DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20184060

Rocuronium for intubation in parturients undergoing caesarean section

Sajina M., Medha A. Sangawar, Sangawar A. V., Niraj Bannore

Abstract


Background: Anaesthetic management of a parturient is a challenge because it involves simultaneous care of both mother and baby. Succinylcholine, a depolarizing muscle relaxant is most commonly used and considered “The Gold Standard’’ for tracheal intubation. Among currently available non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agent rocuronium bromide is the only agent that has rapid onset of action which is comparable to succinylcholine. Thus, rocuronium may provide alternative to succinylcholine for rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia wherever succinylcholine is contraindicated.

Methods: In a control trial, 60 parturients of ASA grade I and II were randomly allocated in two groups of 30 patients each (group R and group S). After preoxygenation for a period of 5minutes rapid sequence induction done with thiopentone 5mg/kg for all patients. Muscle relaxant rocuronium (0.6mg/kg) was administered for group R. Succinylcholine was given in similar dosage (0.6mg/kg) for group S. The intubation was tried after 90 seconds in group R (rocuronium group) but after 60 seconds in group S (succinylcholie group). The intubating conditions were assessed and compared among the groups using criteria suggested by Cooper et al.

Results: The mean intubation time was 98.3 seconds in group R and 67.9 seconds in group S. Rocuronium produced clinically acceptable intubating conditions in 28 out 30 patients (93.33%). Among these 28 patients 70% had excellent intubating conditions and 23.33% had good intubating conditions. Clinically acceptable intubating conditions were present in all 30 patients (100%-90% excellent and 10% good) who were administered succinylcholine. Succinylcholine produced excellent intubating conditions at 60 seconds (90 percent) compared to rocuronium (70 percent). However, this difference was statistically insignificant (p= 0.053). The mean Apgar score at 1 min and 5 min in group R was 8.1 and 8.83 as against 8.06 and 8.96 in babies born to mother in group S.

Conclusions: Rocuronium (0.6mg/kg) provided acceptable intubation conditions after a waiting period of 90 seconds in 93.33% patients as against 100% patients in succinylcholine administered patients in equivalent dosage. So rocuronium is a promising alternative for rapid sequence induction in parturients in whom succinylcholine is not advisable or contraindicated.


Keywords


Endotracheal intubation, Intubation score, Laryngoscopy, Parturients, Rocuronium, Rapid sequence intubation, Succinylcholine

Full Text:

PDF

References


Munnar U, De Booisblance B, Suresh MS. Airway problems in pregnancy. Crit Care Med. 2005; 33(10):259-68.

Barash P, Cullen BF, Stoelting RK, Cahalan M, Stock MC, Ortega R. Clinical Anesthesia. 7th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;2013.

Hunter JM. Rocuronium: the newest amino steroid neuromuscular blocking drug. Br J Anaesth. 1996;76:481-3.

Sluga M, Ummenhofer W, Studer W, Siegemund M, Marsch SC. Rocuronium versus succinylcholine for rapid sequence induction of anesthesia and endotracheal intubation: a prospective, randomized trial in emergent cases. Anesthesia Analgesia. 2005 Nov 1;101(5):1356-61.

Ali A, Sheikh NA, Khawaja S, Saleem J, Kaul SU. Comparison of Intubating Conditions Produced by Rocuronium and Suxamethonium for Rapid Sequence Induction in Elective Caeserean. Ann King Edward Med Uni. 2008;14(1):5-7.

Cooper R, Mirakhur RK, Clarke RS, Boules Z. Comparison of intubating conditions after administration of Org 9426 (rocuronium) and suxamethonium. Br J Anaesthesia. 1992 Sep 30;69(3):269-73.

Butterworth JF, Mackey DC, Wasnick JD. Neuromuscular Blocking Agents, Morgan and Mikhail’s clinical anaesthesiology, 5th Edition. McGraw Hill, US. 2013.

Stoelting RK, Hiler SC. Neuromuscular blocking drugs. Pharmacology and physiology in anaesthetic practice, 4th Edition. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia. 2006.

Magorian T, Flannery KB, Miller RD. Comparison of rocuronium, succinylcholine, and vecuronium for rapid-sequence induction of anesthesia in adult patients. Anesthesiol. 1993 Nov;79(5):913-8.

Cantineau JP, Porte F, d'Honneur G, Duvaldestin P. Neuromuscular effects of rocuronium on the diaphragm and adductor pollicis muscles in anesthetized patients. Anesthesiol. 1994 Sep;81(3):585-90.

Abouleish E, Abboud T, Lechevalier T, Zhu J, Chalian A, Alford K. Rocuronium (Org 9426) for caesarean section. BJA: Br J Anaesthes. 1994 Sep 1;73(3):336-41.

Wright PM, Caldwell JE, Miller RD. Onset and duration of rocuronium and succinylcholine at the adductor pollicis and laryngeal adductor muscles in anesthetized humans. Anesthesiol. 1994 Nov;81(5):1110-5.

Adamus M, Koutna J, Gabrhelik T, Hubackova M, Janaskova E. Influence of gender on the onset and duration of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block. Biomed Papers Med Faculty Palacky Uni Olomouc. 2007 Dec 1;151(2).

Baraka AS, Sayyid SS, Assaf BA. Thiopental-rocuronium versus ketamine-rocuronium for rapid-sequence intubation in parturients undergoing cesarean section. Anesthesia Analgesia. 1997 May 1;84(5):1104-7.

Hemmerling TM, Schmidt J, Wolf T, Klein P, Jacobi K. Comparison of succinylcholine with two doses of rocuronium using a new method of monitoring neuromuscular block at the laryngeal muscles by surface laryngeal electromyography. Br J Anaesthes. 2000 Aug 1;85(2):251-5.

Pühringer FK, Khuenl-Brady KS, Koller J, Mitterschiffthaler G. Evaluation of the endotracheal intubating conditions of rocuronium (ORG 9426) and succinylcholine in outpatient surgery. Anesthes Analges. 1992 Jul;75(1):37-40.

Wicks TC. The pharmacology of rocuronium bromide (ORG 9426). AANA J. 1994 Feb;62:33-8.

Shukla A, Dubey KP, Sharma MS. Comparative evaluation of haemodynamic effects and intubating conditions after the administration of org 9426 (rocuronium) and succinylcholine. Ind J Anaesth. 2004;48(6):476-9.

Devi UR, Srinivas VY, Shivaramu BT. Intubating conditions with two different doses of rocuronium bromide for caesarean section: A comparative study. J Evol Med Dental Sci. 2014;3(57):12947-56.