Computerized tomography based evaluation of level I and II axillary lymph nodes by high conventional tangential fields in carcinoma breast

Lalit Chandrakant; Shabnum Thakur; Manoj Gupta; Rajeev K. Seam; Manish Gupta; Sanjeev Sharma

doi:10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20200220

Authors

Lalit Chandrakant Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, IGMC Shimla, Himanchal Pradesh, India
Shabnum Thakur Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, IGMC Shimla, Himanchal Pradesh, India
Manoj Gupta Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, AIIMS, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India
Rajeev K. Seam Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, M.M.U, Ambala, Haryana, India
Manish Gupta Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, IGMC Shimla, Himanchal Pradesh, India
Sanjeev Sharma Department of Radiology, IGMC Shimla, Himanchal Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20200220

Keywords:

Axillary dissection, Central lung distance, High conventional tangential field

Abstract

Background: Axillary radiation and surgery have provided equivalent local control in early breast cancer patients. It is believed that tangential field (TF) radiation that was used to treat the breast coincidently delivered radiation treatment to the lower axilla and eradicated the disease. In the era of CT-based three dimensional- (3D) radiotherapy planning, however concerns have been raised about the adequacy of coverage of the axillary levels in the tangential fields. In this study, author evaluated the coverage of the axillary nodal levels I and II using high conventional tangential fields in patients with or without axillary dissection.

Methods: A prospective study was conducted which included 18 cases for a period of one year, radiation therapy was planned to the chest wall or whole breast by using the high conventional tangential field using 2D radiation portals. Central lung distance (CLD) and the distance of superior border was measured form the head of the humerus and were recorded. CECT chest was done in the same position alike during conventional simulation. All the images were shifted to the treatment planning system. The Contouring of Axillary lymph nodes level I and II was done on Oncentra contouring software.

Results: The coverage of the axillary nodes was not related to central lung distance (CLD). However, some with CLD of 1cm had more coverage of the level I nodes than with CLD of 2 cm and the maximum CLD in the field was 2.5 cm. Of the 18 patients in the study, 13 patients had <2 cm distance from the humeral head and all the axillary level II LN covered in the field. Whereas 5 patients having distance >2 cm did not have adequate coverage of level II axillary LN’s.

Conclusions: The distance of the cranial border of the tangent portal from the head of the humerus shows a relationship with coverage of level II nodes cranially. As the distance decreases the coverage of level II nodes cranially keeps increasing. In majority of the patients a distance of 2 cm or less than 2 cm ensured good coverage of level II nodes cranially. Similarly, no correlation was found between volumetric coverage of the axillary nodes with central lung distance.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Srivastava VK, Tanvir K, Sarin R. Consensus document for management of breast cancer. ICMR. 2016;(1):12-3.

Barsoum M, Mostafa M, El Hossieny H, Nasr A, Mahmoud M, Fouda S. Dosimetric prospective study comparing 2D and 3D planning for irradiation of supraclavicular and infraclavicular regions in breast cancer patients. J Egypt Nat Cancer Institute. 2015;27(1):25-34.

Stefanovski Z, Smichkoska S, Petrova D, Lazarova E. Advantages of the technique with segmented field for tangential breast irradiation. In Proceed 3rd Conference Med Physics Biomed Engineer. 2013;18:18-9.

Recht A, Gray R, Davidson NE, Fowble BL, Solin LJ, Cummings FJ, et al. Locoregional failure 10 years after mastectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy with or without tamoxifen without irradiation: experience of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(6):1689.

Belkacemi Y, Allab-Pan Q, Bigorie V, Khodari W, Beaussart P, Totobenazara JL, et al. The standard tangential fields used for breast irradiation do not allow optimal coverage and dose distribution in axillary levels I–II and the sentinel node area. Annals Oncol. 2013;24(8):2023-8.

Setton J, Cody H, Tan L, Morrow M, Hudis C, Catalano J, et al. Radiation field design and regional control in sentinel lymph node‐positive breast cancer patients with omission of axillary dissection. Cancer. 2012;118(8):1994-2003.

Haffty BG, Hunt KK, Harris JR, Buchholz TA. Positive sentinel nodes without axillary dissection: implications for the radiation oncologist. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(34):4479-81.

Alço G, Iğdem SI, Ercan T, Dincer M, Şentürk R, Atilla S, et al. Coverage of axillary lymph nodes with high tangential fields in breast radiotherapy. Brit J Radiol. 2010;83(996):1072-6.

Caudle AS, Hunt KK, Tucker SL, Hoffman K, Gainer SM, Lucci A, et al. American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011: impact on surgeon practice patterns. Annals Surg Oncol. 2012;19(10):3144-51.

Bese NS, Kiel K, El‐Gueddari BE, Campbell OB, Awuah B, Vikram B. International Atomic Energy Agency. Radiotherapy for breast cancer in countries with limited resources: program implementation and evidence‐based recommendations. Breast J. 2006;12:96-102.

Giuliano AE, McCall L, Beitsch P, Whitworth PW, Blumencranz P, Leitch AM, et al. Locoregional recurrence after sentinel lymph node dissection with or without axillary dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 randomized trial. Annals Surg. 2010;252(3):426.

Crile JG, Cooperman A, Esselstyn JC, Hermann RE. Results of partial mastectomy in 173 patients followed for from five to ten years. Surg, Gynecol Obstetr. 1980;150(4):563-6.