Comparative study on prediction of paediatric endotracheal tube size by ultrasonography and by age based formulas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20161889Keywords:
Ultrasound imaging, Cricoid cartilage, Endotracheal intubationAbstract
Background: Age-based formulas have been widely used to predict the appropriate size of the endotracheal tube (ETT) for intubation in paediatric age group. These formulas often fail to reliably predict the proper size of ETT. The objective of the study is to determine whether the tracheal internal diameter imaged by ultrasound is a better predictor of ETT size than age based formulas.
Methods: The study included a total of 60 patients of ASA 1 and 2 aged between 2 and 15 years of either sex posted for elective surgery under general anaesthesia. After institutional ethical committee approval and written consent from the parents, anaesthesia was induced as per the protocol. The tracheal diameter was measured after induction of anaesthesia, during mask ventilation prior to intubation. A linear high frequency ultrasound probe (GE venue 40) was used to measure the tracheal diameter. The size of ETT was selected according to the measured tracheal diameter. The leak test and adequate oxygenation/ventilation were the objective tests used to validate the appropriateness of the ETT chosen. The ETT sizes determined by age based formulas and by the use of ultrasound were statistically compared with the appropriate ETT size used clinically for intubation.
Results: The estimation of endotracheal tube size with the aid of ultrasound was found to be superior when compared with age based formulas. Ultrasound tube size determination correlated well with clinically used ETT size.
Conclusions: Determination of endotracheal tube size by ultrasound is a good predictor of proper sized ETT in paediatric age group when compared with age based formulas.
References
Charles J Cote. Paeditric anaesthesia. Miller’s Anaesthesia. 7th edition, Philadelphia: Churchill Living stone Elsevier publishers;2010:5490.
Motoyama EK, Davis PJ, Cladis FP. Endotracheal intubation. In Smith’s anesthesia for infants and children. 8th edition. United States: Mosby;1990:269-75.
Cole F. Pediatric formulas for the anesthesiologist. AMA J Dis Child. 1957;94:672-3.
Shibasaki M, Nakajima Y, Ishii S, Shimizu F, Shime N, Sessler DI. Prediction of pediatric endotracheal tube size by ultrasonography. Anesthesiology.2010;113(4):819-24.
Schramm C, Knop J, Jensen K, Plaschke K. Role of ultrasound compared to age-related formulas for uncuffed endotracheal intubation in a pediatric population. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012;22(8):781-6.
Lakhal K, Delplace X, Cottier JP. The feasibility of ultrasound to assess subglottic diameter. Anesth Analg. 2007;104(3):611-4.
Gupta K, Gupta PK, Rastogi B. Assessment of the subglottic region by ultrasonography for estimation of appropriate size endotracheal tube: a clinical prospective study. Anesth Essays Res. 2012;6(2):157-60.
Lakhal K, Delplace X, Cottier JP, Tranquart F, Sauvagnac X, Mercier C, et al. The feasibility of ultrasound to assess subglottic diameter. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:611-4.
Husein M, Manoukian JJ, Platt R, Patenaude Y, Drouin S, Giguere C. Ultrasonography and video bronchoscopy to assess the subglottic diameter in the paediatric population: a first look. J Otolaryngol. 2002;31:220-6.
Raghavendra B, Horii S, Reede DL, Rumancik WM, Persky M, Bergeron T. Sonographic anatomy of the larynx, with particular reference to the vocal cords. J Ultrasound Med. 1987;6:225‑30.
Carp H, Bundy A. A preliminary study of the ultrasound examination of the vocal cords and larynx. Anesth Analg. 1992;75:639‑40.
Schwartz RE, Stayer SA, Pasquariello CA. Tracheal tubeleak test is there inter-observer agreement? J Anaesth. 1993;40:1049-52.
Khine HH, Corddry DH, Kettrick RG, Martin TM, Mccloskey JJ, Rose JB, et al. Comparison of cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes in young children during general anesthesia. Anaesthesiology. 1997;86:627-31.
Schwartz RE, Stayer SA, Pasquariello CA. Tracheal tube leak test‑is there inter‑observer agreement? Can J Anaesth. 1993;40:1049‑52.
Kormano M, Yrjana J. The posterior tracheal band: correlation between computed tomography and chest radiography. Radiology. 1980;136:689‑94.
Terada T, Yoshida S, Yokoyama K. Determination of endotracheal tube size in children from the chest film. Masui. 1981;30:179-82.
Al-mazrou KA, Abdullah KM, Ansari RA. Comparison of the outer diameter of the 'best-fit' endotracheal tube with MRI-measured airway diameter at the cricoid level 17. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009;26(9):736-9.
Hatfield A, Bodenham A. Ultrasound: an emerging role in anaesthesia and intensive care. Br J Anaesth. 1999;83:789‑800.
Eckenhoff JE. Some anatomic considerations of the infant larynx influencing endotracheal anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1951;12:401-10.
Benjamin B. Prolonged intubation injuries of the larynx: endoscopic diagnosis, classification and treatment. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1993;160:1-15.
Wiel E, Vilette B, Darras JA. Laryngotracheal stenosis in children after intubation. report of five cases. Paediatr Anaesth. 1997;7:415-9.
Strauss S. Sonographic appearance of cricoid cartilage calcification in healthy children. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:223-8.
