DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20200240

Coronary anomalies and anatomical variants detected by coronary computed tomographic angiography in Kashmir, India

Suhail Rafiq, Irshad Mohiuddin, Imran Nazir, Malik Faizan

Abstract


Background: Coronary Artery Anomalies (CAAs) presenting in adulthood are rare and associated with adverse cardiac events, including sudden cardiac death. Coronary artery anomaly is the second most common cause of Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD) in young athletes. Cardiac Computed Tomographic Angiography (CTA) is a readily available non-invasive imaging modality that provides high-resolution anatomical information of the coronary arteries. Multi-detector row CT is superior to conventional angiography in defining the ostial origin and proximal path of anomalous coronary branches.

Methods: This was a prospective study included 186 patients who underwent coronary CTA from December 2018 to November 2019 in Government medical College, Srinagar on a 256 slice CT. The indications for coronary CTA were an equivocal, or non-diagnostic stress test, atypical chest pain, suspected anomalous coronary, as well as the evaluation of cardiac cause of syncope.

Results: Ramus intermedius was the most common anatomical variant seen in 25 patients (13.4%). The prevalence of coronary anomalies in this study was 5.66% including myocarding bridging. The most common anomaly was high take off of coronary artery from sinotubular junction accounting for 1.6%.

Conclusions: Coronary Computed Tomographic angiography is much superior in detecting coronary artery anomalies than invasive coronary angiography because of the absence of soft tissue information like as is needed in myocardial bridging. Proper knowledge of the anomalies and their clinical significance is highly important in planning treatment and easing hardships of cardiologists in dealing with them.


Keywords


Coronary artery anomalies, Coronary computed tomographic angiography, Invasive coronary angiography, Ramus intermedius

Full Text:

PDF

References


Basso C, Maron BJ, Corrado D, Thiene G. Clinical profile of congenital coronary artery anomalies with origin from the wrong aortic sinus leading to sudden death in young competitive athletes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 May 1;35(6):1493-501.

Maron BJ: Sudden death in young athletes. N Engl J Med 2003;349:1064-75.

Ghadri JR, Küest SM, Goetti R, Fiechter M, Pazhenkottil AP, Nkoulou RN. Image quality and radiation dose comparison of prospectively triggered low-dose CCTA: 128-slice dual-source high-pitch spiral versus 64-slice single-source sequential acquisition. Inter J Cardio imaging. 2012 Jun 1;28(5):1217-25.

Achenbach S, Marwan M, Ropers D, Schepis T, Pflederer T, Anders K. Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. Eur Heart J. 2009 Nov 5;31(3):340-6.

Herzog BA, Wyss CA, Husmann L, Gaemperli O, Valenta I, Treyer V, et al. First head-to-head comparison of effective radiation dose from low-dose 64-slice CT with prospective ECG-triggering versus invasive coronary angiography. Heart. 2009 Oct 15;95(20):1656-61.

Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Manzke R, Schmid FT, De Vries L, Grass M, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 16-detector row CT: effect of heart rate. Radiol. 2005 Jan;234(1):86-97.

Shi H, Aschoff AJ, Brambs HJ, Hoffmann MH. Multislice CT imaging of anomalous coronary arteries. Eur Radiol. 2004 Dec 1;14(12):2172-81.

Bunce NH, Lorenz CH, Keegan J, Lesser J, Reyes EM, Firmin DN, et al. Coronary artery anomalies: assessment with free-breathing three-dimensional coronary MR angiography. Radiol. 2003 Apr;227(1):201-8.

Samyn MM. A review of the complementary information available with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and multi-slice computed tomography (CT) during the study of congenital heart disease. inter J Cardio Imaging. 2004 Dec 1;20(6):569-78.

Von Ziegler F, Pilla M, McMullan L, Panse P, Leber AW, Wilke N, et al. Visualization of anomalous origin and course of coronary arteries in 748 consecutive symptomatic patients by 64-slice computed tomography angiography. BMC Cardio Dis. 2009 Dec;9(1):54.

Sundaram B, Kreml R, Patel S. Imaging of coronary artery anomalies. Radiol Clin. 2010 Jul;48(4):711-27.

Xu H, Zhu Y, Zhu X, Tang L, Xu Y. Anomalous coronary arteries: depiction at dual-source computed tomographic coronary angiography. J Thora Cardio Surg. 2012 Jun 1;143(6):1286-91.

Chaosuwannakit N. Anatomical variants and coronary anomalies detected by dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography in North-eastern Thailand. Polish J Radiol. 2018;83:e372.

Angelini P, Velasco JA, Flamm S. Coronary anomalies: incidence, pathophysiology, and clinical relevance. Circulation. 2002 May 21;105(20):2449-54.

Kacmaz F, Ozbulbul NI, Alyan O, Maden O, Demir AD, Balbay Y, et al. Imaging of coronary artery anomalies: the role of multidetector computed tomography. Coro Artery Dis. 2008 May 1;19(3):203-9.

Kim SY, Seo JB, Do KH, Heo JN, Lee JS, Song JW, et al. Coronary artery anomalies: classification and ecg-gated multi-detector row CT findings with angiographic correlation. Radiographics. 2006 Mar;26(2):317-33.

Young PM, Gerber TC, Williamson EE, Julsrud PR, Herfkens RJ. Cardiac imaging: Part 2, normal, variant, and anomalous configurations of the coronary vasculature. Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Oct;197(4):816-26.

Namgung J, Kim JA. The prevalence of coronary anomalies in a single center of Korea: origination, course, and termination anomalies of aberrant coronary arteries detected by ECG-gated cardiac MDCT. BMC Cardio Dis. 2014 Dec;14(1):48.

Zeina AR, Blinder J, Sharif D, Rosenschein U, Barmeir E. Congenital coronary artery anomalies in adults: non-invasive assessment with multidetector CT. Bri J Radiol. 2009 Mar;82(975):254-61.

Vlodaver Z, Neufeld HN, Edwards JE. Pathology of coronary disease. Semin Roentgenol. 1972;7:376-94.