Relationship of qSOFA values to gastric perforation patients in A. W. Sjahranie General Hospital, Samarinda, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20192890Keywords:
Gastric perforation, Peptic ulcer, qSOFA, SepsisAbstract
Background: Authors hypothesized the qSOFA score would be useful in sepsis patients caused by gastric perforation. The present study investigated the relationship of qSOFA value to outcome of patients with gastric perforation in Samarinda.
Methods: This research was analytical, descriptive research method using cross-sectional study design 70 patients. Data analysis was obtained to see the relationship between age, gender, vital sign qSOFA and survival in gastric perforation patients.
Results: Mean systolic blood pressure was significantly higher in subjects who lived than those who died, i.e. 105.5 vs 92.5 (p <0.001). Mean diastolic blood pressure was significantly higher in subjects who lived than those who died, ie 80.0 vs 66.8 (p <0.001). The respiration rate was significantly lower in subjects who lived than those who died, namely 22.9 vs 24.6 (p <0.001). The mean GCS score was significantly higher in subjects who lived than those who died, ie 14.2 vs 12.2 (p <0.001).
Conclusions: The higher the qSOFA score in the study subjects with gastric perforation, the higher the mortality rate. There was a relationship between the qSOFA value and the outcome of patients with gastric perforation where the mean qSOFA score was significantly lower in subjects who lived than those who died.
References
Di Saverio S, Bassi M, Smerieri N, Masetti M, Ferrara F, Fabbri C, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of perforated or bleeding peptic ulcers: 2013 WSES position paper. World J Emerg Sur. 2014;9(1):45.
Søreide K, Thorsen K, Søreide J. Clinical patterns of presentation and attenuated inflammatory response in octo- and nonagenarians with perforated gastroduodenal ulcers. Surgery. 2016;160(2):341-9.
Rather A, Kasana B. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JMS SKIMS. 2015;18(2):162-4.
Na H, Jeong E, Kim I, Kim W, Lee K. Clinical Application of the Quick Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment Score at Intensive Care Unit Admission in Patients with Bacteremia: A Single-Center Experience of Korea. Korean J Crit Care Med. 2017;32(3):247-55.
Osatnik J, Tort-Oribea B, Folco J, Sosa A, Ivulich D, Kleinert M et al. Predictive Performance of Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Scoring in an Argentinian Hospital. J Clin Diagn Res. 2018;12(10).OC22-6.
Nasif. Management of Gastric Ulcer. Journal of the Medical Faculty of Diponegoro University. 2008.
Medscape. Peptic Ulcer Disease Treatment & Management: Approach Considerations, Bleeding Peptic Ulcers, H Pylori Infection, 2018. Available at: https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/181753-treatment. Accessed 27 June 2018.
John W, Simon A. Benign ulceration of the stomach and duodenum. In: Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2nd Ed. London: WB Saunders; 2010:335-44.
Nachiappan M. Scoring systems for outcome prediction of patients with perforation peritonitis. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(3):PC01.
Bagin V, Tarasov E, Astafyeva M, Nishnevich E, Rudnov V, Prudkov M. Quick SOFA vs Rockall preendoscopy scores for risk assessment in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective cohort study. Intern J Emerg Med. 2019;12(1):10.
