DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20163336

A randomised clinical study to compare the haemodynamic effects of etomidate with propofol during induction of general anaesthesia

Arvind Khare, Beena Thada, Mukesh Kumar Samota, Veena Mathur, Maina Singh

Abstract


Background: Induction agents are frequently associated with changes in heart rate and blood pressure and various adverse effects. Since the introduction of general anaesthesia, no ideal induction agent has yet been discovered in term of providing a stable hemodynamic with fewer adverse effects. This prospective randomized clinical study was conducted to compare propofol and etomidate for their effect on hemodynamic and various adverse effects on patients scheduled for elective surgeries during the induction of general anesthesia.

Methods: 50 patients of ASA I and II of age group 18-60 years scheduled for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia were randomly assigned in two groups (n=25) receiving etomidate (0.3 mg/kg) in group E and propofol (2.5 mg/kg) in group P as an induction agent. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded at various time intervals. Any adverse effect pain on injection and myoclonus was carefully watched. VAS score was recorded for pain on injection. Statistical analysis was done using software (SPSS IBM version 20). P value was considered significant if (p<0.05).

Results: Demographic variables were comparable in both the groups. Hemodynamic parameters at baseline were comparable. There were no statistically significant differences among groups E and P in terms of heart rate (HR) (P>0.05). Patients in propofol group showed significant fall of  systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and compared to etomidate (P<0.05).) Pain on injection was more in propofol group (P=0.021), While incidence of myoclonus activity was higher in etomidate group (P=0.0027).

Conclusions: Etomidate is a better induction agent over propofol as it provides more hemodynamic stability and less pain on injection as compared to propofol.


Keywords


Etomidate, Propofol, Induction agent, Hemodynamic changes

Full Text:

PDF

References


Reves JG, Glass PS, Lubarsky DA, McEvoy MD, Ruiz RM. Intravenous anaesthetics. In: Miller RD, editor. Miller's Anaesthesia. 7th ed. USA: Churchill Livingstone. 2010;719-71.

Hiller SC, Mazurek MS. Monitored anesthesia care. In: Barash PG, Cullen BF, Stoelting RK, editors. Clinical Anesthesia. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. 2006:1246-61.

Ed's Morgan GE, Mikhail MS, Murray MJ. In Clinical Anesthesiology 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. 2006;200-2.

Dahan A, Nieuwenhuijs DJ, Olofsen E. Influence of propofol on the control of breathing. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2003;23:81-92.

Ebert TJ, Muzi M, Berens R, Goff D, Kampine JP. Sympathetic responses to induction of anesthesia in humans with propofol or etomidate. Anesthesiology. 1992;76(5):725-33.

Doenicke AW, Roizen MF, Hoernecke R, Lorenz W, Ostwald P. Solvent for etomidate may cause pain and adverse effects. Br J Anaesthesia. 1999;83(3):464-6.

Lundy JB, Slane ML, Frizzi JD. Acute adrenal insufficiency after a single dose of etomidate. J Intensive Care Med. 2007;22:111-7.

Masoudifar M, Beheshtian E. Comparison of cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation after induction of anesthesia by Propofol and Etomidate. J Res Med Sci. 2013;18(10):870-4.

Song JC, Lu ZJ, Jiao YF, Yang B, Gao H, Zhang J, et al. Etomidate Anesthesia during ERCP Caused More Stable Hemodynamic Responses Compared with Propofol: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Int J Med Sci. 2015;12(7):559-65.

Möller Petrun A, Kamenik M. Bispectral index-guided induction of general anaesthesia in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery using propofol or etomidate: a double-blind, randomized, clinical trial. Br J Anaesth. 2013;110(3):388-96.

Aono H, Hirakawa M, Unruh GK, Kindscher JD, Goto H. Anesthetic induction agents, sympathetic nerve activity and baroreflex sensitivity: a study in rabbits comparing thiopental, propofol and etomidate. Acta Med Okayama. 2001;55:197-203.

Ray DC, McKeown DW. Etomidate for critically ill patients. Pro:yes we can use it. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012;29:506-10.

Doenicke AW, Roizen MF, Kugler J, Kroll H, Foss J, Ostwald P. Reducing myoclonus after etomidate. Anesthesiology. 1999;90(1):113-9.

Kelsaka E, Karakaya D, Sarihasan B, Baris S. Remifentanil pre-treatment reduces myoclonus after etomidate. J Clin Anesth. 2006;18(2):83-6.

Mayer M, Doenicke A, Nebauer AE, Hepting L. Propofol and etomidate-Lipuro for induction of general anesthesia. Hemodynamics, vascular compatibility, subjective findings and postoperative nausea. Anaesthesist. 1996;45(11):1082-4.