Role of robotics in trauma and orthopaedics
Keywords:Advances, Robotics, Trauma and orthopaedics
There is always an ardent desire to obtain the best outcome in any surgery. To improve the quality of life of their patient is amongst the top priorities of most orthopaedic surgeons. It is a big challenge to accurately match a perfect pre-operative planning and obtain that intra operatively. Robotic technology is fast evolving in many surgical branches with orthopaedics as well, but limited with the price tag it comes with. Nevertheless, robotics is gaining momentum with some encouraging short-term results. Robotic surgery can offer significant improvement in surgical planning, accurate implant or prosthetic placement, which provide good outcomes that ultimately enhance patient safety. We review the various robotic advancements in the field of trauma and orthopaedic surgery.
Lang JE, Mannava S, Floyd AJ, Goddard MS, Smith BP, Mofidi A, et al. Robotic systems in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(10):1296-9.
Karthik K, Colegate-Stone T, Dasgupta P, Tavakkolizadeh A, Sinha J. Robotic surgery in trauma and orthopaedics: a systematic review. Bone Joint J. 2015;97-B(3):292-9.
Oszwald M, Westphal R, Klepzig D, Khalafi A, Gaulke R, Muller CW, et al. Robotized access to the medullary cavity for intramedullary nailing of the femur. Technol Health Care. 2010;18(3):173-80.
Lei H, Sheng L, Manyi W, Junqiang W, Wenyong L. A biplanar robot navigation system for the distal locking of intramedullary nails. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg. 2010;6(1):61-5.
Hananouchi T, Sugano N, Nishii T, Nakamura N, Miki H, Kakimoto A, et al. Effect of robotic milling on periprosthetic bone remodelling. J Orthopaedic Res. 2007;25(8):1062-9.
Domb BG, El Bitar YF, Sadik AY, Stake CE, Botser IB. Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional acetabular cup placement in THA: a matched-pair controlled study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(1):329-36.
El Bitar YF, Jackson TJ, Lindner D, Botser IB, Stake CE, Domb BG. Predictive value of robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2015;38(1):e31-7.
Hagio K, Sugano N, Takashina M, Nishii T, Yoshikawa H, Ochi T. Effectiveness of the ROBODOC system in preventing intraoperative pulmonary embolism. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003;74(3):264-9.
Martelli M, Marcacci M, Nofrini L, La Palombara F, Malvisi A, Iacono F, et al. Computer- and robot-assisted total knee replacement: analysis of a new surgical procedure. Ann Biomed Eng. 2000;28(9):1146-53.
Jakopec M, Harris SJ, Rodriguez y Baena F, Gomes P, Cobb J, Davies BL. The first clinical application of a? hands-on? robotic knee surgery system. Comput Aided Surg. 2001;6(6):329-39.
ROBODOC®: Professionals. Available at http://www.robodoc.com/pro_about_faqs.html.
De Steiger RN, Liu Y-L, Graves SE. Computer navigation for total knee arthroplasty reduces revision rate for patients less than sixty-five years of age. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(8):635-42.
Coon TM. Integrating robotic technology into the operating room. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2009;38(2):7-9.
We believe in healing through innovation. Available at https://www.mazorrobotics.com/.
Devito DP, Kaplan L, Dietl R, Pfeiffer M, Horne D, Silberstein B, et al. Clinical acceptance and accuracy assessment of spinal implants guided with spine assist surgical robot. Spine. 2010;35(24):2109-15.
Cobb J, Henckel J, Gomes P, Harris S, Jakopec M, Rodriguez F, et al. Hands-on robotic unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2006;88:188-97.
Paul S, McCulloch P, Sedrakyan A. Robotic surgery: revisiting “no innovation without evaluation.” BMJ. 2013;346.
Swank ML, Alkire M, Conditt M, Lonner JH. Technology and cost-effectiveness in knee arthroplasty: computer navigation and robotics. Am J Orthop. 2009;38(2):32-6
Di Giulio E, Fregonese D, Casetti T, Cestari R, Chilovi F, D’Ambra G, et al. Training with a computer-based simulator achieves basic manual skills required for upper endoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60(2):196-200.
Siebel T, Käfer W. Clinical outcome after robot-assisted versus conventional implanted hip replacement: Prospektive, kontrollierte Untersuchung Prospective, controlled examination of 71 patients. Z Orthop Your border. 2005;143(4):391-8.