DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20173981

Cost variation analysis of antimalarial drugs available in India

Lalit Kumar, Jyoti Kumar Dinkar, Lalit Mohan, Harihar Dikshit

Abstract


Background: Malaria has been a problem in India for centuries. There are innumerable brands of antimalarial present in the market. Malaria can be extremely fatal if not treated promptly. Costly drugs can lead to economic burden which results in decreased compliance or even non-compliance. Non-compliance leads to incomplete treatment which tends to increase morbidity. Increase in the patient medication cost was found to be associated with decreased adherence to prescription medication. Hence this study was done to assess the cost variation of malaria therapy.

Methods: The maximum and minimum price of each brand of the drug in INR was noted by using CIMS January to April 2017 edition and Drug Today January to March 2017, Vol 2. The cost ratio and the percentage cost variation for individual drug brands was calculated. The cost of 10 tablets was calculated in case of oral drug and the cost of 1 ampoule or vial was noted in case of injectable drug. At last the cost ratio and % cost variation of various brands was compared.

Results: The analysis of data reflected a considerable cost variation among antimalarial drugs. Artemether injection showed the highest cost ratio and cost variation (cost ratio = 16.96 and % cost variation = 1596). Overall injectable antimalarials showed considerable cost variation as compared to oral antimalarial agents. Chloroquine which is one of the most used antimalarial showed very low values for cost variation and cost ratio.

Conclusions: The analysis showed that there is not much significant price variation among oral antimalarial drugs. The maximum variation shown by oral antimalarial was found to be for fixed dose combination of Artemether and Lumefantrine [cost ratio>2 (2.03) and % price variation >100 (103.7)]. But there was significant price variation among injectable antimalarial. Injectable antimalarials are often the choice of drug when dealing with critically ill malaria patients specially when suffering from complicated malaria. So, such significant price variation creates burden on poor patients economically which leads to non-compliance and hence increased morbidity and mortality due to incomplete treatment.


Keywords


Antimalarial drugs, Compliance, Cost ratio, Percent cost variation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Richard Tren. Malaria and Climate Change. Working Papers Series: Julian Simon Centre For Policy Research. October 2002. Available at http://www.libertyindia.org/pdfs/ malaria_climatechange2002.pdf.

PB Health. National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme. Available at http://pbhealth.gov.in/pdf/malaria.pdf.

Dash AP, Valecha N, Anvikar AR, Umar A. Malaria in India: challenges and opportunities. J Biosci. 2008;33:583-92.

Sharma VP. Re-emergence of malaria in India. Indian J Med Res. 1996;103:26-45.

WHO. World Malaria Report 2014. WHO, Geneva. 2014. Available at http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/144852/2/9789241564830_eng.pdf.

Kumar A, Valecha N, Jain T, Dash AP. Burden of malaria in India: retrospective and prospective view. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;77(6):69-78.

Malaria situation. National Vector Borne Disease control Programme. Available at http://nvbdcp.gov.in/Doc/mal_situation_Jan2015.pdf.

Eaddy MT, Cook CL, O’Day K, Burch SP, Cantrell CR. How patient cost-sharing trends affect adherence and outcomes: a literature review. PT. 2012;37:45-55.

Ahuja J, Gupta M, Gupta AK, Kohli K. Pharmacoeconomics. Natl Med J India. 2004;17:80- 3.

Sanchez LS. Pharmacoeconomics: Principles, methods and applications. In: Dipiro JT, Talbert RL, Yee GC, Matzke GR, Wells BG, Posey ML, Eds. Pharmacotherapy: A pathophysiological approach. 7th Ed. McGraw Hill; New York; 2008:1-2.

Das SC, Mandal M, Mandal SC. A critical study on availability and price variation between different brands: impact on access to medicines. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2007;69(1):160-3.

Chawan VS, Gawand KV, Badwane SV. Cost analysis of oral hypolipidemic agents available in India. Int J Basic Pharmacol. 2014:3:954-7.

Thomas M. Rational drug use and essential drug concept. In: Parthasarthi G, Nyfort Hasen K, Editors. A Textbook of Clinical Pharmacy Practice. 1st Ed. Himayatnagar, Hyderabad: Orient Longman; 2004:72 3.

Creese A, Kotwani A, Kutzin J, Pillay A. Evauating pharmaceuticals for health policy in low and middle-income country settings. In: Freemantle N, Hill S, eds. Evaluating pharmaceuticals for health policy and reimbursement. Massachusetts, USA: Blackwell Publication; (in collaboration with WHO Geneva); 2004:227-243.

Mahal A, Karan A, Engelgau M. The Economic Implications of Non-Communicable Disease for India. Washington, DC: World Bank.2010. Available at http://siteresources.worldbank.org/HEALTHNUTRITIONANDPOPULATION/Resources/281627-1095698140167/EconomicImplicationsofNCDforIndia.pdf.

Rataboli PV, Garg A. Confusing brand names: nightmare of medical profession. J Postgrad Med. 2005;51:13-6.

Drug Cost Control Order, 2013, Government of India. Available at http://www.nppaindia.nic.in/DPCO2013. pdf.