DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20173980

Umbilical artery doppler and biophysical profile score: a study of their efficacy in pregnancy induced hypertension and intrauterine growth retardation

Shuchita Sharma Meherishi, Suchika Mangal

Abstract


Background: Accurate diagnostic tests to identify fetuses at risk for in-utero death or injury have long been an important goal for obstetricians and perinatologists. Umbilical Artery Doppler and biophysical profile score are two tests available for antepartum fetal surveillance.

Methods: The study consisted of 100 patients with either presence of PIH (30) or IUGR (28) or both (42). Testing was begun was at 33 weeks. UAD was performed; S/D, RI and PI indices were calculated. Fetal BPS was determined.

Results: Fetal weight was estimated to be less than 2kg in last scan was 23.52% cases in pih/ iugr group versus 6.4% in controls whereas incidence of oligohydramnios was 29.5% versus 91.17% respectively, and number of babies admitted to NICU was 11.47% versus 70.58% respectively

Conclusions: Doppler and biophysical studies can greatly help in arriving at an appropriate strategy for management.


Keywords


Biophysical profile, Doppler, Umbilical artery

Full Text:

PDF

References


mortality (country, regional and global estimates). World Health Organization; 2006.

Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, John SB, Hauth C, Gilstrap III, Wenstrom KD, et al. Obstetrics. 22nd edition, McGraw-Hill Companies, New York; 2005:373-87.

Merz E. Ultrasound in obstetrics and gynaecology. 2nd edition, Mainz, Georg Thieme, New York; 2005:507-13.

Neilson JP, Alfrevic Z. Doppler ultrasound for fetal assessment in high-risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews. 1999;2:CD000073.

Franko KL, Gluckman PD, Law CM, Beedle AS, Morton, SM. Low birth weight and optimal foetal development: a global perspective. Small for Gestational Age, volume 13. Karger Publishers. 2009:73-85.

Murki S, Sharma D. Intrauterine growth retardation: a review article. J Neonatal Biol. 2014;3:3.

Mirza FG, Strohsnitter WC, Rivera J, Gyamfibannerman C. Intrauterine growth restriction with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler: a harbinger for pre-eclampsia? J Maternal Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(12):2658-61.

Torres PJ, Eduard G, Pedro LA. Umbilical artery Doppler ultrasound predicts low birth weight and fetal death in hypertensive pregnancies. 1995;74(5):352-5.

Tyrell SN, Lilford J, MacDonal HN. Randomised comparison of routine versus highly selective use of Doppler ultrasound and biophysical scoring to investigate high risk pregnancies. British J Obstetrics Gynaecol. 1990;97:909-16.

Nisa MU, Hamid N, Farhad N, Farhat K. Correlation of biophysical profile with APGAR score. J Med Sci. 2014;22(4):197-200.

Odd HR, Jensen MS. Guimaraes. Prediction of fetal outcome by Doppler examination and non-stress test. Acta Obs Gynec Scandinavia. 1991;70(4):271-4.

Soregaroli M, Bonera R, Danti L, Dinolfo D, Taddei F, Valcamonico A. Prognostic role of umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry in growth-restricted fetuses. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2002;11(3):199-203.

Romero Arauz JF, Ramos Leon JC, Rivera Velasquez P, Alvarez Jimenzez G, Molina Perez CJ. Umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry and adverse perinatal outcome in severe pre-eclampsia. Ginecol Obstet Max. 2008;76(8):440-9.

Turan S, Turan OM, Berg C, Moyano D, Bhide A, Bower S, et al. Computerized fetal heart rate analysis, Doppler ultrasound and biophysical profile score in the prediction of acid base status of growth-restricted fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30:750-6.

Deka D. Comparison of Umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry with biophysical profile in monitoring high risk pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42:117-29.

Wang KG, Chen CY, Chen YY. The effects of absent or reversed end-diastolic umbilical artery Doppler flow velocity. Taiwanese J Obstetrics Gynecol. 2009;48:225-31.