A comparative study between abdominal plain radiography and ultrasonography in non-traumatic acute abdominal emergencies in tertiary care hospital


  • Chiranjeev Kumar Gathwal Department of Radio-Diagnosis,BPS GMC (W), Khanpur, Sonepat, Haryana, India
  • Monika B. Gathwal Department of Pathology, BPS GMC (W), Khanpur, Sonepat, Haryana, India
  • Shreya Garg 3rd YEAR MBBS student, BPS GMC (W), Khanpur, Sonepat, Haryana, India
  • Yogita Kumari MSC Nursing LNJP Hospital, New Delhi, India
  • Kulvinder Singh Health map Diagnostic, BPS GMC (W), Khanpur, Sonepat, Haryana, India




Acute abdomen, Non traumatic, Plain radiography, Ultrasound


Background: Acute abdomen is a loose term frequently used to describe the acute abdominal pain in a subgroup of patients who are seriously ill developing suddenly, over a period of several hours or few days.

Methods: It was a prospective comparative study between abdominal plain radiography and ultrasonography in non-traumatic acute abdominal emergencies in Tertiary Care Hospital.

Results: All the included patients (140) were imaged with abdominal X-rays series (AAS) and Ultrasonography (US) by different blinded radiologists without conveying results to either. Final diagnosis was made on the basis of clinical findings / laboratory or biochemical findings /radiological evaluation /therapeutic response / operative findings / histopathological examination. The entire data was collected, recorded and statistically analyzed as per objectives. GIT system was most commonly involved, in 75/140 cases (53.57%). Most common diagnoses were acute appendicitis, KUB calculus disease and acute cholecystitis seen in 32/140 (22.86%), 24/140 (17.14%) and 21 (15%) cases respectively. US supersedes Provisional clinical diagnosis and Radiographic evaluation in diagnosing acute abdominal conditions with Sensitivity, Positive Predictive Value, False positive rate, False Negative rate and Diagnostic Accuracy as 90.71, 100, 0 ,9.28 and 90.71 percent respectively.

Conclusions: We concluded that Plain X rays can be used as screening modality in the diagnosis of acute abdominal emergencies; however ultrasound examination is cheaper, non-invasive, quick, reliable and highly accurate modality in diagnosing the exact cause of pain and its origin in a patient presenting with an acute abdomen and thus helps the physician or surgeon to plan the timely management.


Gupta K, Bhandari RK, Chander R. Comparative study of plain abdomen and ultrasound in non-traumatic acute abdomen Gastrointestin. Radiol. 2005;5(1):109-15.

Spigelman AD. Acute abdominal conditions. In: Henry MM, Thompson JN editors. Clinical surgery 2nd edition. China: Elsevier Saunders. 2005;365-6.

Smith JT, Mbchb M, Parachemant C. The role of imaging in the management of adults with nontraumatic acute abdominal pain. 2009;21:1-19.

Joshi MS. Ultrasonography of the acute abdomen. 1997. Available from: url:http:// www. Starprogram.de/ data-star-program/ upload/ star_abstracts_180_joshi-acute-abdomen .pdf

Walsh PF, Crawford D, Crossling FT. The value of immediate ultrasound in acute abdominal conditions: a critical appraisal. Clin Radiol. 1990;42:47-9.

Andrew BM, Lane MJ, Robert TG, Harry A, Claypool SK, Douglas SK, et al. Nontraumatic Acute Abdominal Pain Unenhanced Helical CT Compared with Three View Acute Abdominal Series Radiol. 2005;237:114-22.

Siewert B, Raptopoulos V, Mueller MF, Rosen MP, Steer M. Impact of CT on diagnosis and management of acute abdomen in patients initially treated without surgery. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168:173-8.

Rosen MP, Sands DZ, Longmaid HE, Reynolds KF, Wagner M, Raptopoulos V. Impact of abdominal CT on the management of patients presenting to the emergency department with acute abdominal pain. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:1391-6.

Powers JH. Acute appendicitis during the later decades of life: some remarks on the incidence of the disease in a rural area. Ann Surg. 1943;117:221-33.

MacKersie AB, Lane MJ, Gerhardt RT. Nontraumatic acute abdominal pain: unenhanced helical CT compared with threeview acute abdominal series. Radiology. 2005;237:114-22.

Kellow ZS, MacInnes M, Kurzencwyg D. The role of abdominal radiography in the evaluation of the nontrauma emergency patient. Radiology 2008;248:887-93.

Ahn SH, Mayo-Smith WW, Murphy BL, Reinert SE, Cronan JJ. Acute Nontraumatic abdominal pain in adult patients: abdominal radiography compared with CT evaluation. Radiology. 2002;225:159-64.

Otero HJ, Ondategui-Parra S, Erturk SM, Ochoa RE, Gonzalez-Beicos A, Ros PR. Imaging utilization in the management of appendicitis and its impact on hospital charges. Emerg Radiol 2008;15:23-8.

Rao PM, Rhea JT, Rao JA, Conn AK. Plain abdominal radiography in clinically suspected appendicitis: diagnostic yield, resource use, and comparison with CT. Am J Emerg Med. 1999;17:325-8.

Anyanwu AC, Moalypour SM. Are abdominal radiographs still overutilised in the assessment of acute abdominal pain? a district general hospital audit. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1998;43:267-70.

Van Randen A, Lameris W, Bossuyt PM, Boermeester MA, Stoker J. Comparison of accuracy of ultrasonography and computed tomography in patients with acute abdominal pain at the emergency department. In: Radiological Society of North America scientific assembly and annual meeting program. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America. 2009;519.

Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography: an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2277-84.

Puylaert JB, Rutgers PH, Lalisang RI. A prospective study of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of appendicitis. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:666-9.

McGrath FP, Keeling F. The role of early sonography in the management of the acute abdomen. Clin Radiol. 1991;44:172-4.

Allemann F, Cassina P, Rothlin M, Largiader F. Ultrasound scans done by surgeons for patients with acute abdominal pain: a prospective study. Eur J Surg. 1999;165: 966-70.

Dhillon S, Halligan S, Goh V, Matravers P, Chambers A, Remedios D. The therapeutic impact of abdominal ultrasound in patients with acute abdominal symptoms. Clin Radiol. 2002;57:268-71.

SY Choi TW Wong, CC Lau, E Liang, YK Fu, J Khoo S. A study on the use of abdominal X-ray in an emergency department, Hong Kong J.Emerg.Med. 2002;9:30-3.

Raman S, Somasekar K, Winter RK, Lewis MH. Are we overusing ultrasound in non-traumatic acute abdominal pain? , Postgrad Med J. 2004;80:177-9.

Smith JE, Hall EJ. The use of plain abdominal x rays in the emergency department Emerg. Med. J. 2009;26:160-3.

Al-Khusheh M, Iqbal SJ, Gupta A, Asalieh H, Khalifa K, Habeeb K. The role of abdominal X-rays in the investigation of suspected acute appendicitis. J Med Med Sci. 2011;2(11):1216-20.

Gans SL, Stoker J, Boermeester MA. Plain abdominal radiography in acute abdominal pain; past, present, and future. Inter J Gen Med. 2012;5:525-33.

Sharma P, Sidharth, Singh BP, Singh D, Gupta. A Comparative Study between Plain Radiography and Ultrasound Abdomen in Non-Traumatic Surgical Acute Abdominal Conditions NJR. 2012;2(3).

Karmakar S, Ghosh SK, Ghosh M. Acute Abdomen – Status of Diagnosis in a Rural Based Teaching Hospital. J Evolution Med dental Sci. 2013;2(52):10107.




How to Cite

Gathwal, C. K., Gathwal, M. B., Garg, S., Kumari, Y., & Singh, K. (2016). A comparative study between abdominal plain radiography and ultrasonography in non-traumatic acute abdominal emergencies in tertiary care hospital. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 5(1), 113–123. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20164533



Original Research Articles