A comparative study on the effectiveness of bupivacaine and ropivacaine for supraclavicular block

Authors

  • Nekee Navin Sejpal Department of Anaesthesiology, Govt. Medical College and Superspeciality Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
  • B. D. Bande Department of Anaesthesia, Medicine and Critical Care, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India
  • Kapil Navin Sejpal Department of Nephrology, JIPMER, Pondicherry, India
  • Ravi Nirmalkumar Rajdeo Consultant Radiologist and Director, Photon Scan Pvt. Ltd., Nagpur, Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20194313

Keywords:

Bupivacaine, Motor block, Ropivacaine, Sensory block, Supraclavicular block

Abstract

Background: Bupivacaine and Ropivacaine have been extensively studied &their properties with respect to onset, duration and quality of block. This study aims to detect whether addition of clonidine to both of them changes their properties. This study also aims to use lower than usual dosages for both the local anesthetics to prevent adverse effects of local anesthetics.

Methods: After obtaining ethical approval, the study was carried out on patients undergoing elective upper limb surgeries. They were randomly divided into two Groups: Group B and Group R. The onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade and other parameters were assessed.

Results: The onset of blockade, both sensory & motor was earlier in Ropivacaine as compared to Bupivacaine group. Mean duration of blockade, both sensory & motor, was more in the Bupivacaine group.  

Conclusions: Addition of Clonidine enabled the use of low concentrations (0.25%) of both the anesthetics. Also, Ropivacaine (0.25%) has faster onset of sensory and motor blockade, shorter duration of action and less motor blockade compared to Bupivacaine.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Müller J. Ueber die phantastischen Gesichtserscheinungen: eine physiologische Untersuchung mit einer physiologischen Urkunde des Aristoteles über den Traum, den Philosophen und Aerzten gewidmet. Hölscher; 1826.

Dallenbach KM. Pain: History and present status. Amer J Psychol. 1939;52:331-47.

Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science. 1965 Nov 19;150(3699):971-9.

Rynd F. Neuralgia–introduction of fluid to the nerve. Dublin Med Press. 1845 Mar 12;13(167):19.

Wood A: Treatment of neuralgic pains by narcotic injections. Br Med J. 1858;2:721-3.

Corssen G, Reves JG, Stanley T: Intravenous Anesthesia and Analgesia. Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger, 1988: 99-174.

Singer C, Underwood E. A Short History Of Medicine. 2nd Ed. Oxford: Claredon press; 1962:349.

Merlin D Larson. History of anaesthetic practice. In: Miller RD. Anaesthesia, 6th ed. Elsevier, Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia; 2005:23.

Murphy DB, McCartney CJ, Chan VW: Novel analgesic adjuncts for brachial plexus block: A systematic review. Anesth Analg. 2000;90:1122-8.

Eledjam JJ, Deschodt J, Viel EJ. brachial plexus block with bupivacaine: effects of added alfa-adrenocepter agonists: comparison between clonidine & epinephrine. Can J Anesth. 1991 Oct;38:870-5.

Pöpping DM, Elia N, Marret E, Wenk M, Tramer MR. Clonidine as an Adjuvant to Local Anesthetics for Peripheral Nerve and Plexus BlocksA Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials. Anesthesiology. J Ameri Soci Anesthesiol. 2009 Aug 1;111(2):406-15.

Pavlin DJ, Rapp SE, Polissar NL, Malmgren JA, Koerschgen M, Keyes H. Factors affecting discharge time in adult outpatients. Anesthesia Analgesia. 1998 Oct 1;87(4):816-26.

Bertini L, Tagariello V, Mancini S, Ciaschi A, Posteraro CM, Di Benedetto P, et al. 0.75% and 0.5% ropivacaine for axillary brachial plexus block: a clinical comparison with 0.5% bupivacaine. Regional Anesth Pain Med. 1999 Nov 1;24(6):514-8.

Tripathi D, Shah K, Shah C, Shah S, Das E. Supraclavicalar brachial plexus block for upper limb orthopedic surgery: A randomized, double blinded comparison between ropivacaine and bupivacaine. Internet J Anesthesiol. 2012 Nov;30(4).

Modak S, Basantwani S. Comparative study of 0.5% ropivacaine and 0.5% bupivacaine for brachial plexus block by supraclavicular approach for upper limb surgeries. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2016;5:1205-9.

Kaur A, Singh RB, Tripathi RK, Choubey S. Comparision between bupivacaine and ropivacaine in patients undergoing forearm surgeries under axillary brachial plexus block: a prospective randomized study. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2015 Jan;9(1):UC01.

Hickey R, Hoffmann J, Ramamurthy S. A Comparison of Ropivacaine 0.5% and Bupivacaine 0.5% for brachial plexus block. Anesthesiol. 1991Apr;74(4):639-42.

Vainionpaa VA, Haavisto ET, Huha TM, Korpi KJ, Nuutinen LS, Hollmen AI. A clinical and pharmacokinetic comparison of ropivacaine and bupivacaine in axillary plexus block. Anesth Analg. 1995 Sep 1;81(3):534-8.

Sakonju I, Maeda K, Maekawa R, Maebashi R, Kakuta T, Takase K. Relative nerve blocking properties of bupivacaine and ropivacaine in dogs undergoing brachial plexus block using a nerve stimulator. J Veterinary Med Science. 2009;71(10):1279-84.

Vaghadia H, Vincent C. a comparison between 0.75% Ropivacaine and 0.5% Bupivacaine for brachial plexus block. Can J Anaesth. Nov 1999;46(10):946-51.

Casati A, Borghi B, Fanelli G, Montone N, Rotini R, Fraschini G, et al. Interscalene brachial plexus anaesthesia and analgesia for open shoulder surgery: A Randomized, double blinded comparison between Levobupivacaine and Ropivacaine. Anaesthesia – Analgesia. 2003;96:253-9.

Downloads

Published

2019-09-25

How to Cite

Sejpal, N. N., Bande, B. D., Sejpal, K. N., & Rajdeo, R. N. (2019). A comparative study on the effectiveness of bupivacaine and ropivacaine for supraclavicular block. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 7(10), 3803–3807. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20194313

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles