Comparative study on Haemodynamic response to extubation: Attenuation with Lignocaine, Esmolol, Propofol


  • Nagrale M. H. Department of Anaesthesia, Mamata Medical College, Khammam, Telangana
  • Pradeep S. Indurkar Department of Anaesthesia, Mamata Medical College, Khammam, Telangana
  • Chendra Shekhar Pardhi Department of Anaesthesia, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Sawangi, Wardha, Maharashtra



Lignocaine, Propofol, Esmolol, Extubation, Haemodynamics


Background: Endotracheal extubation is an unpredictable and tricky part of anaesthetic management. Elevation in blood pressure and heart rate due to extubation are brief but may have detrimental effects. Hence there should be an effective means of attenuating sympathetic responses to tracheal extubation. Many strategies have been advocated to minimize these hemodynamic adverse responses. Among the recommended procedures i.v. lignocaine, fentanyl and esmolol appear to fulfil the above mentioned criteria.

Methods: This prospective randomized study was done on 90 patients to evaluate haemodynamic effects of intravenous Propofol, Lignocaine, Esmolol given two minutes prior to extubation.

Results: Heart rate, Systolic, Diastolic and Mean blood pressure decreased significantly to Esmolol 1.5mg/kg and propofol 0.5 mg/kg 2 minutes prior to extubation. With lignocaine there was an initial rise in blood pressure. Lignocaine, Esmolol and Propofol were able to attenuate cough and strain of extubation in > 90% of the patients.

Regarding Esmolol, our study coincided with similar studies done by different authors but we found that esmolol in doses of 1.5mg/kg showed better results to control haemodynamic response during extubation.  Sedation score was a little high in Propofol group. Extubation scoring was good with all the three drugs.

Conclusions: Esmolol IV is preferred for attenuation of haemodynamic responses when compared with IV propofol 0.5 mg/kg and IV lignocaine (2%) 1 mg/kg as the attenuation effect is elicited immediately.



King BD, Harris LC, Grefiesnstein FE, Elder JP. Reflex circulatory responses to direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation performed during general anaesthesia, Anaesthesiology. 1951;12:556-66.

Miller KA, Harkin CP, Bailey PL. Postoperative Tracheal Extubation. Anesth. Analg. 1995;80:14972.

Lowrie A. Johnston PL, Fell D, Robinson SL. Cardiovascular and plasma catecholamine responses at tracheal extubation. Br J Anacsth. 1992;68(3):261-3.

Caplan RA, Posner KL, Ward RJ, Cheney FW. Adverse respiratory 'events in anaesthesia: a closed claims analysis. Anaesthesiology. 1990;72:828-33.

Ruth HS, Haugen FP, Grove DD. Anaesthesia study commission. JAMA. 1947;135:881-4.

Hovi-Viander M. Death associated with anaesthesia in Finland. Br J Anesth. 1980;52:483-9.

Mathew JP, Rosenbaum SH, 0 Connor T, Barash PG. Emergency tracheal intubation in the postanesthesia care unit: physician error or patient disease? Anaesth Analg. 1990;71:691-7.

Demling RH, Read T, Lind LJ, Hanagan HL. Incidence and morbidity of extubation failure in surgical intensive care patients. Crit. Care Med. 1988;16:573-7.

Bidwai AV, Rogers CR, Bidwai VA. Blood pressure and pulse rate responses to extubation with and without Prior injection of Lidocaine. Anaesthesiology. 1979;51:171-73.

Muzzi DA, Black S, Iosasso TJ, Cucchiara RF. Labetalol and esmolol in the control of hypertension after intracranial surgery. Anesth Analg. 1990;70(1):68-71.

Dyson A, Isaac PA, Pennant J, Giesccke AH, Lipton JM. Esmolol attenuates cardiovascular responses to extubation. Anesth Analg. 1990;71.

Fuhrman TM, Ewell CL, Pippin WD, Weaver JM. Comparison of the efficacy of esmolol and alfentanil to attenuate the hemodynamic responses to emergence and extubation. J Clin Anesth. 1992;4(6):444-7.

Nishina K, Mikawa K, Maekawa N, Ohara H. Fentanyl attenuates cardiovascular responses to tracheal extubation Postoperative Tracheal Extubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Fentanyl Postoperative Tracheal Extubation Scand. 1995;39(1):85-9.

Nishina K, Mikawa K, Shiga M, Maekawa N, Obara H. Prostaglandin El attenuates the hypertensive response to tracheal extubation. Can J Anaesth. 1996;43(7):678-83.

Nishina K, Mikawa K, Takao Y, Shiga M, Maekawa N, Obara H. Prostaglandin El, lidocaine, and prostaglandin El -lidocaine combination for attenuating cardiovascular responses to extubation. Can J Anaesth. 1997;44(11):1211-4.

Conti J, Smith D. extubation after cardiac surgery with and without continued sedation. Br J Anaesth. 1998;80(6):834-6.

Fujii Y, Saitoh Y. Takahashi S. Toyooka H. Combined diltiazem and lidocaine reduces cardiovascular responses to tracheal extubation and anaesthesia emergence in hypertensive patients. Can J Anaesth. 1999;46(10):952-6.

Chhabra B, Malhotra N, Bhardwaj M, Goel GK. Hacmodynamic Response to Extubation: Attenuation with Propofol, Lignocaine and Esmolol. J Anaesth Clin-Pharrnacol. 2003;19(3):283-8.

Wang YQ, Guo QL, Xie D. Hunan Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. Effects of different doses of esmolol on cardiovascular responses to tracheal extubation. 2003;28(3):259-62.

Kaur S, Gupta A, Sharma A, Singh M. Role of Propofol in Prevention of ExtubatioriRelated Complications in Oral Surgery in Oral Surgery J Anaesth Clin Phannacol. 2006;22(2):155-60.

Venkatesan T, Korula G. A comparative study between the effects of J% endotracheal tube cuff lignocaine and 1.5 mg/kg intravenous lignocaine on coughing and hemodynamics during extubation in neurosurgical patients: a randomized controlled double-blind trial. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2006;18(4):230-4.

Kovac AL, Masiongale A. Comparison of nicardipine versus esmolol in attenuating the hemodynamic responses to anaesthesia emergence and extubation. Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007;21(1):45-50.




How to Cite

M. H., N., Indurkar, P. S., & Pardhi, C. S. (2016). Comparative study on Haemodynamic response to extubation: Attenuation with Lignocaine, Esmolol, Propofol. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 4(1), 144–151.



Original Research Articles