DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20195207

Prospective cohort study comparison of bipolar and monopolar transurethral resection of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: haemoglobin, sodium levels, and urethral catheter traction application

Nyoman T. Pradiptha, Gede W. K. Duarsa, Tjokorda G. B. Mahadewa

Abstract


Background: Bipolar Transurethral Resection of Prostate (TURP) and monopolar TURP has been widely used for surgical management of bladder outlet obstruction due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. The aim of this study is to prove the difference of haemoglobin (Hb), sodium levels (Na⁺), application of urethral catheter traction between two groups.

Methods: Prospective cohort study was conducted for 82 patients as eligible sample which divided into two groups, bipolar TURP and Monopolar TURP from September 2018 to August 2019. The patient’s demographics, preoperative, postoperative data, and application of urethral catheter traction were recorded.

Results: The result shows basic characteristic data seem comparable. The decline levels of Hb before surgery 14.2(2.6) and after surgery 13.6(2.6) in monopolar group was significant (p=0.01), and also in bipolar group 13.7(2.1) vs 13.4(2.1) was significant (p=0.033), despite decreasing Hb levels between two groups were insignificant (p=0.639) but decline levels of Na between two groups were significant (p=0.013) Na⁺ level in bipolar 0(3) and monopolar 1(4). The application of urethral catheter traction in bipolar (19.5%) lower than monopolar (80.5%) were statistically significant (p<0.001).

Conclusions: Based on the results of this study, bipolar TURP surgery can be an optional recommendation in treating Benign Prostate Hyperplasia (BPH) in terms of better preserving blood sodium during surgery and low use of traction without significant bleeding complications.


Keywords


Benign prostatic hyperplasia, Bipolar, Catheter traction, Monopolar, SF-36 questionnaire, Transurethral resection of prostate

Full Text:

PDF

References


Shahar E, Folsom AR, Romm FJ, Bisgard KM, Metcalf PA, Crum L, et al. Patterns of aspirin use in middle-aged adults: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Am Heart J. 1996;131(5):915-22.

Sehgal M, Wood SK, Ouslander JG, Hennekens CH. Aspirin in older adults: need for wider utilization in secondary prevention and individual clinical judgments in primary prevention. J Cardiovas Pharmacol Therapeut. 2017;22(6):511-3.

Enver MK, Hoh I, Chinegwundoh FI. The management of aspirin in transurethral prostatectomy: current practice in the UK. The Annals Royal Colleg Surg Engl. 2006;88(3):280-3.

Gratzke C, Bachmann A, Descazeaud A, Drake MJ, Madersbacher S, Mamoulakis C, et al. EAU guidelines on the assessment of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms including benign prostatic obstruction. Europ Urol. 2015;67(6):1099-109.

Duarsa GW, Lesmana R, Mahadewa TG. High serum prostate specific antigen as a risk factor for moderate-severe prostate inflammation in patient with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Bali Med J. 2016;4(3):148-51.

Rosadi B, Mahadewa TG, Duarsa GW. The role of multiplex polymerase chain reaction in detecting etiological causes of bacterial prostatitis associated benign prostatic hyperplasia. Bali Med J. 2015;4(1):44-7.

Karadeniz MS, Bayazit E, Aksoy O, Salviz EA, Tefik T, Sanli O, et al. Bipolar versus monopolar resection of benign prostate hyperplasia: a comparison of plasma electrolytes, hemoglobin and TUR syndrome. Springer Plus. 2016;5(1):1739.

Duarsa GW, Oka AA, Maliawan S, Soebadi DM, Astawa P, Bakta M, et al. Elevated Tumor Necrosis Factor-α and Transforming Growth Factor-β in Prostatic Tissue are Risk Factors for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms after Transurethral Resection of the Prostate in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Patients with Urinary Retention. Open Urol Nephrol J. 2018;11(1).

Hueber PA, Zorn KC. Canadian trend in surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia and laser therapy from 2007-2008 to 2011-2012. Canad Urol Associat J. 2013;7(9-10):582.

Madduri VK, Bera MK, Pal DK. Monopolar versus bipolar transurethral resection of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: Operative outcomes and surgeon preferences, a real-world scenario. Urol Annal. 2016;8(3):291.

Akhavizadegan H. A Novel Technique for Post-Prostatectomy Catheter Traction. Nephro-urol Monthly. 2016;8(4).

Patankar S, Jamkar A, Dobhada S, Gorde V. Plasma Kinetic Superpulse transurethral resection versus conventional transurethral resection of prostate. J Endourol. 2006;20(3):215-9.

Michielsen DP, Coomans D, Braeckman JG, Umbrain V. Bipolar transurethral resection in saline: the solution to avoid hyponatraemia and transurethral resection syndrome. Scandina J Urol Nephrol. 2010 Sep 1;44(4):228-35.

Walker EM, Bera S, Faiz M. Does catheter traction reduce post‐transurethral resection of the prostate blood loss?. British J Urol. 1995;75(5):614-7.

Dodds L, Lawson PS, Crosthwaite AH, Wells GR. Early catheter removal: a prospective study of 100 consecutive patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate. British J Urol. 1995;75(6):755-7.