DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20192523

Comparing retrograde urethrography readings with intraoperative findings in urethral stricture

Tanvi Subhash Kelkar, Anil Joshi

Abstract


Background: Urethral strictures are relatively common in men with most patients acquiring the disease due to injury or infection. The present study was conducted to assess the accuracy of retrograde urethrography (RGU) in diagnosing urethral strictures in patients presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms.

Methods: All male patients presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms and referred for retrograde urethrogram to the Department of Radiodiagnosis, Bharati Vidyapeeth Medical College and Hospital (Deemed to be University), Sangli from November 2018 till January 2019 were included. The parameters of RGU were compared with intra-operative findings as gold standard to calculate the operating characteristics of RGU.

Results: The present study included 42 patients, mean age 54.9±11.2 years. Grade I urethral stricture was observed in 42.8% and 26% had grade II stricture. Bulbar stricture was the most common location. The common presenting complaints were increased frequency (50%) and dribbling micturition (40.4%). Approximately one tenth of all patients had a history of trauma. RGU was 100% sensitive and 66.7% specific in detecting strictures of less than 2 cm. Overall accuracy of RGU in detecting urethral strictures of less than 2 cm was 83.3%.

Conclusions: RGU is a reliable means for establishing the diagnosis of a suspected urethral stricture and also provides accurate staging information with regard to stricture number, length, location, and coexistent urethral pathology.


Keywords


Anterior urethral stricture, Diagnostic accuracy, Retrograde urethrography

Full Text:

PDF

References


Lumen N, Hoebeke P, Willemsen P, et al. Etiology of urethral stricture disease in the 21st century. J Urol. 2009;182:983.

Kawashima A, Sandler CM, Wasserman NF, LeRoy AJ, King BF, Goldman SM. Imaging of urethral disease: a pictorial review. Radio Graphics. 2005;24:S145-S216.

Breyer BN, Cooperberg MR, McAninch JW, Master VA. Improper retrograde urethrogram technique leads to incorrect diagnosis. J Urol. 2009;182:716-7.

Zhang XM, Hu WL, He HX, Lv J, Nie HB, Yao HQ, et al. Diagnosis of male posterior urethral stricture: comparison of 64-MDCT urethrography vs. standard urethrography. Abdominal Imaging. 2011 Dec 1;36(6):771-5.

Maciejewski C, Rourke K. Imaging of urethral stricture disease. Translational Androl Urol. 2015 Feb;4(1):2.

Peskar DB, Perovic AV. Stricture of the male urethra: how to perform and evaluate radiourethrography and sonourethrography to avoid mistakes. Radiol Oncol. 2008;34(2): 17584.

Gallentine ML, Morey AF. Imaging of the male urethra for stricture disease. Urol Clin North Am. 2002;29:361-72.

Heinerich A, Derschum W, Bonfig R, Wilbert DM. Ultrasond of urethral stricture disease: a prospective study in 175 patients. Br J Urol. 2011;74:93-8.

Morey AF, McAninch JW. Role of preoperative sonourethrography in bulbar urethral reconstruction. J Urol. 2012;158(4):1376-9.

Angermeier KW, Rourke KF, Dubey D, Forsyth RJ, Gonzalez CM. SIU/ICUD Consultation on Urethral Strictures: Evaluation and follow-up. Urol. 2014;83(3):S8-17.

Bach P, Rourke K. Independently interpreted retrograde urethrography does not accurately diagnose and stage anterior urethral stricture: the importance of urologist-performed urethrography. Urol. 2014;83(5):1190-4.