DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20181775

An evaluation of efficacy of Lichtenstein mesh hernioplasty in emergency settings: a study in tertiary care hospital in Odisha

Srikanta Panda, Minati Mohapatra, Sudhir Kumar Panigrahi, Anshuman Sarangi, Somanatha Jena

Abstract


Background: Despite the high incidence, the technical aspects of hernia repair continue to evolve making it the most common operations performed by general surgeons. Lichtenstein mesh hernioplasty repairs all hernias without distortion of the normal anatomy and with no suture line tension. This study was performed to evaluate the outcomes of Lichtenstein mesh herinioplasty in emergency inguinal hernia patients.

Methods: A 84 patients were operated for complicated (obstructed irreducible) inguinal hernia. A follow-up period of 6 months using the Quantitative and Qualitative Measurement Instrument for evaluation of Lichtenstein hernioplasty outcomes was completed for 44 emergency patients.

Results: The age incidence of the hernia patients in the study group was 40% (25-35 years) followed by 24% (15-25 years). The anatomical position of the hernia in the study group was to the right having a dominant percentage of 72% followed by left (24%) with none in bilateral. Early postoperative complications in mesh repair (Lichtenstein hernioplasty) comprising of factors like wound infection (10%), hematoma (5%), seroma (10%) was significantly lower compared to tissue repair with wound infection (20%), hematoma (5%) and seroma (25%). Further mesh rejection in Lichtenstein hernioplasty was 0% for the study population. Similarly, late postoperative complications in Lichtenstein hernioplasty comprising of factors like wound dehiscence (4%), neuralgia (27%) was significantly lower compared to tissue repair with wound dehiscence (27%), neuralgia (41%).

Conclusions: The study revealed that the use of polypropylene prosthesis in the emergency setting (obstructed hernia) is safe and outcomes are satisfactory.


Keywords


Hernia, Lichtenstein mesh herinioplasty

Full Text:

PDF

References


Rutkow IM, Robbins AW. Demographic, classificatory and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in United States. Surg Clin North Am. 1993;73:413.

Maingot’s Abdominal Operations, 12th Edition, McGraw-Hill Education;2013.

Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, Montflor MM. The tension free hernioplasty. Am J Surg. 1989;157:188.

Lichtenstein IL, Shore JM. Simplified repair of femoral and recurrent inguinal hernia by a “plug” technique. Am J Surg. 1974;128:439.

Cumberland VH. A preliminary report on the use of a prefabricated nylon weave in the repair of ventral hernia. Med J Aust.1952;1(5):143-4.

Gilbert AI, Felton LL. Infection in inguinal hernia repair considering biomaterials and antibiotics. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993;177:126.

Bendavid R, Kux M. In: Abdominal Wall Hernias: Principles and Management. Bendavid R, Abrahamson J, Arregui ME, Flament JB, Phillips EH, editor. New York: Springer;2001;753-756.

Tverskoy M, Cozacov C, Ayache M, Bradley JE, Kissin I. Postoperative pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy with different types of anesthesia. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 1990 Jan;70(1):29-35.

McIntosh A, Hutchinson A, Roberts A, Withers H. Evidence-based management of groin hernia in primary care--a systematic review. Fam Pract. 2000 Oct;17(5):442-7.

Schumpelick V, Treutner KH, Arlt G. Inguinal hernia repair in adults. Lancet. 1994;344(8919):375-9.

Gallegos NC, Dawson J, Jarvis M, Hobsley M. Risk of strangulation in groin hernias. Br J Surg. 1991 Oct;78(10):1171-3.