Ureteric double-J stent related complications: a single tertiary care center experience from South India


  • Maliikarjuna Gurram Department of Urology, Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
  • Ravichander G. Department of Urology, Gandhi Medical College, Secunderabad, Telangana, India
  • Ravi Jagirdhar Department of Urology, Gandhi Medical College, Secunderabad, Telangana, India
  • Praveen Chandra Department of Urology, Gandhi Medical College, Secunderabad, Telangana, India




Cystolithotripsy, DJ stent, Encrustation, Irritable bladder symptoms, Retained stent


Background: The double-J (DJ) ureteral stents is most commonly used urological procedure and is associated with complications. This study was done to analyse the complications of ureteral DJ stents, modalities of management and outcomes.

Methods: The present study is a prospective observational study of patients who presented with DJ stent related complications between February 2016 and November 2017. Patients were evaluated by history, examination, urine analysis, cultures, KUB ultrasonography, abdominal roentgenogram, CT-KUB, intravenous urogram and DTPA renogram. Complications like fever, hematuria and irritable bladder symptoms were managed conservatively. Patients with stent migration underwent endoscopic removal. Combined endourological procedures were performed in single or staged manner in cases with retained DJS with encrustation.

Results: Total 120 patients presented with DJ stent complications during the study period. Males were 63.3% and females 36.7%. The mean age was 31.5 years. The majority 65.33% of the stents were placed for postsurgical prophylaxis. Irritable bladder symptoms 42.5% was most common complication, followed by retained stent with encrustation 17.5%, fever 15.9%, hematuria 13.3%, stent migration 5.8% and retained sent with minimal and no encrustation 5%. Stent removal was done in 47 (39.16%) patients; all patients with retained stent, stent migration, 5 (26.3%) patients with fever and 8 (15.6%) patients with irritable bladder symptoms. Common site of encrustation was bladder alone and kidney with bladder in 5 (23.80%) patients each. The mean stent indwelling time was 3.2 years. Twenty-one (17.5%) patients required combined endourological procedures such as cystolithotripsy (CLT), ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) with intracorporal lithotripsy. One (4.76%) patient required nephrectomy.

Conclusions: Double-J stent is an important tool to prevent and relieve obstruction. Their use must be strictly restricted to selected cases with proper documentation, counseling and close tracking. Encrustation in forgotten stents should be managed with stent removal with combined endourologic techniques.


Saltzman B. Ureteral stents. Indications, variations, and complications. Urol Clinics of north America. 1988 Aug;15(3):481-91.

LeRoy AJ, Williams Jr HJ, Segura JW, Patterson DE, Benson Jr RC. Indwelling ureteral stents: percutaneous management of complications. Radiology. 1986 Jan;158(1):219-22.

Singh I, Gupta NP, Hemal AK, Aron M, Seth A, Dogra PN. Severely encrusted polyurethane ureteral stents: management and analysis of potential risk factors. Urology. 2001 Oct 1;58(4):526-31.

Lam JS, Gupta M. Tips and tricks for the management of retained ureteral stents. J Endourol. 2002 Dec 1;16(10):733-41.

Nawaz H, Hussain M, Hashmi A, Hussain Z, Zafar N, Naqvi A, et al. Experience with indwelling JJ ureteral stents. JPMA. 1993 Aug;43(8):147-9.

Memon NA, Talpur AA, Memon JM. Indications and complications of indwelling ureteral stenting at NMCH, Nawabshah. Pak J of Surg. 2007;23(3):187-91.

Pansota MS, Rasool M, Saleem MS, Tabassum SA, Hussain A. Indications and complications of double J ureteral stenting: our experience. Gomal J Med Sci. 2013 Jul 2;11(1).

Arshad M, Shah SS, Abbasi MH. Applications and complications of polyurethane stenting in urology. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2006;18(2):69-72.

Richter S, Ringel A, Shalev M, Nissenkorn I. The indwelling ureteric stent: a ‘friendly’ procedure with unfriendly high morbidity. BJU Int. 2000 Mar;85(4):408-11.

Eisner B, Kim H, Sacco D. Repeat knot formation in a patient with an indwelling ureteral stent. International Braz J Urol. 2006 Jun;32(3):308-9.

Lojanapiwat B. Endourologic management of severely encrusted ureteral stents. J Med Assoc Thailand. 2005 Sep;88(9):1203.

Aravantinos E, Gravas S, Karatzas AD, Tzortzis V, Melekos M. Forgotten, encrusted ureteral stents: a challenging problem with an endourologic solution. J Endourol. 2006 Dec 1;20(12):1045-9.

Somers WJ. Management of forgotten or retained indwelling ureteral stents. Urology. 1996 Mar 1;47(3):431-5.

Mohan-Pillai K, Keeley Jr FX, Moussa SA, Smith G, Tolley DA. Endourological management of severely encrusted ureteral stents. J Endourol. 1999 Jun;13(5):377-9.

Bultitude MF, Tiptaft RC, Glass JM, Dasgupta P. Management of encrusted ureteral stents impacted in upper tract. Urol. 2003 Oct 1;62(4):622-6.

Bhansali M, Patankar S, Dobhada S. Laparoscopic management of a retained heavily encrusted ureteral stent. Int J Urol. 2006 Aug;13(8):1141-3.

Borboroglu PG, Kane CJ. Current management of severely encrusted ureteral stents with a large associated stone burden. J Urol. 2000 Sep 1;164(3):648-50.

Bukkapatnam R, Seigne J, Helal M. 1-step removal of encrusted retained ureteral stents. J Urol. 2003 Oct 1;170(4):1111-4.

Gorman SP, Tunney MM, Keane PF, Van Bladel K, Bley B. Characterization and assessment of a novel poly (ethylene oxide)/polyurethane composite hydrogel (Aquavene®) as a ureteral stent biomaterial. J Biomed Materials Res. 1998 Mar 15;39(4):642-9.

Riedl CR, Witkowski M, Plas E, Pflueger H. Heparin coating reduces encrustation of ureteral stents: a preliminary report. Int J Antimicrobial Agents. 2002 Jun 1;19(6):507-10.

Watterson JD, Cadieux PA, Beiko DT, Cook AJ, Burton JP, Harbottle RR, et al. Oxalate-degrading enzymes from Oxalobacter formigenes: a novel device coating to reduce urinary tract biomaterial-related encrustation. J Endourol. 2003 Jun 1;17(5):269-74.

Zupkas P, Parsons CL, Percival C, Monga M. Pentosanpolysulfate coating of silicone reduces encrustation. J Endourol. 2000 Aug;14(6):483-8.




How to Cite

Gurram, M., G., R., Jagirdhar, R., & Chandra, P. (2018). Ureteric double-J stent related complications: a single tertiary care center experience from South India. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 6(12), 3846–3851. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20184698



Original Research Articles