DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20174917

Assessment of sigma metrics results of serum glucose and lipid profile tested by automated chemistry analyzer in medical city hospitals in Iraq

Ahmed Naseer Kaftan, Anne Khazal Yaseen, Zina Hasan

Abstract


Background: A major target of quality assurance is the minimization of error rates in order to enhance patient safety, six sigma or sigma metrics were used to assess the analytical quality of automated clinical chemistry, six sigma metrics is used in combination with total allowable error, method imprecision and bias. The goal is to attain the highest possible sigma scale within the acceptable limits of total allowable error. For assessment of sigma metrics results of serum glucose and lipid profile and verification of reference values for these analytes tested by automated chemistry analyzer in Medical City hospitals.

Methods: In the present study, internal quality control (EQA) and external quality assessment (EQA) data were analyzed for the period from May to July 2017 using chemistry autoanalyzer (Siemens Dimension RxL Max) at the Teaching Laboratories of the Medical City. Mean, standard deviation, coefficient of variation, bias, total error and sigma metrics were calculated for glucose, cholesterol, triglycerides and HDL.

Results: Excellent sigma values (≥6) were elicited for triglycerides (10.9), Satisfactory sigma values (≥3) were elicited for cholesterol (3.4) and HDL (3.4), while glucose performed poorly (2.3) on the sigma scale.

Conclusions: Sigma metrics helps to assess analytical methodologies and augment laboratory performance. It acts as a guide for planning quality control strategy. It can be a self-assessment tool regarding the functioning of clinical laboratory. Triglycerides was the best performer when it was gauzed on the sigma scale, with a sigma metrics value of 10.9 and glucose had the least sigma metrics value of 2.5 so there is need for improvement and the method should be controlled with greater attention to ensure quality.

 


Keywords


Chemistry analyzer, Sigma metrics

Full Text:

PDF

References


McPherson RA. Henry’s Clinical Diagnosis and Management by laboratory methods. 2017. 23e. Chapter 10.

Glossary of Terms for Quality Assurance and Good Laboratory Practices. United Nations Publication; 2009.

Barr JT. The total testing process and its implications for laboratory administration and education. Clin Lab Manage Rev. 1994;8:526-42.

Adiga US. Sigma metrics in clinical chemistry laboratory-A guide to quality control, Al Ameen J Med Sci. 2015;8:281-7.

Burtis CA. Tietz textbook of clinical chemistry and molecular diagnostics. 2012. Chapter 8.

Vivekananthamoorthy N. Lean Six Sigma, Six Sigma Projects and Personal Experiences. chapter 1, 2011.

Nevalainen D. Evaluating laboratory performance on quality indicators with the six sigma scale, Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000;124:516-9.

Sigma metric laboratory. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=sigma+metric+laboaratory. accessed June 2017.

Westgard S. Six Sigma Metric Analysis for Analytical Testing Processes. Abbott MS; 2009.

International Organization for Standardization Medical laboratories -particular requirements for quality and competence. ISO 15189. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva; 2012.

Tetrault G. Evaluating laboratory performance with the six sigma scale. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000;124:1748-9.

Westgard JO. The quality of laboratory testing today an assessment of σ metrics for analytic quality using performance data from proficiency testing surveys and the CLIA Criteria for Acceptable Performance J Clin Pathol. 2006;125:343-54.

Hedwig CM. Measurements for 8 Common Analytes in Native Sera Identify Inadequate Standardization among 6 Routine Laboratory Assays. Clin Chem, 2014;60:855-63.

Westgard JO. Six sigma quality design and control, 2nd ed. Westgard QC Inc; 2006.

Westgard JO. Internal quality control: planning and implementation strategies,Ann Clin Biochem. 2003;40:593-611.

Westgard JO. Performance characteristics of rules for internal quality control: probabilities for false rejection and error detection, Clin Chem. 1977;23: 1857-67.

Westgard S. Improve Lab Operations with Six Sigma Metrics. American society for clinical pathology, annual meeting; 2011.