DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20195901

Antibiotics sensitivity status and antibiogram patterns of aerobic bacterial isolates from surgical site infections

Balvinder Singh Arora, Santhosh Rajan, Ravinder Mohil, Neeraj Narayan Mathur

Abstract


Background: Surgical Site Infections (SSIs) are the third most common nosocomial infections. Emergence and spread of drug resistant strains have been found to pose a serious challenge in the management of such infections. There is limited information on the epidemiology of such pathogens. The antibiotic sensitivity patterns of aerobic bacterial isolates from post-operative SSIs show wide variations that lead to difficulties in empirical selection of the right kind of drug for treatment. Properly planned studies about antibiotic sensitivities patterns of such isolates can help in judicious management of SSIs and cause reduction in morbidity and mortality.

Methods: A total of 50 patients diagnosed by the surgeon and fulfilling the case definition of SSI, were studied for bacteriological analysis. All the clinical specimens were cultured and identified applying standard culture techniques. The aerobic bacterial isolates were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing by Kirby Bauer Disc Diffusion method to arrive at the drug sensitivity patterns. Data were entered in MS Excel spread sheet and analysed using SSPP software version 21.00

Results: A total of 32 patterns of sensitivity were observed. For Esch. coli, a total of nine patterns were observed. All strains of Esch. coli were found sensitive to tigecycline (100%) and colistin (100%). For Klebsiella spp. a total of 9 patterns were obtained with TIG-COL being the predominant pattern in 6 cases. For Acinetobacter spp. only colistin was found most effective drug. In case of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, except colistin (100% sensitivity), there were wide variations in sensitivity with imipenem (71%) as next most effective drug. In Proteus spp. - most of the in-use drugs were effective except cephalosporins. Among gram positive organisms, only three strains of Staphylococcus aureus were isolated, and these were MRSA (100%). Two strains of enterococcus were isolated, and these showed sensitivity to linezolid only.

Conclusions: Wide variations in sensitivity status observed in the study are suggestive that antibiotic usage should be tailored to individual needs and proper selection of antibiotics for management of SSIs must be guided by laboratory antibiogram.


Keywords


Antibiogram pattern, Antimicrobial sensitivity, Escherichia coli, Gram positive cocci, Klebsiella, Surgical site infections

Full Text:

PDF

References


Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR, Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Inf Cont Hospital Epidemiol. 1999;20(4):247-80.

Awad SS. Adherence to Surgical Care Improvement Project Measures and post-operative Surgical site infections. Surg Infect. 2012;13(4):234-7.

Ata A, Lee J, Bestle SL, Desemone J, Stain SC. Postoperative hyperglycemia and surgical site infection in general surgery patients. Archiv Surg. 2010;145(9):858-64.

Magill SS, Hellinger W, Cohen J, Kay R, Bailey C, Boland B, et al. Prevalence of healthcare-associated infections in acute care hospitals in Jacksonville, Florida. Inf Cont Hospital Epidemiol. 2012;33(3):283-91.

Anusha S, Vijaya LD, Pallavi K, Manna PK, Mohanta GP, Manavalan R. An Epidemiological study of surgical wound infections in a surgical unit of tertiary care teaching hospital. Ind J Pharm Pract. 2010;3(4).

Page CP, Bohnen JM, Fletcher JR, McManus AT, Solomkin JS, Wittmann DH. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgical wounds: guidelines for clinical care. Archiv Surg. 1993;128(1):79-88.

Mohanty S, Kapil A, Dhawan B, Das BK. Bacteriological, and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of soft tissue infections from northern India. Indian J Med Sci. 2004;58(1):10-15.

Cheesbrough M. Examination of pus, ulcer material and skin specimens. In: Medical Laboratory Manual for Tropical Countries. 2nd Ed. India: Cambridge university press; 2006:83-89.

Collee JG, Duguid JP, Fraser AG, Marmion BP, Simmons A. Laboratory strategy in the diagnosis of infective syndromes. Mackie McCartney Pract Med Microbiol. 1996;14:53-94.

Wayne, PA in CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, In Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, eds Jean B, Franklin R, George M, Stephen G, James S, Brandi L, et al. 26 ed.M100S CLSI document. USA: Pennsylvania; 2016:52-82.

Trojan R, Razdan L, Singh N. Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns of Bacterial Isolates from Pus Samples in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Punjab, India. Int J Microbiol. 2016;1:1-4.

Mantravadi HB, Chinthaparthi MR, Shravani V. Aerobic isolates in pus and their antibiotic sensitivity pattern: a study conducted in a teaching hospital in Andhra Pradesh. Int J Med Sci Pub Health. 2015 Aug 1;4(8):1076-80.

Sah P, Khanal R, Upadhaya S. Studies on skin and soft tissue infections. J Uni col Med Sci. 2013; 1(3):18-21.

Mohanty S, Kapil A, Dhawan B, Das BK. Bacteriological and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of soft tissue infections from northern India. Indian J Med Sci. 2004;58(1):10-5.

Golia S, Nirmala AR. A study of superficial surgical site infections in a tertiary care hospital at Bangalore. Int J Res Med Sci. 2014 Apr;2(2):647-52.

Praveen DK, Neelima. Bacteriological profile of surgical site infection in rural hospital in R.R. district. Int J Pharm Bio Sci. 2013;4(3):217-21.