DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20180619

Comparison of outcome in lumbar spine instability treated surgically with pedicle screw fixation with or without interbody fusion device (cage)

Sandeep Kumar Mishra, Kushal Haresh Gori, Deepak C. E.

Abstract


Background: Lumbar spinal fusion was introduced approximately 70 years ago and has evolved as a treatment option for symptomatic spinal instability, spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, and degenerative scoliosis. Broader applications including use as a treatment of chronic low back pain and recurrent radiculopathy have resulted in a dramatic increase in the rates of lumbar fusion procedures within the last decade.

Methods: A retrospective and prospective study to be carried out for 40 patients who were assigned in the following groups: Group 1 (n=20) consisted of patients who underwent lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screw and bone graft, and Group 2 (n=20) consisted of patients treated by lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screw and interbody cage.

Results: Most of patients with lumbar spine instability were in 4th and 5th decade of life with average age of 46.75 yrs and female predominance with 26 (65%) cases.65% of Instability was found due to Spondylolisthesis. PLIF with Cage showed better scores than BG in terms of ODI, VAS, SF-36, Benzel’s modified Japanese scores at end of 1 year, which is statistically not significant.

Conclusions: Lumbar spine instability is more common in 4th and 5th decade of life with female predominance, commonest level of instability being L4-L5 and commonest mode was Spondylolisthesis. PLIF with Cage is associated with greater operative time and lesser blood loss. Patients with PLIF + Cage had better neurological improvement, pain reduction, reduced disability, generalised well-being and satisfaction as evident by Modified Benzel’s Japanese scales, VAS, ODI, and SF-36 scores respectively, which is statistically not significant. Addition of an interbody fusion device (Cage) helps in greater stability, lower implant failure, higher fusion rate and better functional outcome in patient treated with PLIF for lumbar spine instability.


Keywords


Cage fusion, Comparision between bony and cage fusion, Interbody fusion, PLIF

Full Text:

PDF

References


White A, Panjabi M. Clinical biomechanics of the spine. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1990.

Sharma M, Langrana NA, Rodriguez J. Role of ligaments and facets in lumbar spinal stability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995;20(8):887-900.

Puttlitz CM, Goel VK, Pope MH. Biomechanical testing sequelae relevant to spinal fusion and instrumentation. Orthop Clin North Am. 1998;29(4):571-89.

Adams M. The biomechanics of back pain. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2002.

Herkowitz HSidhu K. Lumbar Spine Fusion in the Treatment of Degenerative Conditions: Current Indications and Recommendations. J Americ Academ Orthopaedic Surg. 1995;3(3):123-35.

Herkowitz HN, Sidhu KS. Lumbar spine fusion in the treatment of degenerative conditions: current indications and recommendations. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1995;3(3):123-35.

Pradhan B, Bae H, Dawson E, Patel V, Delamarter R. Graft Resorption with the Use of Bone Morphogenetic Protein: Lessons From Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Femoral Ring Allografts and Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2. Spine. 2006;31(10):E277-E284.

Rivet D, Jeck D, Brennan J, Epstein A, Lauryssen C. Clinical outcomes and complications associated with pedicle screw fixation-augmented lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2004;1(3):261-6.

Chitnavis B, Barbagallo G, Selway R, Dardis R, Hussain A, Gullan R. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for revision disc surgery: review of 50 cases in which carbon fiber cages were implanted. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2001;95(2):190-5.

Janssen M, Nguyen C, Beckham R, Larson A. Biological cages. Europ Spine J. 2000;9(S1):S102-9.

Brantigan JW, Steffee AD. A carbon fiber implant to aid interbody lumbar fusion. Two-year clinical results in the first 26 patients.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993;18(14):2106-7.

Yu C, Wang C, Chen P. Instrumented Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Adult Spondylolisthesis. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2008;466(12):3034-43.

Lee D, Jung T, Lee S. Single-level instrumented mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2008;9(2):137-44.

Hosono N, Namekata M, Makino T, Miwa T, Kaito T, Kaneko N, et al. Perioperative complications of primary posterior lumbar interbody fusion for nonisthmic spondylolisthesis: analysis of risk factors. J Neurosurg. Spine. 2008;9(5):403-7.

Pihlajamäki H, Myllynen P, Böstman O. Complications Of Transpedicular Lumbosacral Fixation For Non-traumatic Disorders. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 1997;79(2):183-189.