Mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy: its role in the management of renal stone and our tertiary care centre experience

Authors

  • Avinash Pratap Singh Thakur Department of Urology, Super specialty Hospital, Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India
  • Darsan S. Department of Urology, Super speciality block, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20200246

Keywords:

Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Mini- Miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Renal stones, Stone-free rate

Abstract

Background: Miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) procedures for urolithiasis have gained increased popularity in recent years. To decrease the complications of conventional PCNL by  reduced tract size led to the development of Mini PCNL, which makes the use of 15-18F sheaths in place of 24-30F of conventional PCNL. It has developed rapidly and become a popular technique of renal stone management with reduced morbidity and excellent outcome. Authors report our experience with Mini PCNL for the treatment of renal stone.

Methods: In between his August 2015 and January 2018, sixty patients with the diagnosis of unilateral single medium size (8-20mm) renal stone were identified. Patient’s demographical, clinical, diagnostic and procedural data were recorded.  All patients were evaluated by history taking, physical examination and laboratory investigations. Radiological evaluation was done with X ray kidney, ureter and bladder region (KUB) and also with renal ultrasonography followed by computed tomography (CT). All patients underwent Mini PCNL using 12F nephroscope and 16.5/17.5F sheath. Holmium: YAG laser was used for stone fragmentation. No nephrostomy tube was used routinely. Treatment outcome was assessed in terms of operative time, haemoglobin drop, hospital stay and stone free rate.

Results: Complete stone fragmentation was achieved in 41 out of 60 patients using Mini PCNL, so initial stone free rate was 68.3%. After 4 weeks of surgery total 53 patients were stone free (88.3%), 5 patients required some auxiliary procedure for complete clearance of stone and other 2 were managed conservatively. The mean operative time was 48.28 min, mean haemoglobin drop was 0.74gm/l and mean postoperative hospital stay was 54.22 hours. After 12 weeks postoperatively all patients were stone free. There were no significant postoperative complications, and all had good quality of life.

Conclusion: Mini PCNL technique appears to be safe and effective alternative to conventional PCNL for moderate size renal calculi. It is usually related to less blood loss and shorter hospital stay than the standard method. It can achieve good stone-free rates with minimal complications and low morbidity. Mini PCNL can also be considered as a good alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery and shockwave lithotripsy in selected cases. However, further high quality studies with larger sample size are required in future.

References

Prezioso D, Di Martino M, Galasso R, Iapicca G. Laboratory assessment. Urologia Internationalis. 2007;79(Suppl. 1):20-5.

Perera M, Papa N, Kinnear N, Wetherell D, Lawrentschuk N, Webb D, et al. J Endourol. 2016 Nov; 30(11):1194-9.

Agrawal MS, Sharma M, Agarwal K. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy using antegrade tether: A randomized study. J Endourol. 2014 Jun 1;28(6):644-8.

Feng MI, Tamaddon K, Mikhail A, Kaptein JS, Bellman GC. Prospective randomized study of various techniques of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology. 2001;58:345-50.

Kumar R, Anand A, Saxena V, Seth A, Dogra PN, Gupta NP. Safety and efficacy of PCNL for management of staghorn calculi in pediatric patients. J Pediatr Urol. 2011;7(3):248-51.

Cheng F, Yu W, Zhang X, Yang S, Xia Y, Ruan Y. Minimally invasive tract in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones. J Endourol. 2010 Oct 1;24(10):1579-82.

Mishra S, Sharma R, Garg C, Kurien A, Sabnis R, Desai M. Prospective comparative study of miniperc and standard PNL for treatment of 1 to 2 cm size renal stone. BJU Intern. 2011 Sep 1;108(6):896-900.

Ferakis N, Stavropoulos M. Mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of renal and upper ureteral stones: lessons learned from a review of the literature. Urol Annal. 2015;7(2):141-8.

Helal M, Black T, Lockhart J, Figueroa TE. The Hickman peel-away sheath: alternative for pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 1997;11(3):171-2.

Jackman SV, Docimo SG, Cadeddu JA, Bishoff JT, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW. The mini-perc technique: a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol. 1998;16(6):371-4.

Zhu W, Liu Y, Liu L, Lei M, Yuan J, Wan SP, et al. Minimally invasive versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2015 Nov 1;43(6):563-70.

Druskin SC, Ziemba JB. Minimally invasive (‘Mini’) percutaneous nephrolithotomy: classification, indications, and outcomes. Curr Urol Reports. 2016;17(4);30.

