DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20184056

Comparison of effect of isobaric bupivacaine vs hyperbaric bupivacaine on haemodynamic variables in thorcic combined spinal epidural anaesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomies

Loveleen Kour, Kuldip C. Gupta

Abstract


Background: Regional anaesthesia has always been an attractive option for laparoscopic surgeries in patients who are not fit for general anaesthesia. Also, regional anaesthesia has certain advantages over general anaesthesia like lesser oropharyngeal morbidity, lesser blood loss and decreased chances of thrombosis. Lumbar spinal anaesthesia has been synonymous with the term regional anaesthesia for laparoscopic surgeries for quite some time now. In the light of recent works by Imbelloni and Zundert, thoracic spinal anaesthesia has been shown to be a promising alternative not only for healthy patients but for high risk patients as well. Baricity defines the density of the drug with respect to CSF density. This undoubtedly makes it is one of the most important factors that influence drug distribution in the subarachnoid space. Drugs of differing baricities have been studied previously in lumbar spinal anaesthesia. We aimed at studying the behaviour of isobaric and hyperbaric bupivacaine using a different approach which in this study was thoracic combined spinal epidural anaesthesia. Authors evaluated the haemodynamic changes as well as neurological and any other post operative complications that occurred in any of the patients.

Methods: There were 60 ASA I and II patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy who were chosen for this study. They were randomly divided into two equal groups - group I and group H. Thoracic combined spinal epidural anaesthesia (CSE) was performed at T9-T10 / T10-T11 interspace. Patients in group I received 1.5ml of isobaric bupivacaine 0.5% (5mg/ml) + 25µg (0.5ml) of fentanyl and group H patients were given 1.5ml of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (5mg/ml) + 25µg (0.5ml) of fentanyl.

Results: There was no significant difference among the haemodynamic variables between the two groups and no neurological complication was seen in any patient.

Conclusions: Thoracic combined spinal epidural anaesthesia allows haemodynamic stability in laparoscopic cholecystectomies with minimal neurological and post operative complications irrespective of baricity of the drug used.


Keywords


Haemodynamics, Hyperbaric bupivacaine, Isobaric bupivacaine, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Thoracic combined spinal epidural anaesthesia

Full Text:

PDF

References


Jonnesco T. General spinal analgesia. Br Med J. 1909; 2:1396-401.

Imbelloni LE, Quirici MB, Ferraz Filho JR, Cordeiro JA, Ganem EM. The anatomy of the thoracic spinal canal investigated with magnetic resonance imaging. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2010 May 1;110(5):1494-5.

Lee RA, van Zundert AA, Botha CP, Lataster LA, van Zundert TC, van der Ham WG, et al. The anatomy of the thoracic spinal canal in different postures: a magnetic resonance imaging investigation. Regional anesthesia and pain medicine. 2010 Jul 1;35(4):364-9.

Imbelloni LE, Pitombo PF, Ganem EM. The Incidence of paresthesia and neurologic complications after lower spinal thoracic puncture with cut needle compared to pencil point needle. Study in 300 Patients. J Anesth Clin Res. 2010;1:106.

Imbelloni LE, Grigorio R, Fialho JC, Fornasari M, Pitombo PF. Thoracic spinal anesthesia with low doses of local anesthetics decreases the latency time, motor block and cardiovascular changes. Study in 636 patients. J Anesthe Clinic Res S. 2011;11.

Møller IW, Fernandes A, Edstrom HH. Subarachnoid anaesthesia with 0.5% bupivacaine: Effects of density. Br J Anaesth. 1984;56:1191-5.

Chambers WA, Edstrom HH, Scott DB. Effect of baricity on spinal anaesthesia with bupivacaine. Br J Anaesth. 1981;53:279-82.

Hogan QH, Prost R, Kulier A, Taylor ML, Liu S, Mark L. Magnetic resonance imaging of cerebrospinal fluid volume and the influence of body habitus and abdominal pressure. Anesthesiology: J Ame Soc Anesthesiol. 1996 Jun 1;84(6):1341-9.

Hogan Q. Size of human lower thoracic and lumbosacral nerve roots. Anesthesiology. 1996;85:37-42.

Van Zundert AA, Stultiens G, Jakimowicz JJ, Peek D, Van der Ham WG, Korsten HH, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under segmental thoracic spinal anaesthesia: a feasibility study. Bri J Anaesthe. 2007 Mar 19;98(5):682-6.

Solakovic N. Comparison of haemodynamic effects of isobaric and hyperbaric bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia. MED ARH. 2010;64(1):11-4.

Logan MR, Mc Clure JH, Wildsmith JA. Plain bupivacaine: An unpredictable spinal anaesthetic agent. Br J Anaesth. 1986;58:292.

Smith T. The lumbar spine and subarachnoid block. Anesthesiology .1968;29:6014.

Helmi M, Uyun Y, Suwondo BS, Widodo U. Comparison of intrathecal use of isobaric and hyperbaric bupivacaine during lower abdomen surgery. Journal of Anesthesiology. 2014;2014.

Imbelloni LE, Gouveia MA. A comparison of thoracic spinal anesthesia with low-dose isobaric and low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine for orthopedic surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Anesth Essays Res. 2014;8(1):26-31.

Imbelloni LE, Sant’Anna R, Fornasari M, Fialho JC. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anesthesia: comparative study between conventional-dose and low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine. Local and Regional Anesthesia. 2011;4:41-4.