Risk factors in oral carcinoma and the relationship between tumor thickness and regional nodal involvement: a pilot study in a semi urban population in New Delhi, India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20170655Keywords:
Oral carcinoma, Regional lymph nodes, Risk factorsAbstract
Background: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is a major public health problem worldwide, with approximately 275,000 cases annually and a strong association with risk factors like smoking. It is a subtype of head & neck cancer involving the oral cavity. The present study evaluated the role of various risk factors in the development of oral carcinoma among our patient population.
Methods: A total of 40 cases of oral carcinoma with radical neck dissection were evaluated. Data on the age, personal history and presenting clinical features were analyzed. The depth of the tumor and the maximum tumor thickness were carefully evaluated. Also, pathological T-stage, the presence/absence of vascular and peri-neural infiltration was evaluated in each case. The presence of nodal metastases and the stage of the tumor was assessed. Data was tabulated and correlation of nodal metastasis with tumor thickness, pathological T-stage, vascular invasion, and peri-neural infiltration was evaluated by appropriate statistical analysis method.
Results: A total of 40 cases, 82.5% males and 17.5% females, were all smokers with history of consumption of smoking or smokeless or both. Tongue was the most common site of oral carcinoma (37.5%) involvement, histological characterization of all were Squamous cell carcinoma with majority of the patients in pathological stage II. A significant association between the tumor thickness and metastasis was also seen.
Conclusions: The tumor thickness of oral squamous cell carcinoma was found to be an important prognostic indicator for the occurrence of metastases to the regional cervical lymph nodes.
References
Sankaranarayanan R, Ramadas K, Thomas G, Muwonge R, Thara S, Mathew B et al. Effect of screening on oral cancer mortality in Kerala, India: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 2005;365:1927-33.
Lozano, R. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. The Lancet. 2012;380(9859): 2095-128.
Byakodi R, Byakodi S, Hiremath S, Byakodi J, Adaki S, Marathe K et al. Oral cancer in India: an epidemiologic and clinical review. J Community Health. 2012;37:316-9.
Omar EA. The outline of prognosis and new advances in diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC): review of the literature. J Oral Oncol. 2013;2013:Article ID 519312.
Oliveira AMLC, Wagner VP, Filho MS, Carrard VC, Hugo FN, Martins MD. A 10-year analysis of the oral squamous cell carcinoma profile in patients from public health centers in Uruguay. Braz Oral Res [online]. 2015;29:1-8
Warnakulasuriya S. Global epidemiology of oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Oral Oncol. 2009;45:309-16.
International Agency for Research on Cancer. Tobacco smoke and involuntary smoking. IARC Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risk to humans, Lyon, IARC, France 2004;83:53.
Coelho BKR. Challenges of the Oral Cancer Burden in India. J Cancer Epidemiol. 2012, Article ID 701932.
Jha P, Jacob B, Gajalakshmi V, Gupta PC, Dhingra N, Kumar R et al. A nationally representative case-control study of smoking and death in India. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008;358:1137-47.
Gupta PC, Mehta HC. Cohort study of all-cause mortality among tobacco users in Mumbai, India. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2000;78(7):877-83.
Balaram, P, Sridhar. H, Rajkumar, T, Vaccarella S, Herrero R, Nandakumar A, et al. Oral cancer in southern India: the influence of smoking, drinking, paan-chewing and oral hygiene. Int. J. Cancer. 2002;98:440-5.
Keski-Santti H, Atula T, Tornwall J, Koivunen P, Makitie A. Elective neck treatment versus observation in patients with T1/T2 N0 squamous cell carcinoma of oral tongue. Oral Oncol. 2006;42:96-101.
Kowalski LP, Medina JE. Nodal metastases: predictive factors. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1998;31:621-637.
Breslow A. Thickness, cross-sectional areas and depth of invasion in the prognosis of cutaneous melanoma. Annals Surg. 1970;172:902-8.
J A Woolgar. Histopathological prognosticators in oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol.2006;42:229-39.
O-charoenrat P, Pillai G, Patel S, Ficher C, Archer D, Eccles S, et al. Tumor thickness predicts cervical nodal metastases and survival in early oral tongue cancer. Oral Oncol. 2003;39:386-90.
Gonzales-Moles MA, Esteban F, Rodriguez-Archilla A, Ruiz- Avila I, Gonzales-Moles S. Importance of tumour thickness measurement in prognosis of tongue cancer. Oral Oncol. 2002;38:394-7.
Pentenero M, Gandolfo S, Carrozzo M. Importance of tumor thickness and depth of invasion in nodal involvement and prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma: a review of the literature. Head Neck. 2005;27:1080-91.
Moore C, Kuhns JG, Greenberg RA. Thickness as prognostic aid in upper aerodigestive tract cancer. Arch Surg. 1986;121:1410-14.
Kane SV, Gupta M, Kakade AC, D'Cruz A. Depth of invasion is the most significant histological predictor of subclinical cervical lymph node metastasis in early squamous carcinomas of the oral cavity. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006;32:795-803.
Buettner P, Garbe C, Guggenmoos-Holzmann I. Problems in defining cutoff points of continuous prognostic factors: example of tumor thickness in primary cutaneous melanoma. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:1201-10.