Pros and cons of vitamin D measurements: essential component of quality health care

Authors

  • Meena K. Yadav School of Ayurveda, D. Y. Patil University, Navi Mumbai 400706
  • Ali Netterwala School of Medicine, D. Y. Patil University, Navi Mumbai 400706
  • K. S. Yadav School of Medicine, D. Y. Patil University, Navi Mumbai 400706

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20160834

Keywords:

Vitamin D, Measurements, Quality health care

Abstract

Accuracy in vitamin D measurement is very important because methods used by various laboratories have no uniformities; of course it is choice of individuals but quality in care matters.  There are five different types of Vitamin D but D2 and D3 are the only types that human can use. Earlier researchers have documented that vitamin D3 is better absorbed and utilized than D2. Studies have showed that vitamin D promoting normal blood glycation, immunity, mood swing and other unusual clinical conditions. It is observed from many reports that the effectiveness of D3 provides the most benefit for the human body but there is quite variations in predictive values of different methods.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Lehmann U, Hirche F, Stangl GI, Hinz K, Westphal S, Dierkes J. Bioavailability of vitamin D(2) and D(3) in healthy volunteers, a randomized placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98 (11):4339-45.

Nikooyeh B, Neyestani TR, Farvid M, Alavi-Majd H, Houshiarrad A, Kalayi A, et al. Daily consumption of vitamin D- or Vitamin D + calcium-fortified yogurt drink improved glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2011;93(4):764-71.

Bikle DD. Vitamin D regulation of immune function. Vitamins and Hormones. 2011;86:1-21.

Peterson AL, Murchison C, Zabetian C, Leverenz JB, Watson GS, Montine T, et al. Memory, mood, and vitamin d in persons with Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Parkinson’s disease. 2013;3(4):547-55.

Gadre S, Yadav K, Gomes M. Vitamin D status in Indian population: Major Health concern. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2015;5(1):362-78.

Hilger J, Friedel A, Herr R, Rausch T, Roos F, Wahl DA, et al. A systematic review of vitamin D status in populations worldwide. Br J Nutr. 2014;111(1):23-45.

Holick MF. Vitamin D status: Measurement, Interpretation and Clinical application. Ann Epidemiol. 2009;19(2):73-8.

Jones G. Assay of vitamin D2 and D3 in human plasma by high performance liquid chromatography. Clin Chem. 1978;24:287-98.

Saenger AK, Laha TJ, Bremner DE, Sadrzadeh SMH. Quantification of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 and D3 using HPLC–tandem mass spectrometry and examination of reference intervals for diagnosis of vitamin D deficiency. Am J Clin Pathol. 2006;125:914-20.

Caulfield T, Clark MI, McCormack JP, Rachul C, Field CJ. Representations of the health value of vitamin D supplementation in newspapers: media content analysis. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e006395.

Koul PA, Ahmad SH, Ahmad F, Jan RA, Shah SU, Khan UH. Vitamin D Toxicity in Adults: a case series from an area with endemic hypovitaminosis D. Oman Med J. 2011;26(3):201-4.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-28

How to Cite

Yadav, M. K., Netterwala, A., & Yadav, K. S. (2016). Pros and cons of vitamin D measurements: essential component of quality health care. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 4(4), 1307–1308. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20160834

Issue

Section

Letter to the Editor