Comparison of levobupivacaine with ropivacaine for supraclavicular brachial plexus block


  • Shantanu B. Kulkarni Department of Anaesthesia, LTMMC and LTMGH, Sion, Mumbai
  • Meena Pimpare Department of Anaesthesia, LTMMC and LTMGH, Sion, Mumbai
  • Balasaheb T. Govardhane Department of Anaesthesia, LTMMC and LTMGH, Sion, Mumbai



Supraclavicular brachial plexus, Levobupivacaine, Ropivacaine, Upper limb surgeries


Background: Peripheral nerve blocks have assumed a prominent role in modern anaesthesia practice as they provide ideal operative conditions without any general anaesthesia or adverse haemodynamic effects. When compared with ropivacaine, levobupivacaine is a newer, safer, longer acting local anaesthetic with rapid onset and prolonged duration of analgesia and similar or more pronounced nerve blocking effects, depending on the concentration. Hence the present study is aimed to compare the effectiveness of 0.5% levobupivacaine and 0.5% ropivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block.

Methods: The present study was a prospective, randomized, double blind comparative study of 60 patients with ASA grade I, II of either sex, between the ages 18 years to 60 years. They were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups. Supraclavicular brachial plexus block was given for upper limb surgeries using 0.5% levobupivacaine (Group L) or 0.5% ropivacaine (Group R). The onset of sensory and motor block, their duration, and possible adverse events were recorded and compared for both groups.

Results: Significant earlier onset of sensory blockade (p=0.027) and motor blockade (p=0.01), prolonged duration of sensory and motor blockade (p=0.0001) was observed in group of patients receiving levobupivacaine compared to ropivacaine. The time for first rescue analgesia required post operatively was much longer in Group L(13.2333±1.1651hr) as compared to Group R(10.8667±0.91852 hr) and the difference was significant (p=0.0001).Intraoperatively throughout the study heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were comparable in both the groups and found no statistically significant difference (p >0.05). The heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure for both the groups were compared postoperatively and observed no statistical significant difference (p >0.05). No adverse effects were observed in both the groups.

Conclusions: 0.5% levobupivacaine used in supraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper limb surgeries provides rapid onset of sensory and motor blockade and prolonged duration of analgesia compared to 0.5% ropivacaine.



Damien B, Murhy, Collin JL, Cartney, Vincent WS. Novel analgesic adjuvants for brachial plexus block: A Systemic review. Anesth Analg. 2000;90:1122-8.

Abrahams MS, Aziz MF, Fu RF, Horn JL. Ultrasound guidance compared with electrical neurostimulation for peripheral nerve block: A systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:408-17.

Williams SR, Chouinard P, Arcand G, Harris P, Ruel M, Boudreault D, et al. Ultrasound guidance speeds execution and improves the quality of supraclavicular block. Anesth Analg. 2003;97(5):1518-23.

Heid FM, Jage J, Guth M, Bauwe N, Brambrink AM. Efficacy of vertical infraclavicular plexus block vs. modified axillary plexus block: a prospective, randomized, observer-blinded study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005;49:677-82.

Hadzic A, Vloka JD. Infraclavicular brachial plexus block. New York School of Regional Anesthesia [internet].

Sessler DI, Rubinstein EH, Moayeri A. Physiological responses to mild perianesthetic hypothermia in humans. Anesthesiology. 1991;75:594-610.

Sessler DI. Perioperative hypothermia. New England Journal of Medicine. 1997;336:1730-77.

De Jong R. Regional anaesthesia and analgesia. In Brown DL, ed Local anesthetic pharmacology. Philadelphia, Saunders; 1996: 124-42.

Cox CR, Faccenda KA, Gilhooly C, Bannister J, Scott NB, Morrison LMM. Extradural S(-) Bupivacaine: comparision with racemic RS bupivacaine. Br J Anaesth. 1998;80:289-93.

Mageswaran R, Choy YC. Comparison of 0.5% ropivacaine and 0.5% levobupivacaine for infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Med J Malaysia. 2010;65(4):300-3.

Nodulas N, Kaliakmanis D, Graikiotis A, Kouvalakidou A. Comparison of Levobupivacaine 0.5% and Ropivacaine 0.5% for digital nerve block in ambulatory surgery. European Journal of Anaesthesiology. 2011;28:120.

Casati A, Borghi B, Fanelli G, Montone N, Rotini R, Fraschini G, et al. Interscalene brachial plexus anesthesia and analgesia for open shoulder surgery: a randomized, double-blinded comparison between levobupivacaine and ropivacaine. Anesth Analg. 2003;96(1):253-9.

Deshpande JP, Ghodaki PS, Sardesai S. Comparative clinical study Between Racemic Bupivacaine and Levobupivacaine in Supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Indian journal of applied research. 2014;4(5):451-4

Cline E, Franz D, Polley RD, Maye J, Burkard J, Pellegrini J. Analgesia and effectiveness of levobupivacaine compared with ropivacaine in patients undergoing an axillary brachial plexus block. AANA J. 2004;72(5):339-45.

Fournier R, Faust A, Chassot O, Gamulin Z. Levobupivacaine 0.5% provides longer analgesia after sciatic nerve block using the Labat approach than the same dose of ropivacaine in foot and ankle surgery. Anesth Analg. 2010;110(5):1486-9.

Fusun E, Berit GC, Sinem SAK, Mehmet T, Tolga A, Lutfi Y. Comparative study of two agents in axillary brachial plexus block: Bupivacaine Vs Levobupivacaine. Smyrna Tip Dergisi. 2011:27-34.




How to Cite

Kulkarni, S. B., Pimpare, M., & Govardhane, B. T. (2016). Comparison of levobupivacaine with ropivacaine for supraclavicular brachial plexus block. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 4(9), 3789–3796.



Original Research Articles