Prescribing patterns in systemic hypertension and pharmaco-economics (cost effectiveness and cost minimisation analyses) of the commonly prescribed antihypertensives in a district hospital in Enugu State, Southeast Nigeria

Authors

  • Emmanuel I. Umegbolu District Hospital Awgu, Enugu State, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20175706

Keywords:

Antihypertensives, Cost, Effectiveness, Hypertension, Minimisation, Pharmacoeconomics

Abstract

Background: Prescribing patterns in systemic hypertension vary from place to place. Studies have shown that cost could be one of the factors responsible for non-adherence to treatment among hypertensive patients. Nigerian pharmacoeconomics studies have not provided a general guide on cost-effective prescribing for hypertensive patients in the country. The aim of the study was to examine the prescribing patterns, do cost effectiveness and cost minimisation analyses of the commonly prescribed antihypertensives, and determine if cost is a major reason many of the hypertensive patients of the District Hospital are usually lost to follow up.

Methods: 5267 adult (≥18 years) non-antenatal patients’ cards of 2016 were reviewed for hypertension. Examination of the prescriptions, cost-effectiveness and cost-minimisation analyses of the commonly prescribed antihypertensives were done.

Results: 12.6% of the patients were hypertensive. 73% of these hypertensive patients were treated pharmacologically. 40.8% adhered to treatment. 73% of the adherent ones responded to treatment. Amlodipine was the most expensive prescribed antihypertensive (N22). Amiloride-hydrochlorothiazide with the largest cost effectiveness ratio (CER) (9) was the most cost effective of all the combinations. Lisinopril- hydrochlorothiazide (N17) was preferable to the triple combination of lisinopril-amlodipine-hydrochlorothiazide (N39), and amlodipine-hydrochlorothiazide (N32) in cost minimisation.

Conclusions: Cost of drugs probably had played a significant role in non-adherence to treatment among hypertensive patients in the District Hospital in 2016, since moduretic with the largest CER (9) and nifedipine with the greatest BP reduction when combined with hydrochlorothiazide (56/22 mm Hg) were rarely prescribed. 

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Gupta R, Gupta VP. Hypertension epidemiology in India: lessons from Jaipur Heart Watch. Curr Sci. 2009;97:349-55.

Ekwunife OI, Udeogaranya PO, Adibe MO. Predictors of self- reported adherence to anti-hypertensive medications in a Nigerian population. J Basic Clin Pharm. 2010;1(2):456-65.

Shittu RO, Musa SA, Louis OO, Sule AG, Aremu IB, Isiaka-Lawal S, et al. Adherence to anti-hypertensive medications and associated factors among patients in a Nigerian family practice setting. Int J Med Res Pharm Sci. 2015;2(5):1-12.

Cardinal H, Monfared AA, Dovais M, Lehovier JA. Comparison between persistence to therapy in Allhat and in everyday clinical practice: a generalisability issue. Can J Cardiol. 2004;20:417-21.

Chapman RH, Benner JS, Petrilla AA. Predictors of adherence to antihypertensive and lipid-lowering therapy. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1147-52.

Agarwal S, Tang SSK, Rosenberg N. Does synchronising initiation of therapy affect adherence to concomitant use of antihypertensive and lipid-lowering therapy? Am J Ther. 2009;16:119-26.

St. James’s Hospital, Dublin 8. An Introduction to Pharmacoeconomics. Nat Med Info Centre. 2002; 8(5).

Gattami SG, Patil AB, Kushare SS. Pharmaco-economics: a review. As J Pharm Clin Res. 2009;2(3):15-26.

Dickson M, Hurst J, Jacobzone S. Survey of pharmacoeconomic assessment activity in eleven countries, 2003. Available at http:// www.oecd.org. Accessed on 29 September 2017.

Jolicoeur LM, Jones-Grizzle AJ, Boyer JG. Guidelines for performing a pharmacoeconomic analysis. Am J Hosp Pharm 1992;49:1741-7.

Wertheimer AI, Chaney N. Pharmacoeconomics business briefing. Pharmacogenesis. 2003:1-4.

