CT evaluation of anatomical variations of paranasal sinus region and their clinical importance

Tapendra Nath Tiwari; Narendra Kumar Kardam

doi:10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20192509

Authors

Tapendra Nath Tiwari Department of Radiodiagnosis, RNT Medical College, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
Narendra Kumar Kardam Department of Radiodiagnosis, RNT Medical College, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20192509

Keywords:

Anatomical variations, Computed tomography, Sinusitis

Abstract

Background: Paranasal sinuses are air filled spaces present within the skull and facial bones. Paranasal sinuses region anatomy is highly variable. Knowledge of these variations is very important for radiologists as well as endoscopic surgeons for preoperative evaluation to avoid damage to adjacent vital structures. CT is the best modality to delineate the sinus anatomy as well as soft tissue structures. Thus, this study was undertaken to evaluate the anatomical variations of paranasal sinus region and ascertain their clinical importance.

Methods: A total of 142 patients, those referred from various outdoor/indoor departments with the symptoms related to nose and paranasal sinuses were included. Detailed history, appropriate clinical examinations, biochemical investigations and X-ray PNS were recorded. Unenhanced CT scan of the PNS was performed for these patients in the axial planes and reformatted coronal planes. Observation was made and analysed using descriptive tools and scientific methods.

Results: Deviated nasal septum was the most common variation followed by middle concha bullosa, Paradoxical middle turbinate, curved uncinate process, overpneumatized ethmoidal bulla, superior concha bullosa, prominent Agger Nasi cells, haller cells, onodi cells, maxillary sinus septae and pneumatization of uncinate process. Incidence of anatomical variation was 75% among the patients showing PNS mucosal changes while it was 94% among patients showing no mucosal changes. Chi square statics revealed that presence of anatomical variation does not mean a predisposition to mucosal changes.

Conclusions: The presence of anatomical variants does not indicate predisposition to sinus pathology but may predispose to increased risk of intraoperative complications. It is important to pay close attention to anatomical variations in the preoperative evaluation to avoid possible complications.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Stammberger Heinz. Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: The Messerklinger Technique. 1991;17-8.

Stammberger H, Wolf G. Headaches and sinus disease: the endoscopic approach. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1988;134:3-23.

Blaugrund SM. The nasal septum and concha bullosa. OCNA. 1989;22 (2): 291-305.

Patle BK, Umarji H. CT scan evaluation of maxillary sinus pathologies: Intrinsic and Extrinsic. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol. 2010;22(1):4-9.

Bolger WE, Parsons DS and Butzin, CA. Paranasal sinus bony anatomic variations and mucosal abnormalities: CT analysis for endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope. 1991;101:56-64.

Baradaranfar MH, Labibi M. Anatomical variations of paranasal sinuses in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and their correlation with CT scan staging. Acta Medica Iranica. 2007;45(6):477-80.

Pérez-Piñas I, Sabate J, Carmona A, Catalina HC, Jimenez CJ. Anatomical variations in the human paranasal sinus region studied by CT J Anatomy. 2000;197(2):221-7.

Dua K, Chopra H, Khurana AS, Munjal M. CT Scan variations in Chronic Sinusitis. Ind J Radiol Imag 2005;15:315-20.

Zeinreich SJ, Kennedy DW, Rosenbaum AE. Paranasal sinuses: CT imaging requirements for endoscopic surgery. Radiol. 1987;163:769-75.

Keros P. On the practical value of differences in the level of the lamina cribrosa of the ethmoid. Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol. 1992;41:809-13.

Maru Y K, Gupta V. Anatomic variations of the bone in sinnasal CT. Indian J of Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;53(2):123-8.

Kaplanoglu H, Kaplanoglu V, Dilli A, Toprak U, Hekimoğlu B. An analysis of the anatomic variations of the paranasal sinuses and ethmoid roof using computed tomography. Eurasian J Med. 2013;45(2):115-25.