventional decalcification method with respect to the speed of decalcification, preservation of tissue structure, and efficacy of staining.

Methods: In our study, the total sample size used for both routine and microwave decalcification was 30 premolar teeth. The three solutions were diluting nitric acid (5%), formic acid (5%), and EDTA (14%).

Results: The results in the present study confirmed the fact that the microwave method using nitric acid was indeed the fastest decalcifying method needing just about 4 days for premolars, compared with routine decalcification. The results also showed that the overall structural details and good staining characteristics were better in teeth decalcified by 5% nitric acid in comparison to EDTA and formic acid in both the methods used. But nitric acid showed good staining details in microwave method in comparison to conventional method.

Conclusions: 5% nitric acid by microwave method proved to be the best decalcifying agent as it was fast and gave good structural details and staining characteristics.



Decalcification, Microwave oven, Teeth

Full Text:



Olympic charter published by International Olympic committee, Lausanne, Switzerland. 2011:9-21.

Lynch SR. Lynch′s Medical Laboratory Technology. 4th ed. London: W. B. Saunders; 1983:937-44.

Bhaskar SN. Orban's Oral Histology and Embryology, 10th ed. New Delhi: CBS Publishers and Distributors; 2006:349-354.

Callis GM, Bancroft JD. Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques, 6th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2008:338-360.

Roncaroli F, Mussa B, Bussolati G. Microwave oven for improved tissue fixation and decalcification. Pathologica. 1991;83:307-10.

Pitol DL, Caetano FH, Lunardi LO. Microwave induced fast decalcification of rat bone for electron microscopic analysis: An ultrastructural and cytochemical study. Braz Dent J. 2007;18:153-7.

De-Deus G, Reis C, Fidel S, Fidel RA, Paciornik S. Longitudinal and quantitative evaluation of dentin demineralization when subjected to EDTA, EDTAC, and citric acid: A co-site digital optical microscopy study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;105:391-7.

Mathai AM, Naik R, Pai MR, Rai S, Baliga P. Microwave histoprocessing versus conventional histoprocessing. Ind J Pathol Microbiol. 2008;51:12-6.

Vongsavan N, Matthews B, Harrison GK. Decalcification of teeth in a microwave oven. Histochem J. 1990;22:377-80.

Moore RJ. Bone. In: Woods AE, Ellis RC, editors. Laboratory Histopathology. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1994:7-10.

Culling CF, Allison RT, Barr WT. Structural pathology technique. 4th ed. London: Butterworths; 1985: 408-30.

Sangeetha R, Uma K, Chandavarkar V. Comparison of routine decalcification methods with microwave decalcification of bone and teeth. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2013;17:386-91.