Evaluation of physicians and junior residents’ knowledge and awareness of radiation dose and its risks: a cross-sectional survey in tertiary health centre of central India

Sushil Gour; Rajesh Kumar Maurya; Punya Pratap Singh; Himanshu Sharma; Prashant Maravi

doi:10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20175502

Authors

Sushil Gour Department of Radiotherapy, Bundelkhand Medical College Sagar, Madhya Pradesh, India
Rajesh Kumar Maurya Department of Radiotherapy, Bundelkhand Medical College Sagar, Madhya Pradesh, India
Punya Pratap Singh Department of Radiodiagnosis, Bundelkhand Medical College Sagar, Madhya Pradesh, India
Himanshu Sharma Department of Pharmacology, Bundelkhand Medical College Sagar, Madhya Pradesh, India
Prashant Maravi Department of Radiotherapy, Bundelkhand Medical College Sagar, Madhya Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20175502

Keywords:

Ionizing radiation, Medical education, Radiation dose, Radiological examinations, Radiation injuries, Radiation safety

Abstract

Background: The frequency of radiological investigations increases to many fold now-a-days, so it is necessary to know the knowledge of all physicians about radiation dose, safety measures and regulations which governs the use and practice of radiation examination and their therapeutic use. The objectives comprise to investigate amongst all Physicians: (1) level of knowledge and awareness of radiation dose of radiological investigations and radiobiology of radiation exposure, and (2) to assess physicians’ knowledge about the risks associated with the use of radiological examinations and their safety measures.

Methods: A questionnaire targeting about knowledge, safety measures, and radiation biology about some commonly performed radiological procedures was addressed: (1) Relative radiation doses, (2) Associated risks of radiation exposure, (3) What safety measures should be considered before examination. (4) What risk and hazards all physicians considered when requesting radiological examinations.

Results: A questionnaire answered by physicians demonstrates loops in knowledge. In all, 15% (14/92) incorrectly believed that magnetic resonance imaging involved radiation exposure and 3% (3/92) incorrectly believed that ultrasound involved radiation exposure; 38% (35/92) stated that they always explain the benefits and risk of radiation to their patients when obtaining informed consent for examinations involving radiation.

Conclusions: This study concluded a deficit of knowledge about radiation dose exposure, and hazards among Physicians, which may cause them to request more radiological investigations than appropriate and high-dose investigations instead of lower dose alternatives. Providing better radiation protection training may help improve their basic knowledge on the subject and reduce unnecessary patient exposure to radiation.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

References-

Park K. Park’s textbook of preventive and social medicine. 20th ed. Jabalpur, India: M/s Barnasidas Bhanot; 2009.

Charles M. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. J Radiol Prot. 2001;21:83-85

Adetokunbo OL, Herbert MG. Short textbook of public health medicine in the tropics. 4th ed. London: Arnold; 2003.

Lee CI, Haims AH, Monico EP, Brink JA, Forman HP. Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology. 2004;231:393-8.

Arslanoğlu A, Bilgin S, Kubal Z, Ceyhan MN, Ilhan MN, Maral I. Doctors’ and intern doctors’ knowledge about patients’ ionizing radiation exposure doses during common radiological examinations. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2007;13:53-55.

Jacob K, Vivian G, Steel JR. X-ray dose training: are we exposed to enough? Clin Radiol. 2004;59;928-34; discussion 926-7.

Soye JA, Paterson A. A survey of awareness of radiation dose among health professionals in Northern Ireland. Br J Radiol. 2008;81:725-9.

Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:289-96.

Brenner DJ, Doll R, Goodhead DT, et al. Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:13761-6.

Integrated Environment Management Inc (IEM). The ALARA concept. Available at: http://www.iem-inc.com/information/radioactivity-basics/radiation-risks/the-alara-concept.

International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Recommendations of the ICRP: ICRP Publication 103. Annals of the ICRP 2007; 37

International Commission on Radiological Protection, 2007. Recommendations of the ICRP, Publication 103, Pergamon Press, Oxford (2007).

Council Directive 97/43/EURATOM of 30 June 1997 on health protection of individuals against the dangers of ionizing radiation in relation to medical exposure. Available at http://ec.europa. eu/energy/nuclear/radioprotection/doc/legislation/9743_en.pdf. Accessed Aug 2010.

Lewis C. Full-body CT scans. What you need to know. FDA Consum. 2001;35:10

Earnest F, Swensen SJ, Zink FE. Respecting patient autonomy:

screening at CT and informed consent. Radiology. 2003;226:633-4.

Arslanoğlu A et al. Doctors’ and intern doctors’ knowledge about patients’ ionizing radiation exposure doses during com-mon radiological examinations. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, 2007, 13:53–55

SEER Cancer Statistics Review 1975-2007 (NCI 2010). Cancer Facts & Figures

American Cancer Society; 2010.

Jacob K, Vivian G, Steel JR. X-ray dose training: are we exposed to enough? Clinical Radiology, 2004, 59:928–934.

Soye JA, Paterson A. A survey of awareness of radiation dose among health professionals in Northern Ireland. British Journal of Radiology, 2008, 81:725–729.