Determination of subcarinal angle of trachea using computed tomography

Authors

  • Arshed Hussain Parry Department of Radiodiagnosis, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
  • Abdul Haseeb Wani Department of Radiodiagnosis, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
  • Yassar Shiekh Department of Radiodiagnosis, Government Medical College Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
  • Tariq A. Gojwari Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20191526

Keywords:

Carina, Helical computed tomography, Minimum intensity projection, Multiplanar reconstruction, Subcarinal angle, Tracheal bifurcation

Abstract

Background: Change in tracheal bifurcation angle (subcarinal angle) is an indirect marker of various cardiac, pulmonary and mediastinal pathologies. Helical computed tomography (CT) allows acquisition of volumetric set of data of the chest and can be used for accurate measurements of subcarinal angle using reconstructed images on a workstation using minimum intensity projection (MinIP).The objective of this study was to estimate normal subcarinal angle (SCA) of trachea by computed tomography and to assess its relationship with gender.

Methods: This was an observational study comprising a study cohort of 552 patients comprising of 312 males and 240 females who were subjected to CT chest for various indications in our department. Patients with no underlying cardiac, mediastinal or pulmonary disease were included in the study. Spiral CT scan of chest was performed on 64-slice seimens CT SOMATOM and images were reconstructed with thickness of 1.5mm and the images were viewed in coronal reformatted minimum intensity projection (MinIP) for determination of subcarinal angle using the angle measuring tool provided in the workstation

Results: The mean subcarinal angle (SCA) in males was (67.60±14.55). The mean subcarinal angle (SCA) in females was (78.90±11.04). Females had a higher mean SCA compared to males with a statistically significant difference (p-value <0.05).

Conclusions: The mean SCA in females was higher compared to males with a statistically significant difference between the two. This study holds practical relevance with regard to the performance of invasive trachea-bronchial procedures like bronchoscopy and tracheal/bronchial intubation.

References

Khade B, Waheed AR, Yadav N, Diwan CV. Study of sub carinal angle of human trachea by computerized tomography. Int J Anat Res. 2016;4(3):2828-32.

Fernandes SF, Pradhan A. Estimation of subcarinal angle using minimum intensity projection in computed tomography. Asian J Pharm Clinic Res. 2018;11(4):383-5.

Choorat S, Totanarungroj K, Muangman N. Assessment of normal subcarinal angle on chest radiographs in adult Thai population. Sir Med J. 2008;60:264-6.

Standring S, Ellis H, Healy JC, Johnson D, Williams A. Gray's Anatomy. 40th [sup] ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2008:894-903.

Lin C, Lee JH, Hsieh CM. The correlation between subcarinal angle and left atrial volume. Acta Cardiol Sinica. 2012;28(4):332-6.

Murray JG, Brown AL, Anagnostou EA, Senior R. Widening of the tracheal bifurcation on chest radiographs: value as a sign of left atrial enlargement. AJR. Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164(5):1089-92.

Perandini S, Faccioli N, Zaccarella A, Re TJ, Mucelli RP. The diagnostic contribution of CT volumetric rendering techniques in routine practice. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2010;20(2):92.

Alavi SM, Keats TE, O'brien WM. The angle of tracheal bifurcation: its normal mensuration. Am J Roentgenol. 1970;108(3):546-9.

Karabulut N. CT assessment of tracheal carinal angle and its determinants. British J Radiol. 2005;78(933):787-90.

Kamel KS, Lau G, Stringer MD. In vivo and in vitro morphometry of the human trachea. Clinical anatomy: The official J Am Assoc Clinic Anatom British Assoc Clinic Anatomists. 2009;22(5):571-9.

Haskin PH, Goodman LR. Normal tracheal bifurcation angle: a reassessment. Am J Roentgenol. 1982;139(5):879-82.

Coppola V, Vallone G, Coscioni E, Coppola M, Maraziti G, Alfinito M, et al. Normal value of the tracheal bifurcation angle and correlation with left atrial volume. La Radiologia Medica. 1998;95(5):461-5.

Chunder R, Guha R. A morphometric study of human subcarinal angle in different age groups in both sexes and its clinical implications. Indian J Basic Appl Med Res. 2015;4(2):424-30.

Reed JM, O'Connor DM, Myer CM. Magnetic resonance imaging determination of tracheal orientation in normal children: practical implications. Archives Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg. 1996;122(6):605-8.

Chen JT, Putman CE, Hedlund LW, Dahmash NS, Roberts L. Widening of the subcarinal angle by pericardial effusion. Am J Roentgenol. 1982;139(5):883-7.

Downloads

Published

2019-04-26

How to Cite

Parry, A. H., Wani, A. H., Shiekh, Y., & Gojwari, T. A. (2019). Determination of subcarinal angle of trachea using computed tomography. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 7(5), 1527–1530. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20191526

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles