DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20181788

Migrated intrauterine contraceptive device: erosion in to sigmoid colon

Hitesh Kumar, Prashant Sharma, Beena Aggarwal

Abstract


Intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUCDs) are one of the most widely chosen contraceptive methods with high efficacy, less side effects, and low cost especially in a developing country like India. Although they have low side effect profile but they are also associated with serious complications like device migration into adjacent organs, uterine perforation and sepsis. Any patient presenting with loss of thread should be assessed for localization of the IUCD. Authors are thereby reporting a case of a 30-year-old lady who presented with 2 month amenorrhea with loss of IUCD thread. She was diagnosed with intrauterine pregnancy with migrated IUCD into distal sigmoid colon. The patient was explored, IUCD was removed, dilatation and evacuation were done. Authors concluded that IUCDs are safe only in experienced hands and an institutional training is must for family planning workers. Patient education regarding regular checkup for threads is also emphasized.


Keywords


Intrauterine pregnancy, Migrated IUCD, Sigmoid perforation

Full Text:

PDF

References


United Nations. World Contraceptive Use 2007. New York, NY, USA: United Nations, Population Division, Dept. of Economic and Social Affairs; 2008.

Takahashi H, Puttler KM, Hong C, Ayzengart AL. Sigmoid colon penetration by an intrauterine device: a case report and literature review. Mil Med. 2014 Jan;179(1):e127-9.

Arslan A, Kanat-Pektas M, Yesilyurt H, Bilge U. Colon penetration by a copper intrauterine device: a case report with literature review. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2009;279(3): 395-7.

Zakin D, Stern WZ, Rosenblatt R. Complete and partial uterine perforation and embedding following insertion of intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynaecol Surg. 1981;36:335-53.

Kriplani A, Garg P, Sharma M, Agarwal N. Laparoscopic removal of extrauterine IUCD using fluoroscopy guidance: a case report. Journal of Gynaecologic Surgery. 2005;21(1):29-30.

Key TC, Kreutner AK. Gastrointestinal complications of modern intrauterine contraceptive device. Obstet Gynecol. 1980;55:239-44.

Singh I. Intravesical cu-T emigration: an atypical and infrequent cause of vesical calculus. Int Urol Nephrol. 2007;39(2):457-59.

Carson SA, Gatlin A, Mazur M. Appendiceal perforation by copper-7 intrauterine contraceptive device. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;141(5): 86-87.

Treisser A, Colau JC. Causes, diagnosis and treatment of uterine perforations by intrauterine devices. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 1978;7:837-47.

World Health Organization (WHO) WHO Technical Report. 753. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO. Mechanism of action, safety and efficacy of intrauterine devices; 1987.

Mosley FR, Shahi N, Kurer MA. Elective surgical removal of migrated intrauterine contraceptive devices from within the peritoneal cavity: a comparison between open and laparoscopic removal. Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. 2012;16(2):236-41.