Effect of tissue glue versus suture in pterygium surgery in a tertiary care center of North-East India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20212223Keywords:
Pterygium, Fibrovascular, Limbal conjunctival autograft, Tissue glueAbstract
Background: Pterygium is a triangular fibrovascular tissue of conjunctiva encroaching on to the cornea. Currently, conjunctival autograft technique after excision is reported as the most suitable and safest method. The autograft transplantation can be done either with the help of suture or tissue adhesives. Objective of the study was to evaluate the effects of tissue glue versus suture in limbal conjunctival autograft transplantation among the patients undergoing pterygium excision.
Methods: A prospective study was carried out in a tertiary eye care hospital. 60 patients with primary pterygium underwent limbal conjunctival autograft transplantation. They were enrolled into two groups, group-A (tissue glue, N=30) and group-B (suture group, N=30). Operative time, postoperative patient comfort and recurrence of pterygium were assessed. The patients were followed-up for 6 months.
Results: The mean surgical time in fibrin glue group (23.56±2.80) was significantly less compared to suture (30.78±2.20) group with p<0.001. Postoperative discomfort in terms of pain, lacrimation and foreign body sensation was significantly less with fibrin glue in comparison to suture (p<0.05). Postoperative complications like redness, subconjunctival hemorrhage, graft edema and graft retraction were significantly more in suture group during late postoperative period. Recurrence of pterygium was noted in two patients (6.67%) in suture group and one patient in fibrin glue group (3.33%) which was not statistically significant (p>0.005).
Conclusions: The use of fibrin glue for securing the limbal conjunctival autograft in pterygium surgery significantly reduces the operating time and postoperative discomfort.
References
Kanski J, Bowling B. Conjunctiva. Kanski's Clinical Ophthalmology. 8th ed. China: Elsevier; 2016: 162-4.
Ang LPK, Azar DT. Ocular surface epithelial stem cells and corneal wound healing response to injury and infection. In: Albert DM, Miller JW, Power WJ, Azar DT, eds. Principles and practice of ophthalmology. 3rd ed. Canada: Elsevier; 2008. 475-79.
Dushku N, Reid TW. P53 expression in altered limbal basal cells of pingueculae, pterygia, and limbal tumors. Curr Eye Res. 1997;16(12):1179-92.
Dushku N, John MK, Schultz GS, Reid TW. Pterygia pathogenesis: corneal invasion by matrix metalloproteinase expressing altered limbal epithelial basal cells. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(5):695-706.
Yuksel B, Unsal SK, Onat S. Comparison of fibrin glue and suture technique in pterygium surgery performed with limbal autograft. Int J Ophthalmol. 2010;3(4):316-20.
Starck T, Kenyon KR, Serrano F. Conjunctival autograft for primary and recurrent pterygia: surgical technique and problem management. Cornea. 1991;10(3):196-202.
Panda A, Kumar S, Kumar A, Bansal R, Bhartiya S. Fibrin glue in ophthalmology. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2009;57(5):371-9.
Uy HS, Reyes JM, Flores JD, Lim BSR. Comparison of fibrin glue and sutures for attaching conjunctival autografts after pterygium excision. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(4):667-71.
Farid M, Pirnazar JR. Pterygium recurrence after excision with conjunctival autograft: a comparison of fibrin tissue adhesive to absorbable sutures. Cornea. 2009;28(1):43-5.
Goswami S, Chatterjee SS, Goswami S, Bhaduri G. A Comparative Study of use of fibrin glue and vicryl suture in conjunctival autograft transplantation following Pterygium Excision. Indian J of Basic and App Med Res. 2014;4:169-75.
Priya VR, Hedge SS. A prospective comparative study to evaluate the outcome of fibrin glue versus sutures for conjunctival autografting after pterygium excision. Int J Health Sci Res. 2015;5(1):93-9.
Moizuddin M, Khadher SA. A comparative study of post-operative outcomes of pterygium excision with autograft using autologous blood and sutures. Indian J Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019;5(1):23-6.
Karalezli A, Kucukerdonmez C, Akova YA, Altan YR, Borazan M. Fibrin glue versus sutures for conjunctival autografting in pterygium surgery: a prospective comparative study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92(9):1206-10.
Bahar I, Weinberger D, Dan G, Avisar R. Pterygium surgery: fibrin glue versus Vicryl sutures for conjunctival closure. Cornea. 2006;25(10):1168-72.
Jiang J, Yang Y, Zhang M, Fu X, Bao X, Yao K. Comparison of fibrin sealant and sutures for conjunctival autograft fixation in pterygium surgery: one-year follow-up. Ophthalmologica. 2008;222(2):105-11.
Yuksel B, Unsal SK, Onat S. Comparison of fibrin glue and suture technique in pterygium surgery performed with limbal autograft. Int J Ophthalmol. 2010;3(4):316-20.
Srinivasan S, Dollin M, Allum P, Berger Y, Rootman DS, Slomovic AR. Fibrin glue versus sutures for attaching the conjunctival autograft in pterygium surgery: a prospective observer masked clinical trial. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93(2):215-8.
Uy HS, Reyes JM, Flores JD, Lim BSR. Comparison of fibrin glue and sutures for attaching conjunctival autografts after pterygium excision. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(4):667-71.
Ozdamar Y, Mutevelli S, Han U, Ileri D, Onal B, Ilhan O, et al. A comparative study of tissue glue and vicryl suture for closing limbal-conjunctival autografts and histologic evaluation after pterygium excision. Cornea. 2008;27(5):552-8.
Ratnalingam V, Eu AL, Ng GL, Taharin R, John E. Fibrin adhesive is better than sutures in pterygium surgery. Cornea. 2010;29(5):485-9.
Cha DM, Kim KH, Choi HJ, Kim MK, Wee WR. A comparative study of the effect of fibrin glue versus sutures on clinical outcome in patients undergoing pterygium excision and conjunctival autografts. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2012;26(6):407-13.
Hall RC, Logan AJ, Wells AP. Comparison of fibrin glue with sutures for pterygium excision surgery with conjunctival autografts. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009;37(6):584-9.
Wang X, Zhang Y, Zhou L, Wei R, Dong L. Comparison of fibrin glue and Vicryl sutures in conjunctival autografting for pterygium surgery. Mol Vis. 2017;23:275-85.