DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20173971

A randomized, controlled study to compare the effects of intravenous labetalol and esmolol on haemodynamic changes during laryngoscopy and intubation

Atit Kumar, Prashant Kumar Mishra, Saurabh Shukla

Abstract


Background: Direct laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation frequently induce cardiovascular stress response characterised by hypertension and tachycardia due to reflex sympathetic stimulation. Considering the clinical significance of these changes stress attenuation is needed to blunt these responses. β- blockers are used to reduce the unwanted hemodynamic responses. Esmolol is ultra-short acting cardio selective β blocker. Labetalol is useful in not only attenuating the response to laryngoscopy and intubation but also in preventing perioperative cardiovascular events. Present study compared the efficacy of esmolol and labetalol for attenuation of sympathomimetic response to laryngoscopy and intubation.

Methods: It was a prospective, randomized, controlled study carried out in 75 adult patients with ASA 1 and ASA 2 posted for elective surgeries. Patients were allocated randomly into Group-1 (esmolol) and Group-2 (labetalol) and Group-3 (placebo) of 25 patients each. Inj. esmolol (1mg/kg) or Inj. labetalol (0.4 mg/kg) or placebo (0.9NS) dissolved up to 5 ml in distilled water was injected intravenously 5 minutes prior to intubation. All patients premeditated with Inj. glycopyrrolate (4µg/kg). Patient were then induced with Inj. propofol (2mg/kg), Inj. scoline (2mg/kg) given followed by laryngoscopy and intubation. Haemodynamic readings were noted at T0 (baseline before injecting the drug), T1 (1 minute after injecting the drug), T2 (after intubation), T3 (2 minutes after intubation), T4 (4 minutes after intubation), T5 (6 minutes after intubation), T6 (8 minutes after injection), T7 (10 minutes after injection).

Results: Gr-1, Gr-2 and Gr-3, when compared with each other for systolic BP, diastolic BP, mean BP, and HR, showed a statistically significant difference at different intervals.

Conclusions: Both the drugs are found to be effective in attenuation of hemodynamic reflex without any side effects. Further studies are recommended to substantiate the findings in present study.


Keywords


Esmolol, Haemodynamic changes, Intubation, Laryngoscopy, Labetalol

Full Text:

PDF

References


Singh SP, Quadir A, Malhotra P. Comparison of esmolol and labetalol, in low doses, for attenuation of sympathomimetic response to laryngoscopy and intubation. Saudi J Anaesth. 2010;4:163-8.

Stoelting RK. Circulatory changes during laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: influence of duration of laryngoscopy with or without lidocaine. Anaesthesiol. 1977;47:381-4.

Fox EJ, Sklar GS, Hill CH, Villanueva R, King BD. Complications related to pressor response to endotracheal intubation. Anaesthesiol. 1977;47:524-5.

Helfmann SM, Gold MI, Delisser EA, Herrington CA. Which drug prevents tachycardia and hypertension associated with tracheal intubation lignocaine, fentanyl or esmolol. Anaesth Analg. 1991;72:482-6.

Sharma J, Sharma V, Gupta S. Comparative study of magnesium sulphate and esmolol in attenuating the pressor response to endotracheal intubation in controlled hypertensive patients. J Anaesth Clin Pharmacol. 2006;22(3):255-9.

Mikawa K, Nishina K, Maekawa N, Obara H. Comparison of nicardipine, diltiazem and verapamil for controlling cardiovascular responses to tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth. 1996;76:221-6.

Kindler CH, Schumacher PG, Schneider MC, Urwyler A. Effects of intravenous lidocaine and/or esmolol on hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation: a double-blind, controlled clinical trial. J Clin Anesth. 1996;8:491-6.

Saitoh N, Mikawa K, Kitamura S, Maekawa N, Goto R, Yaku H, et al. Effects of trimetaphan on the cardiovascular response to tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth. 1991;66:340-4.

Wolman RL, Fiedler MA. Esmolol and beta-adrenergic blockade. AANA J. 1991;59:541-8.

Barbier GH, Shettigar UR, Appunn DO. Clinical rationale for the use of an ultra-short acting beta blocker: esmolol. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1995;33:212-8.

Kim HY, Chung CW, Lee HY, Yim CH. The effect of labetalol on the hemodynamic response to endotracheal intubation. Korean J Anesthesiol. 1994;27:1611-9.

Chung KS, Sinatra RS, Chung JH. The effect of an intermediate dose of labetalol on heart rate and blood pressure response to laryngoscopy and intubation. J Clin Anesth. 1992;4:11-5.

Inada E, Cullen DJ, Nemeskal R, Teplick R. Effect of labetalol on the hemodynamic response to intubation: a controlled, randomized double-blind study. J Clin Anesth. 1989;1:207-13.

Ramanathan J, Sibai BM, Madie WC, Chauhan D, Ruiz AG. The use of labetalol for attenuation of hypertensive response to endotracheal intubation in preeclampsia. AM J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;159:650-4.

Kovac AL, Goto H, Arakawa K, Pardo MP. Esmolol bolus and infusion attenuates increases in blood pressure and heart rate during electroconvulsive therapy. Can J Anaesth. 1990;37(1):58-62.

Prys- Roberts C, Greene LT, Meloche R, Foex P. Studies of anaesthesia in relation to hypertension II. Haemodynamic consequences of induction and endotracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth. 1998;80:106-22.

Mikawa K, Ikegaki J, Maekawa N, Goto R, Kaetsu H, Obara H. The effects of diltiazem on the cardiovascular response to tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia. 1990;45:289-93.

Singh SP, Gogia S, Kumar T. Evaluation of esmolol and labetalol for attenuation of pressor response to laryngoscoy and intubation. Anesthesiol. 2008;109A892.

O’Connor B, Luntley JB. Acute dissection of thoracic aorta. Esmolol is safer than and as effective as labetalol. BMJ. 1995;310(6983):875.

Muzzi DA, Black S, Losasso TJ, Cucchiara RF. Labetalol and esmolol in the control of hypertension after intracranial surgery. Anesth Analg. 1990;70(1):68-71.

Yun JW, Han JS, Lee SY, Hur CR, Lee YJ, Lee YS. The effects of esmolol or Labetalol on hemodynamic and catecholamine level in endotracheal intubation. Korean J Anesthesiol. 1998;34(1):77-85.