Medical students perception of ultrasound and computed tomography sessions in gross anatomy curriculum: a study in an Indian medical college


  • Subhramoy Chaudhury Department of Anatomy, North Bengal Medical College and Hospital, West Bengal, India
  • Anasuya Ghosh Department of Anatomy, North Bengal Medical College and Hospital, West Bengal, India
  • Narayan Pandit Department of Radio Diagnosis, North Bengal Medical College and Hospital, West Bengal, India
  • Asit Chandra Roy Department of Radio Diagnosis, North Bengal Medical College and Hospital, West Bengal, India
  • Shankar Prasad Kabiraj Department of Radio Diagnosis, North Bengal Medical College and Hospital, West Bengal, India



Anatomy teaching, Medical students’ perception, Ultrasonography and CT scan


Background: Integration of Ultrasonography (USG) and Computed Tomography (CT) sessions into medical curriculum has been started and numerous studies show that they could be useful in anatomy teaching as an adjunct to traditional ways including didactic lectures, cadaveric material or 3D models. Information regarding the benefit and feasibility of integrating radiology sessions into Indian medical curriculum is still lacking.

Methods: We introduced didactic and practical sessions of USG and CT focusing on Liver morphology into first year anatomy course and found out student’ perception by Likert- scale type questionnaire at the end. We collected opinions once again from the same cohort during their clinical rotations as junior doctors regarding the effectiveness of radiological sessions at very beginning of their career.

Results: The first year students stated that radiology sessions were very interesting (97%) and effective (95%) to improve their anatomy understanding, 93% indicated it will make them more confident while taking practical examinations, 97% indicated such sessions should be incorporated in current anatomy curriculum. Majority of junior doctors (88% of responders) accepted the importance of early exposure to practical radiology in medical curriculum and recommended to include practical USG and CT sessions in anatomy course.

Conclusions: This study was first to experiment the impact of practical radiology sessions in anatomy and collect feedback from both first year students and junior doctors in an Indian medical college. Our study shows it is possible and beneficial to include structured ultrasonography and CT sessions to the present MBBS curriculum in conjunction with traditional teaching methods.


McLachlan JC, Patten D. Anatomy teaching: ghosts of the past, present and future. Med Educ. 2006;40:243-53.

Aziz MA, McKenzie JC, Wilson JS, Cowie RJ, Ayeni SA, Dunn BK. The human cadaver in the age of biomedical informatics. Anat Rec. 2002;269:20-32.

Pawlina W, Lachman N. Dissection in learning and teaching gross anatomy: Rebuttal to McLachlan. Anat Rec. 2004;281:9-11.

Gunderman RB, Wilson PK. Viewpoint: Exploring the human interior: The roles of cadaver dissection and radiologic imaging in teaching anatomy. Acad Med. 2005;80:745-9.

Patten D, Donnelly L, Richards S. Studying living anatomy: The use of portable ultrasound in the undergraduate medical curriculum. IJOCS. 2010;4:72-6.

Rizzolo LJ, Stewart WB, O’Brien M, Haims A, Rando W, Abrahams J, Dunne S, Wang S, Aden M. Design principles for developing an efficient clinical anatomy course. Med Teach. 2006;28:142-51.

Chan LK, Ganguly PK. Evaluation of small group teaching in human gross anatomy in a Caribbean medical school. Anat Sci Educ. 2008;1:19-22.

Barnett SB, Kossoff G, Edwards MJ. Is diagnostic ultrasound safe? Current international consensus on the thermal mechanism. Med J Aust. 1994;160:33-7.

Butter J, Grant TH, Egan M. Does ultrasound training boost Year 1 medical student competence and confidence when learning abdominal examination? Med Educ. 2007;41:843-8.

Ivanusic J, Cowie B, Barrington M. Undergraduate student perceptions of the use of ultrasonography in the study of “living anatomy”. Anat Sci Educ. 2010;3:318-22.

Sugand K, Abrahams P, Khurana A. The anatomy of anatomy: A review for its modernization. Anat Sci Educ. 2010;3:83-93.

