Efficacy of two-person technique for I-gel insertion: a prospective observational study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20211354Keywords:
I-gel, Supraglottic airway, Two-person techniqueAbstract
Background: Recently anesthesiologists favoring I-gel over ET in securing airway during general anaesthesia because of better haemodynamic response and post-operative complications. In this study, we have assessed the efficacy of two -person technique for insertion of I- gel in paralysed patients.
Methods: I- gel is insertion was done in 40 patients undergoing general anaesthesia. Insertion time, number of attempts, air leaks, Tidal volume (TV) and expired tidal volume (ETV), emergence from anaesthesia, post-operative complications were assessed.
Results: Mean insertion time was 14.02±1.99 seconds. Insertion was successful in 37 patients (92.5%) in first attempt. 3 (7.5%) patients needed second attempts. Emergence from anaesthesia was satisfactory in all cases (100%).3 patients (7.5%) had mild cough and there were blood stained in the device in 2 cases (5%).
6 patients (15%) had mild, 5 patients (12.5%) had moderate sore throat in first 24 hours. 4 patients (10%) had mild pain during swallowing.
Conclusions: Two- person technique for insertion of I-gel is easier and lower insertion time with fewer complications.
Metrics
References
Dyer RA, Llewellyn RL, James MF. Total i.v. anaesthesia with propofol and the laryngeal mask for orthopaedic surgery. Br J Anaesth. 1995;74(2):123-8.
Rc C, Rm D, Jr S. Prospective comparison of use of the laryngeal mask and endotracheal tube for ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg. 1994;79(4):719-27.
About i-gel. Available at https:// www. intersurgical. com/info/igel. Accessed on 17 November 2020.
Insertion of i-gel TM by the reversed technique improves the success rate and reduces the time taken for its placement: A prospective, randomized, controlled, interventional trial. Available at http:// www. joacp. org/ article.asp? issn = 0970-9185;year=2017;volume=33;issue=2;spage=226;epage=230;aulast=Sharda. Accessed on 12 November 2020.
Kumar D, Hayat M, Khan A. i-gel insertion with modified jaw thrust technique. Indian J Anaesth. 2015;59(2):132.
Dhanda A, Singh S, Bhalotra AR, Chavali S. Clinical comparison of i-gel supraglottic airway device and cuffed endotracheal tube for pressure-controlled ventilation during routine surgical procedures. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2017;45(5):270-6.
Cook T, Howes B. Supraglottic airway devices: recent advances. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2011;11(2):56-61.
Francksen H, Renner J, Hanss R, Scholz J, Doerges V, Bein B. A comparison of the i-gelTM with the LMA-Unique TM in non-paralysed anaesthetised adult patients. Anaesthesia. 2009;64(10):1118-24.
A new single use supraglottic airway device with a noninflatable cuff and an esophageal vent: an observational study of the i-gel. Available at ttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18349185/. Accessed on 12 November 2020.
Gatward JJ, Cook TM, Seller C, Handel J, Simpson T, Vanek V, et al. Evaluation of the size 4 i-gelTM airway in one hundred non-paralysed patients. Anaesthesia. 2008;63(10):1124-30.
Kannaujia A, Srivastava U, Saraswat N, Mishra A, Kumar A, Saxena S. A preliminary study of i-gel: a new supraglottic airway device. Indian J Anaesth. 2009;53(1):52.
Goyal R, Chauhan R, Anand R, Goyal M. A prospective single-center observational study to assess the efficacy of the second-generation supraglottic airway device I-gel in laparoscopic surgeries in children. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2020;36(1):20-4.
Goyal R, Chauhan R, Anand R, Goyal M. A prospective single-center observational study to assess the efficacy of the second-generation supraglottic airway device I-gel in laparoscopic surgeries in children. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2020;36(1):20.
Hashemian R, Nouraei N, Razavi SS, Zaker E, Jafari A, Eftekhari P, et al. Comparison of i–gelTM and laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized paralyzed patients. Int J Crit Inj Sci. 2014;4(4):288-92.
Comparison of clinical performance of i-gelⓇ and Baska MaskⓇ during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Available at https:// www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/ pmc /articles /PMC6900424/. Accessed on 12 November 2020.
Jadhav PA, Dalvi NP, Tendolkar BA. I-gel versus laryngeal mask airway-Proseal: comparison of two supraglottic airway devices in short surgical procedures. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2015;31(2):221.
New single use supraglottic airway device with non-inflatable cuff and gastric tube channel. Available at from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22747859/. Accessed on 12 November 2020.
Helmy AM, Atef HM, El-Taher EM, Henidak AM. Comparative study between I-gel, a new supraglottic airway device, and classical laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized spontaneously ventilated patients. Saudi J Anaesth. 2010;4(3):131-6.
Acott CJ. Extraglottic airway devices for use in diving medicine - part 3: the i-gelTM. Diving Hyperb Med. 2008;38(3):124-7.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