Walley T. Pharmacoeconomics and economic evaluation of drug therapies, 2004. Available at http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu. Accessed on 29 September 2017.

Walley T, Davey P. Pharmacoeconomics: a challenge for clinical pharmacologists. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1995;40:199-202.

Ilesanmi OS, Ige OK, Adebiyi AO. The managed hypertensive: the costs of blood pressure control in a Nigerian town. Pan Afr Med J. 2012;12:96.

Bello SI. Adherence and generic substitution among hypertensive patients in a specialist hospital, Nigeria. Glob J Med Res. 2012;12(2):32-42.

Ukwe CV, Ubaka CM. Antihypertensive drug prescribing in a tertiary hospital in Eastern Nigeria. Trop J Pharm Res. 2012;11(2):297.

Ekwunife OI, Okafor CE, Ezenduka C, Udeogaranya P. Cost-utility analysis of antihypertensive medications in Nigeria: a decision analysis, 2013. Available at http://www.resource-allocation.com/content/11/1/2. Accessed on 29 September 2017

Osibogun A, Okwor TJ. Anti-hypertensive prescription and cost patterns in an outpatient department of a Teaching Hospital in Lagos State Nigeria. Open J Prev Med. 2014;4:156-63.

Bakare OQ, Akinyinka MR, Goodman O, Kuyinu YA, Wright OK, Adeniran A, et al. Antihypertensive use, prescription patterns, and cost of medications in a Teaching Hospital in Lagos, Nigeria. Nig J Clin Pract. 2016;19(5):668-72.

National Population Commission. Report of Nigeria’s National Population Commission on the 2006 Census, 2006. Available at http:// www.jstor.org/stable/25434601. Accessed on 10 October 2014

Adeloye D, Basquill C, Aderemi AV, Thompson JY, Obi FA. An estimate of the prevalence of hypertension in Nigeria: a systemic review and meta-analysis. J Hyp. 2015;32:230-42.

Njoku MGC. Epidemiology of high blood pressure, diabetes and obesity in Enugu rural setting. High Blood Pres Diab Obes. 2012:1-17.

Ilo GUP, Amadi AN. Essential hypertension in adult Nigerians in a primary care clinic: a cross-sectional study of the prevalence and associated family socio-biological factors in Eastern Nigeria. Eur J Prev Med. 2014;2(6):81-9.

Umegbolu EI, Ogamba JO. Primary hypertension in young adults (18-40 years) in Enugu State, Southeast Nigeria: a cross-sectional study. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2016;3:2825-31.

Benoit G, Feber J, Harris KC, Poirier L, Padwal RS. The 2015 Canadian hypertension Education Program recommendations for blood pressure measurement, diagnosis, assessment of risk prevention, and treatment of hypertension. Can J Cardiol. 2015;31:549-68.

United States Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NBHLBI). The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation and treatment of high blood pressure. NIH Report 2003; 03-5233.

Lui PH, Wang JD. Antihypertensive medication prescription patterns and time trends for the newly diagnosed uncomplicated hypertension patients in Taiwan. BMC Health Ser Res. 2008;8:133.

Wilson EA, De-mystifying pharmacoeconomics. Drug Benefit Trends. 1999;11(5):56-8.

Malek M. Current principles and applications of pharmacoeconomics. Pharmacoeconomics 1996;9(S1):1-8.

Meyer RP. Towards a research agenda for pharmaceutical issues. Pharmacoeconomics 1996; 10(S2):130-4.

Thwaites R, Townsend JR. Pharmacoeconomics in the new millennium: a pharmaceutical industry perspective. Pharmacoeconomics. 1998;13(2):175-80.

Giles TD, Materson BJ, Cohn JN, Kostis JB. Definition and classification of hypertension: An update. J Clin Hyp. 2009;11:611-4.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-23

How to Cite

Umegbolu, E. I. (2017). Prescribing patterns in systemic hypertension and pharmaco-economics (cost effectiveness and cost minimisation analyses) of the commonly prescribed antihypertensives in a district hospital in Enugu State, Southeast Nigeria. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 6(1), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20175706

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles