DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20160312

A comparative study of static pulmonary function tests in Indian pregnant and non-pregnant women

Ameet Fadia, Manish Dhadse

Abstract


Background: Pregnancy represents one of the best examples of selective adaptation in terms of respiratory physiology. Objective of the study is to evaluate the changes in static pulmonary function tests (PFTs) in third trimesters of pregnancy (study group) and compare with non-pregnant women (control group).

Methods: 65 subjects (study group 35 subjects and control group 30 subjects) from a tertiary care hospital of Mumbai were included in the study. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) was done by computerized spirometry.

Results: Statistical analysis was carried out and paired t-test was applied. Significant increase in mean inspiratory capacity and significant decrease in mean expiratory reserve volume were observed in the third trimester of normal pregnant women as compared to normal non-pregnant women.

Conclusions: The present study highlights observation that there is no respiratory impairment due to pregnancy, as adaptive changes in respiratory system compensate for the altered structure and function of the maternal body and very well suffice for the increased needs of pregnancy.

 


Keywords


Pulmonary function tests, Pregnancy, Third trimester of pregnancy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Chhabra S, Nangia V, Ingley KN. Changes in respiratory function tests during pregnancy. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol.1988;32:56-60.

Foidart M. Physiology of the pregnant woman and risk factors. Contracept Fertil Sex. 1993;21:811-5.

Elkus R, Popovich J. Respiratory physiology in pregnancy. Clin Chest Med. 1992;13:555-65.

Mokkapati R, Prasad EC, Venkatraman, Fatima K. Ventilatory functions in pregnancy. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 1991;35:237-40.

Landt H, Benjamin JE. Cardiodynamic and electrocardiographic changes in normal Pregnancy. Am Heart J. 1936;12:592-607.

Widlund G. The cardio-pulmonary function during

pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1945;25:1-125.

Alward HC. Observations on the vital capacity during the last month of pregnancy and the puerperium. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1930;20:373-82.

Rubin A, Russo N, Goucher D. The effect of pregnancy upon pulmonary function in normal women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1956;72:963-9.

Cugell DW, Frank NR, Gaensler EA, Badger TL. Pulmonary function in pregnancy. I. Serial observations in normal women. Amer. Rev. Tuberc. 1953;67:568.

Plass ED, Oberst FW. Respiration and pulmonary ventilation in normal nonpregnant, pregnant, and puerperal women, with interpretation of acid base balance during normal pregnancy. Am. J. Obst. and Gynec., 1938;35:441.

Abramson D, Roberts SM, Wilson PD. Relaxation of the pelvic joints in pregnancy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1934;58:595-613.

Thomson KJ, Cohen MK. Studies on the circulation in pregnancy. II Vital capacity observations in normal pregnant women. Surgery, Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 1938;66:591-603.

McGinty AP. Comparative effects of pregnancy and phrenic nerve interruption on the diaphragm and their relation to pulmonary tuberculosis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1938;35:237-48.

Gilroy RJ, Mangura BT, Lavietes MH. Rib cage and abdominal volume displacements during breathing in pregnancy. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1988;137(3):668-72.

Puranik BM, Kaore SB, Kurhade GA, Agrawal SD, Patwardhan SA, Kher JR. A longitudinal study of pulmonary function tests during pregnancy. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 1994;38(2):129-32.