DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20193932

Fibroadenoma/benign phyllodes: a cytologic diagnostic challenge

Swati Yadav, Bhawna Sethi, Ashok Sangwaiya, Pawan Singh, Rahul N. Satarkar, Shivani Kalhan, Vibhuti Thakral

Abstract


Background: To study and compare cytomorphological features of histologically proven cases of benign phyllodes and cellular fibroadenoma.

Methods: Smears of histologically-proven cases of benign phyllodes and cellular fibroadenoma in one year, were reviewed. The cellular fibroadenoma had epithelial and/or stromal hypercellularity. The stromal and epithelial components as well as the background cells were qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed.

Results: Number, cellularity and type of stromal fragments varied significantly in two groups. Higher number, intermediate to large-sized and hypercellular stromal fragments were commonly seen in phyllodes. Hypercellular (3+ cellularity) fragments were seen in 100% cases of phyllodes against 11.1% cases of fibroadenoma. Large-sized stromal fragments were found in 100% of phyllodes while in only 11.1% cases of fibroadenoma. The ratio of number of epithelial to stromal fragments was significantly high (58.5:1) in fibroadenoma against phyllodes (1.3:1). The epithelial architecture, atypia, apocrine metaplasia and presence of cystic macrophages did not very much in the two groups. The cellularity of the dispersed cells in background did not reveal significant difference though the type of cells varied; the proportion of long and short spindle cells was higher in PT group while proportion of oval cells was higher in FA group.

Conclusion: The number, cellularity and nature of stromal fragments, ratio of epithelial to stromal fragments, cellularity and type of background cells are helpful in distinguishing benign phyllodes from cellular fibroadenoma. The identification of these features can improve the pickup rate of phyllodes tumor, thereby assisting proper management.


Keywords


Benign phyllodes, Breast, Cellular fibroadenoma, Fibroepithelial tumors

Full Text:

PDF

References


El Hag IA, Aodah A, Kollur SM, Attallah A, Mohamed AA, Al‐Hussaini H. Cytological clues in the distinction between phyllodes tumor and fibroadenoma. Cancer cytopathol. 2010 Feb 25;118(1):33-40.

Bandyopadhyay R, Nag D, Mondal SK, Mukhopadhyay S, Roy S, Sinha SK. Distinction of phyllodes tumor from fibroadenoma: Cytologists’ perspective. J Cytology/Indian Acad Cytolog. 2010 Apr;27(2):59.

Krishnamurthy S, Ashfaq R, Shin HJ, Sneige N. Distinction of phyllodes tumor from fibroadenoma: a reappraisal of an old problem. Cancer Cytopathol. 2000 Dec 25;90(6):342-9.

Jayaram G, Sthaneshwar P. Fine‐needle aspiration cytology of phyllodes tumors. Diagnostic cytopathol. 2002 Apr;26(4):222-7.

Rao CR, Narasimhamurthy NK, Jaganathan K, Mukherjee G, Hazarika D. Cystosarcoma phyllodes. Diagnosis by fine needle aspiration cytol. Acta Cytol. 1992;36(2):203-7.

Shabb N. Phyllodes tumor. Fine needle aspiration cytology of eight cases. Acta Cytol. 1997;41(2): 321-6.

Dusenbery D, Frable WJ. Fine needle aspiration cytology of phyllodes tumor. Potential diagnostic pitfalls. Acta Cytol 1992;36(2):215-21.

Shimizu K, Masawa N, Yamada T, Okamoto K, Kanda K. Cytologic evaluation of phyllodes tumors as compared to fibroadenomas of the breast. Acta Cytol. 1994;38(6):891-7.

Deen SA, McKee GT, Kissin MW. Differential cytologic features of fibroepithelial lesions of the breast. Diagn Cytopathol 1999;20(2):53-6.

Silverman JF, Geisinger KR, Frable WJ. Fine needle aspiration cytology of mesenchymal tumors of the breast. Diagn Cytopathol. 1988;4(1):50-8.

Stanely MW, Tani EM, Rutgvist LE, Skoog L. Cystosarcoma phyllodes of the breast: a cytologic and clinicopathologic study of 23 cases. Diagn Cytopathol. 89;5(1):29-34.