Teichgräber UK, Meyer JM, Poulson Nautrup C, von Rautenfeld DB. Ultrasound anatomy: a practical teaching system in human gross anatomy. Med Educ. 1996;30:296-8.

Heilo A, Hansen AB, Holck P, Laerum F. Ultrasound ‘electronic vivisection’ in the teaching of human anatomy for medical students. Eur J Ultrasound. 1997;5:203-7.

Rao S, Holsbeeck LB, Musial JL et al. A pilot study of comprehensive ultrasound education at the Wayne State University School of Medicine. J Ultrasound Med. 2008;27:745-9.

Zumwalt AC, Lufler RS, Monteiro J, Shaffer K. Building the body: active learning laboratories that emphasize practical aspects of anatomy and integration with radiology. Anat Sci Educ. 2010;3(3):134-40.

Mircea PA, Badea R, Fodor D, Buzoianu AD. Using ultrasonography as a teaching support tool in undergraduate medical education-time to reach a decision. Medical Ultrasonography. 2012;14:211-6.

Tshibwabwa ET, Groves HM. Integration of ultrasound in the education programme in anatomy. Med Educ. 2005;39:1148.

Tshibwabwa ET, Groves HM, Levine MA. Teaching musculoskeletal ultrasound in the undergraduate medical curriculum. Med Educ. 2007;41:517-8.

Wicke W, Brugger PC, Firbas W. Teaching ultrasound of the abdomen and the pelvic organs in the medicine curriculum in Vienna. Med Educ. 2003;37:476.

Wittich CM, Montgomery SC, Neben MA, Palmer BA, Callahan MJ, Seward JB, Pawlina W, Bruce CJ. Teaching cardiovascular anatomy to medical students by using a handheld ultrasound device. JAMA. 2002;288:1062-3.

Yoo MC, Villegas L, Jones DB. Basic ultrasound curriculum for medical students: validation of content and phantom. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2004;14:374-9.

Lufler RS, Zumwalt AC, Romney CA, Hoagland TM. Incorporating radiology into medical gross anatomy: Does the use of cadaver CT scans improve students’ academic performance in anatomy? Anat Sci Educ. 2010;3:56-63.

Jang HW, Oh CS, Choe YH, Jang DS. Use of dynamic images in radiology education: Movies of CT and MRI in the anatomy classroom. Anatomical sciences education. 2018 Nov;11(6):547-53.

Kumar PA, Jothi R, Mathivanan D. Self-directed learning modules of CT scan images to improve students' perception of gross anatomy. Education for Health. 2016;29:152-5.

Slon V, Hershkovitz I, May H. The value of cadaver CT scans in gross anatomy laboratory. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;7:80-2.

Machado JA, Barbosa JM, Ferreira MA. Student perspectives of imaging anatomy in undergraduate medical education. Anat Sci Educ. 2013;6:163-9.

Gunderman RB, Siddiqui AR, Heitkamp DE. The vital role of radiology in the medical school curriculum. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:1239-42.

Bohl M, Francois W, Gest T. Self-guided clinical cases for medical students based on postmortem CT scans of cadavers. Clin Anat. 2011;24:655-6.

Nagar SK. Newer approaches of anatomy teaching. National J Med Res. 2012;2:1.

Brown B, Adhikari S, Marx J, Lander L, Todd GL. Introduction of ultrasound into gross anatomy curriculum: perceptions of medical students. J Emergency Med. 2012;1:5.

Philips AW, Smith SG, Ross CF, Straus CM. Direct correlation of radiologic and cadaveric structures in a gross anatomy course. Medical Teacher. 2012;34(12):e779-e784.




How to Cite

Chaudhury, S., Ghosh, A., Pandit, N., Roy, A. C., & Kabiraj, S. P. (2019). Medical students perception of ultrasound and computed tomography sessions in gross anatomy curriculum: a study in an Indian medical college. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 7(4), 1265–1270.



Original Research Articles