Comparative evaluation of dental computed tomographic software program in the analysis of jaw lesions in comparison with panoramic radiographs


  • Anindita Saha Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Burdwan Dental College & Hospital, Burdwan, West Bengal
  • Asish Kumar Das Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Burdwan Dental College & Hospital, Burdwan, West Bengal
  • Sailendranath Biswas Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Burdwan Dental College & Hospital, Burdwan, West Bengal
  • Vineet Nair Department of Periodontia, Burdwan Dental College & Hospital, Burdwan, West Bengal



Computed tomography, Dentascan, Intraosseous jaw lesions, Orthopantomogram, Radiology


Background: Dental radiology has long played an exciting and critical diagnostic role in dentistry. The development of novel imaging modalities like computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has revolutionized dental and medical diagnosis. However the role of conventional radiography in dentistry remains unparalleled. The current study was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of dental CT software compared to panoramic radiography in evaluation of the jaw lesions.

Methods: Twenty cases of maxillary and mandibular jaw lesions were examined radiographically by digital panoramic radiography orthopantomography (OPG) and dental CT software. The radiographic images obtained with these two examination modalities were compared for visualization of antero-posterior extent of the lesion, dimension of the lesion, cortical bone involvement, tooth displacement, root resorption, involvement of the maxillary sinus, delineation of the neurovascular canal, presence or absence of calcification, imaging diagnosis of the lesion (cystic/solid).

Results: The dental CT program rated significantly (P<0.001) higher in all points examined than the panoramic radiography. The dental CT program was found to be superior for detecting cortical bone involvement (P<0.02) and delineation of the mandibular canal (P<0.02) to the conventional CT program.

Conclusions: Dentascan offers better characterization of the pathologic processes due to its ability to differentiate between different tissue types based on their Hounsfield units. Hence it can define the contents of the pathology as cystic or solid and thus predict the diagnosis of the lesion.


White SC, Pharoah MJ. The Evolution and Application of Dental Maxillofacial Imaging Modalities. Dent Clin N Am. 2008;52:689-05.

Lund TM, Manson-Hing LR. A study of the focal troughs of three panoramic dental x-ray machines. Part I. The area of sharpness. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1975;39(2):318-28.

Ames JR, Johnson RP, Stevens EA. Computerized tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Oral Surg. 1980;38(2):145-9.

Yanagisawa K, Friedman CD. DentaScan imaging of the mandible and maxilla. Head Neck. 1993;15(1):1-7.

King JM, Caldarelli DD, Petasnick JP. DentaScan: a new diagnostic method for evaluating mandibular and maxillary pathology. Laryngoscope. 1992;102(4):379-87.

Au-Yeung KM, Ahuja AT. Dentascan in oral imaging. Clin Radiol. 2001;56(9):700-13.

Abrahams JJ, Oliverio PJ. Odontogenic cysts: improved imaging with a dental CT software program. Am J Neuroradiol. 1993;14(2):367-74.

Lenglinger FX, Krennmair G. Improved imaging of mandibular cysts using dental-CT. Aktuelle Radiol. 1995;5(5):315-8.

Krennmair G, Lenglinger F. Imaging of mandibular cysts with a dental computed tomography software program. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;24:48-52.

Fagelman D, Huang AB. Prospective evaluation of lesions of the mandible and maxilla: findings on multiplanar and three-dimensional CT. Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163(3):693-8.

Hertzanu Y, Mendelsohn DB, Cohen M. Computed tomography of mandibular ameloblastoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1984;8(2):220-3.

Krennmair G, Lenglinger FX. Imaging of unerupted and displaced teeth by cross-sectional CT scans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;24(6):413-6.

Abrahams JJ, Berger SB. Oral-maxillary sinus fistula (oroantral fistula): clinical features and findings on multiplanar CT. Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165(5):1273-6.

Cho BH. Radiographic analysis of odontogenic cysts showing displacement of the mandibular canal. Korean J Oral Maxillofac Radiol. 2003;33(4):211-5.

Stella JP, Tharanon W. A precise radiographic method to determine the location of the inferior alveolar canal in the posterior edentulous mandible: implication for dental implants. Clinical application. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990;5:23-9.

Sonick M, Abrahams JJ, Faiella RA. A Comparison of the Accuracy of Periapical, Panoramic, and Computerized Tomographic Radiographs in Locating the Mandibular Canal. JOMI. 1994;9(4):455-60.

Devlin H, Horner K. The radiological features of calcifying odontogenic cyst. Br J Radiol. 1993;66(785):403-7.

Gang TI, Huh KH. Diagnostic ability of differential diagnosis in ameloblastoma and odontogenic keratocyst by imaging modalities and observers. Korean J Oral Maxillofac Radiol. 2006;36:177-82.

Osborn AG, Hanafee WH, Mancuso AA. Normal and Pathologic CT Anatomy of the Mandible. AJR. 1982;139:555-9.

Brant-Zawadzki MN, Minagi H, Federle MP, Rowe LD. High Resolution CT with Image Reformation in Maxillofacial Pathology. AJR. 1982;138:477-83.




How to Cite

Saha, A., Das, A. K., Biswas, S., & Nair, V. (2016). Comparative evaluation of dental computed tomographic software program in the analysis of jaw lesions in comparison with panoramic radiographs. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 4(1), 303–313.



Original Research Articles