Monga M, Oglevie S. Minipercutaneous nephorlithotomy. J Endourol. 2000;14:419-21.

Sun H, Zhang Z, Yuan J, Liu Y, Lei M, Luo J, et al. Safety and efficacy of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of patients with medullary sponge kidney. Urolithiasis. 2016 Oct 1;44(5):421-6.

Armagan A, Tepeler A, Silay MS, Ersoz C, Akcay M, Akman T, et al. Micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of moderate-size renal calculi. J Endourol. 2013;27(2):177-81.

Chan DY, Jarrett TW. Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2000;14:269-72.

Knoll T, Wezel F, Michel MS, Honeck P, Wendt-Nordahl G. Do patients benefit from miniaturized tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? A comparative prospective study. J Endourol. 2010;24:1075-9.

Desai J, Zeng G, Zhao Z, Zhong W, Chen W, Wu W. A novel technique of ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Introduction and an initial experience for treatment of upper urinary calculi less than 2 cm. Biomed Res Int. 2013.

Kruck S, Anastasiadis AG, Herrmann TR, Walcher U, Abdelhafez MF, Nicklas AP, et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: An alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery and shockwave lithotripsy. World J Urol. 2013;31:1555-61.

Albala DM, Assimos DG, Clayman RV, Denstedt JD, Grasso M, Gutierrez-Aceves J. Lower pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis- initial results. J Urol. 2001;166:2072-80.

Pan J, Chen Q, Xue W, Chen Y, Xia L, Chen H, et al. RIRS versus mPCNL for single renal stone of 2-3 cm: Clinical outcome and cost-effective analysis in Chinese medical setting. Urolithiasis. 2013;41:73-8.

Schoenthaler M, Wilhelm K, Hein S, Adams F, Schlager D, Wetterauer U, et al. Ultra-mini PCNL versus flexible ureteroscopy: A matched analysis of treatment costs (endoscopes and disposables) in patients with renal stones 10-20 mm. World J Urol. 2015:1-5.

Knoll T, Jessen JP, Honeck P, Wendt-Nordahl G. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus miniaturized PNL for solitary renal calculi of 10-30 mm size. World J Urol. 2011;29:755-9.

Mehmet NM, Ender O. Effect of urinary stone disease and its treatment on renal function. World J Nephrol. 2015;4(2):271-6.

Lee JW, Park J, Lee SB, Son H, Cho SY, Jeong H. Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones larger than 10 mm: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Urology. 2015;86:873-7.

Jackman SV, Hedican SP, Peters CA, Docimo SG. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in infants and preschool age children: Experience with a new technique. Urology. 1998;52:697-701.

Yuruk E, Binbay M, Sari E, Akman T, Altinyay E, Baykal M. A prospective, randomized trial of management for asymptomatic lower pole calculi. J Urol. 2010;183:1424-8.

Kuo RL, Lingeman JE, Leveillee RJ, Pearle MS, Waskins S. Lower pole II: initial results from a comparison of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), ureteroscopy (URS), and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy (PNL) for lower pole nephrolithiasis. J Urol. 2003;169(Suppl.):486.

Skolarikos A, Papatsoris AG. Diagnosis and management of post percutaneous nephrolithotomy residual stone fragments. J Endourol. 2009;23:1751-5.

Zeng G, Zhao Z, Wan S, Mai Z, Wu W, Zhong W, et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for simple and complex renal caliceal stones: A comparative analysis of more than 10,000 cases. J Endourol. 2013;27:1203-8.

Liu M, Huang J, Lu J, Hu L, Wang Z, Ma W, et al. Selective tubeless minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for upper urinary calculi. Minerva urologica e nefrologica Ital J Urol Nephrol. 2017 Aug;69(4):366-71.

Liu C, Zhang X, Liu Y, Wang P. Prevention and treatment of septic shock following mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A single-center retrospective study of 834 cases. World J Urol. 2013;31:1593-7.

Seitz C, Desai M, Häcker A, Hakenberg OW, Liatsikos E, Nagele U, et al. Incidence, prevention, and management of complications following percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy. Eur Urol. 2012;61:146-58.

Downloads

Published

2020-01-27

How to Cite

Thakur, A. P. S., & S., D. (2020). Mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy: its role in the management of renal stone and our tertiary care centre experience. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 8(2), 624–629. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20200246

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles