DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20174954

A study on morphometry of coracoid process of scapula in north Indian population

Usha Verma, Ritu Singroha, Preeti Malik, Suresh Kanta Rathee

Abstract


Background: Coracoid process is a part of scapula and plays an important role in shoulder function. It arises from the antero-lateral aspect of the scapula. The aim of our study is to record the various morphometric parameters of the coracoid process.

Methods: The study was performed on 50 pairs of human scapula of known sex in Department of Anatomy at PGIMS Rohtak. The parameters recorded were length, breadth, thickness, height and types of coraco-glenoid space by using vernier calipers. These parameters were compared in both sexes on both the sides.

Results: Type I (round bracket) coraco-glenoid space was found to be predominant. Statistically significant difference was noted in all four parameters between males and females except in thickness on right side. Though all the four parameters have higher values on right side in comparison to left side but the difference was statistically insignificant.

Conclusions: The study provides valuable information regarding the role of these parameters in etiology of subcoracoid impingement syndrome which will be helpful in its management to the surgeons.


Keywords


Coracoid, Coraco-glenoid, Subcoracoid impingement syndrome

Full Text:

PDF

References


Polguj M, Jedrzejewski KS, Podgorski M, Topol M. Correlation between morphology of the suprascapular notch and anthropometric measurement of the scapula. Folia Morphol. 2011; 70(2):109-15.

Standring S. Gray’s Anatomy: The Anatomical basis of clinical practice. Fortieth edition. London: Elsevier ltd; 2008. p. 777-790.

Rajan S, Ritika S, Kumar SR, Tripta S. Role of coracoid morphometry in subcoracoid impingement syndrome. The Internet J Orthopedic Surg. 2014;22(1):1-7.

Bhatia DN, de Beer JF, du Toit DF. Coracoid process anatomy: implications in radiographic imaging and surgery. Clin Anat. 2007;20(7):774-84.

Von Schroeder HP, Kuiper SD, Botte MJ. Osseous Anatomy of the Scapula. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;383:131-9.

Gallino M, Santamaria E, Doro T. Anthropometry of the scapula: Clinical and surgical consideration. J Should Elb Surg. 1998;7(3):284-91.

Matsen FA, Thomas SC, Rockwood CA. Anterior glenohumeral instability. In: The shoulder. Rockwood CA, Matsen FA, editors. Philadelphia. WB Saunders; 1990. p. 336-67.

Edelson JG, Taitz C. Anatomy of the coracoacromial arch. Relation to degeneration of the acromion. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74:589-94.

Gumina S, Postacchini F, Orsina L. The morphometry of the coracoid process- it’s etiologic role in subcoracoid impingment syndrome. Int Orthop. 1999;23(4):198-201.

Piyawinijwong S, Sirisathira N, Chuncharunee A. The Scapula: Osseous Dimensions and Gender Dimorphism in Thais. Siriraj Hosp Gaz. 2004; 56(7):356-65.

Coskun N, Karaali K, Cevikol C, Demirel BN, Sindel M. Anatomical basics and variations of the scapula in Turkish adults. Saudi Med J. 2006;27(9): 1320-5.

Pahuja K, Singh J. Morphology of coracoid process and glenoid cavity in adult human scapulae. Int J Analytical Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sci. 2014;2(2):19-22.