DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20210868

Whipple's pancreaticoduodenectomy: perioperative outcomes in a tertiary care hospital in Dhaka, Bangladesh

A. B. M. Bayezid Hossain, Sadia Afroz, M. Tasnimul Khair Shovon, Nabila Anjuman, Mitul Chackraborty

Abstract


Background: Pancreaticoduodenectomy is one of the most complex surgery with significant mortality and morbidity. Though the mortality rate has steadily improved, morbidity continues to be high. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the perioperative outcome following this procedure at our hospital.

Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in the department of Surgery, Sir Salimullah medical college and Mitford hospital from July 2018 to December 2019. A total of 29 patients who undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy were included in the study. Preoperative, intra-operative and post-operative data were analyzed with emphasis on the morbidity and mortality rates. None of the operated patients received any types of neoadjuvant therapy.

Results: Out of 29 patients who underwent PD, 18 (62.1%) were male and 11 (37.9%) were female with a median age of 53.7 years. The most common (34.5%) age group of the patients were 51-60 years. Jaundice was the commonest (89.7%) presenting symptoms followed by anorexia (75.9%) and abdominal pain (48.3%). Overall complications occurred in 37.9% patients, including wound infections (31.0%) and post-operative pancreatic fistula (6.9%). The post-operative mortality rate was 6.9%.

Conclusions: PD still causes considerable morbidity and mortality. With careful patient selection, adequate preoperative preparation, surgical technique, excellent critical care management PD can be performed safely. At our center we have a reasonable volume and our data are comparable to literature data.

 


Keywords


Pancreaticoduodenectomy, Whipple’s procedure, Outcome

Full Text:

PDF

References


Karim SAM, Abdulla KS, Abdulkarim QH, Rahim FH. The outcomes and complications of Pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple procedure): Cross sectional study. Int J Surg 2015;21:568-571.

Jakhmola CK, Kumar A. Whiple’s Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Outcomes at a tertiary care hospital. MJAFI. 2014;70:321-6.

Neoptolemos JP, Russell RC, Bramhall S, Theis B. Low mortality following resection for pancreatic and periampullary tumours in 1026 patients: UK survey of specialist pancreatic units. UK Pancreatic Cancer Group. Br J Surg. 1997;84:1370-6.

Wipassakornwarawut S. Seven years experience of pancreaticoduodenectomy at sawanpracharak hospital. J Med Assoc Thai. 2008;91(7):1043-50.

Leichtle SW, Kaoutzanis C, Mouawad NJ, Welch KB, Lampman R, Hoshal VI, et al. Classic Whipple versus pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy in the ACS NSQIP. JSR, 2013;183:170-6.

Whipple AO, Present-day surgery of the pancreas. N Eng J Med. 1942;226:515-26.

Cameron JI, Rial TS, Coleman J, Belcher KA, One thousand consecutive Pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg. 2006;244(1):10-5.

Lai ECH, Yang GPC, Tang CN. Robot assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy- a comparative study. Int J Surg. 2012;10:475-9.

Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an International Study Group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138:8-13.

Nussbaum DP, Penne K, Stinnett SS, Speicher PJ, Cocieru A, Blazer DG, et al. A standardized care plan is associated with shorter hospital length of stay in patients indergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. JSR. 2015;193:237-45.

Casado MCM, Sanchez FP, Sastre FR, Cruchaga PM, Francisco J, Cienfuegos A. Experience of cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy fast track program. GIR ESP. 2010;87(6):378-84.

Conzo G, GambardellaC, Tartaglia E, Sciascia V, Mauriello C, Napolitano S. Pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Evaluation of different surgical approaches in the management of pancreatic stump. Int J Surg. 2015;21:S4-9.

Romano G, Agrusa A, Galia M. Whipple’s pancreaticoduodenectomy: Surgical technique and perioperative clinical outcomes in a single center. Int J Surg. 2015;21:568-71.

Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, Belcher KA. One thousand consecutive Pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg. 2006;244:10-15.

Pal KMI, Bari H, Nasim S. Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A developing country perspective. J Pak Med Assoc. 2011;61;232-5.

Gracia SH, Reyes JEB, Escamilla LMM. Whipple surgery learning curve for tumors resection of the duodenal bilio-pancreatic complex in a tertiary care hospital. MOJ Tumor Res. 2018;1(3):104-7.

DeOliveira ML, Winter JM, Schafer M, Cunningham SC, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ, et al. Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: a novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 2006;244:931-7.

Lin J, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ, Riall TS, Lillemore KD. Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreaticoduodenectomy pancreaticocutaneous fistula. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8: 951-9.

Peng S, Mou Y, Cai X, Peng C. Binding pancreaticojejunostomy is a new technique to minimize leakage. Am J Surg. 2002;183:283-5.

Gouma DJ, Van Geenen RCI, Van Gulik TM. Rates of complications and death after postpancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. Ann Surg. 2000;232: 786-95.

Jagannath P, Dhir V, Shrikhande S, Shah RC, Mullerpatan P, Mohandas KM. Effect of preoperative biliary stenting on immediate outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 2005;92: 356-61.

Mistry JH, Mehta N, Varma V, Kapoors S, Kumaran V, Nandy S. Pancreatic fistula following Whipple’s procedure predictors and outcomes. HPB Surg. 2012;33(3):63.