DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20173660

Morphometric study of depth of acetabulum

Leena Khobragade, P. Vatsalaswamy

Abstract


Background: Anatomy of the hip must be taken into account to study the anatomy of various surgical approaches. Reconstruction of the acetabulum in patients with significant acetabular bone deficiency remains a major challenge in revision total hip arthroplasty. Appropriate anatomic concepts for surgery to treat femoroacetabular impingement require a precise appreciation of the native acetabular anatomy. Since the acetabulum is not always of same shape, width or depth, joint congruences are frequent with minor anatomical variations in the shape of the acetabulum. Hence the present study was undertaken as controversies still exist on the importance of these variations and to prevent problems following surgical procedures such as acetabular reconstruction and femoroacetabular impingement.

Methods: Material of the study consisted of 110 human hip bones (60 males and 50 females). Depth of Acetabulum (DA) was measured on these hip bones on both the sides. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) version 11 and Microsoft Excel 2007.

Results: The mean depth of acetabulum in male was 26.89 mm and female was 25.31 mm. The mean depth of acetabulum on right side was 26.24 mm and left side was 26.11 mm. Depth of the acetabulum was greater in males as compared to females and the differences were statistically significant. Depth was greater on the right side as compared to the left side but the difference was statistically non-significant.

Conclusions: Depth of the acetabulum was greater in males as compared to females.


Keywords


Acetabulum, Depth, Hip arthroplasty, Reconstruction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Tortora GJ, Reynolds S, Grabowski. The skeletal system: The Appendicular skeleton. Principles of Anatomy and Physiology, Ed 10, Bonnie Rosech. John Wiley and Sons,Inc. Hoboken, NJ; 2003:228-231.

Last RJ. Lower limb. Last’s Anatomy Regional and Applied, Ed 9, RMH McMinn. Churchill Livingstone. New York; 1996:215-216.

Standring S. Pelvic girdle, gluteal region and hip joint. Grays Anatomy: The anatomical basis of clinical practice, Ed 39, Andrew Williams. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone. New York; 2005:1421-1440.

Solomon L, Warwick DJ. The Hip. Apley’s System of Orthopaedics and Fractures, Ed 8, Edward Arnold. Oxford University Press. New York; 2001:405,416,446.

Murtha PE, Hafez MA, Jaramaz B., DiGiogia AM. Variations in acetabular anatomy with reference to total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg. 2008;90-B:308-13.

Msamati BC, Igbigbi PS, Lavy CBD. Geometric measurements of the acetabulum in adult Malawians. East African Med J. 2003;80(10):546-9.

Yoshimura N, Campbell L, Hashimoto T, Kinoshita H, Okayasu T, Wilman C. Acetabular dysplasia and hip osteoarthritis in Britain and Japan. Br J Rheumatol. 1998;37:1193-7.

Stoller DW. The Hip. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Orthopaedics And Sports Medicine, Ed 3, Lisa McAllister. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. Philadelphia; 2007:83,91,93.

Mukhopadhaya B, Barooah B. Osteoarthritis of hip in Indians. An anatomical and clinical study. Ind J Orthop. 1967;1:55-62.

Skirving AP, Scadden WJ. The African neonatal hip and its immunity from congenital dislocation. J Bone Joint Surg. 1979;61-B:339-41.

Mandal S, Bhan S. The Centre-Edge angle of Wiberg in the adult Indian population. J Bone Joint Surg. 1996;78-B:320-1.

Chauhan R, Paul S, Dhaon BK. Primary osteoarthritis of hip joint in Indians A cadaveric study. Indian J Orthop. 2002;36(2):7.

Mahajan BK. Significance of difference in means. Methods in Biostatistics. Ed 6, Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. New Delhi; 1997:142.

Salamon A, Salamon T, Sef D, Jo-Osvatic A. Morphological characteristics of the acetabulum. Coll Antropol. 2004;28 Suppl2:221-6.

Saikia KC, Bhuyan SK, Rongphar R. Anthropometric study of the hip joint in Northeastern region population with computed tomography scan. Indian J Orthop. 2008;42:260-6.

Lang C. Osteometric differentiation of male and female hip bones: An exploratory analysis of some unorthodox measurements. Canad Rev Phys Anthropol. 1987;6(1):1-9.

Kim YH. Relationship between the sphericity of femoral head-acetabulum and the low incidence of primary osteoarthritis of the hip joint in Koreans. Yonsei Med J. 1989;30(3):280-7.

Arsuaga JL, Carretero JM. Multivariate analysis of the sexual dimorphism of the hip bone in a modern human population and in early hominids. Am J Physical Anthropol. 1994;93:241-57.

Chauhan R, Paul S, Dhaon BK. Anatomical Parameters of North Indian Hip Joints- Cadaveric Study. J Anat Soc India. 2002;51(1):39-42.

Papaloucas C, Fiska A, Demetriou T. Sexual dimorphism of the hip joint in Greeks. Forensic Sci Int. 2008;179(1):83.

Chibber SR, Singh IB. Asymmetry in muscle weight and one-sided dominance in the human lower limbs. J Anat. 1970;106(3):553-6.